With Sultan Qaboos University (SQU)’s growing strategic priorities to improve teaching and research performance while increasing their competitive edge and reducing costs, Open Educational Resources (OER) appear as a possible option where e-books are often cited to help streamline the SQU’s resources and services. Similarly, the Instructional and Learning Technologies Program in the College of Education has an interest in the use of open books as a method of increasing accessibility to textbook materials for faculty and students. This descriptive study employed a survey to investigate SQU faculty uses and perceptions of open books to identify the advantages of increasing its accessibility. The analysis of the findings indicates that the faculty at SQU have access to open books and encourage positive experiences using them in their classrooms. That implicates a number of pedagogical benefits that can be supported by the use of open books. Therefore, it is important to grow the awareness among the policy makers and faculty about the benefits of encouraging and granting students access to other OER resources that might lead to more student learning.
Allen, I. E. and J. Seaman (2014). Opening the Curriculum: Open Educational Resources in US Higher Education, Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from
Algers, A. (2020). Open Textbooks: A Balance Between Empowerment and Disruption. Tech Know Learn 25, 569–584 (2020).
Allen, G., Guzman-Alvarez, A., Molinaro, M., & Larsen, D. (2015). Assessing the impact and efficacy of the open-access. ChemWiki textbook project. Educause Learning Initiative Brief. January 2015
Baker, J., & Hood, J. (2011). Things you should know about Gosling Publishing. Retrieved from
Barnes, C. (2007). Disability, higher education and the inclusive society. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 28(1), 135-145
Belikov, O. and M. McLure (2020). A Qualitative Analysis of Open Textbook Reviews. The International Journal of Open Educational Resources 3(2): 25066.
Bliss, T., Hilton, J., Wiley, D., & Thanos, K. (2013). The cost and quality of online open textbooks: Perceptions of community college faculty and students. First Monday, 18(1).
California Open Educational Resources Council. (2016). White paper: OER adoption study. Retrieved from
Clements, K., J. Pawlowski, et al. (2015). Open educational resources repositories literature review–Towards a comprehensive quality approaches framework. Computers In Human Behaviour, 51: 1098-1106.
Chapman, V. (2008). Developing inclusive curricula, Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 3, 62-89.
Cummins, J. Brown, K., & Sayers, D. (2007). Literacy, Technology, and Diversity: Teaching for Success in Changing Times. Boston, USA: Pearson.
Cynthia Jimes, Shenandoah Weiss, Renae Keep (2013). Addressing the Local in Localization: A Case Study of Open Textbook Adoption by Three South African Teachers. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(2), 73-86.
Dewi, R., Mujiyanto, J., Rukmini, D. and Saleh, M., (2020). The Relation Between Formulaic Expressions Fluency and Proficiency of Indonesian EFL College Students Using Open book Instructions Via Edmodo. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(1), pp.1030-1043.
Doering, T., Pereira, L. & Kuechler, L. (2012). The use of e-textbooks in higher education: A case study. E-Leader Berlin.
Everard, A., & St Pierre, K. (2014). A case for student adoption of open textbooks. Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 15, 66-76.
Farrow, R. (2017). Open education and critical pedagogy. Learning, Media and Technology, 42(2), 130–146.
Fischer, L., Hilton, J., Robinson, T.J. et al. (2015). A multi-institutional study of the Impact of Open Textbook Adoption on the Learning Outcomes of Post-secondary Students. J Comput High Educ. 27, 159–172.
Hewlett (2013). Open educational resources. http://www.hewlett.org/programs/education-program/open-educational-resources
Jobrack, B. (2011). Tyranny Of The Textbook: An Insider Exposes How Educational Materials Undermine Reforms. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Fry, A., 2018. Factors Affecting the Use of Print and Electronic Books: A Use Study and Discussion. College & Research Libraries, 79(1).
Florida Virtual Campus. (2012). 2012 Florida student textbook survey. Tallahassee, FL. Retrieved from
Fry, A., 2020. Use Patterns For Open Books: The Effects Of A Subject, Age, And Availability On Use Rate. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 46(3), p.102150.
Gonzalez, R., Gasco, J. & Llopis, J (2014). Ict in higher education: an experience with e-books. Applied Computer Science, 10 (1), 1-10.
Grissett JO, Huffman C. (2019). An Open versus Traditional Psychology Textbook: Student Performance, Perceptions, and Use. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 18(1):21-35.
Hilton III, J., Lutz, N. & Wiley, D. (2012). Examining the Reuse of Open Textbooks. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13 (2), 45–58.
Hilton, J. (2016). Open educational resources and college textbook choices: a review of research on efficacy and perceptions. Education Tech Research Dev, 64, 573–590.
Hilton III, J. L., Fischer, L., Wiley, D., & William, L. (2016). Maintaining Momentum Toward Graduation: OER and the Course Throughput Rate. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(6).
Illowsky, B., Hilton III, J., Whiting, J., & Ackerman, J. (2016). Examining Student Perception of an Open Statistics Book. Open Praxis, 8(3), 265-276.
Jhangiani, R. S. and S. Jhangiani (2017). Investigating the perceptions, use, and impact of open textbooks: A survey of post-secondary students in British Columbia. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4).
Jhangiani, R. S., Dastur, F. N., Le Grand, R., & Penner, K. (2018). As Good or Better than Commercial Textbooks: Students’ Perceptions and Outcomes from Using Open Digital and Open Print Textbooks. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1).
Jhangiani, R. S., Pitt, R., Hendricks, C., Key, J., & Lalonde, C. (2016). Exploring faculty use of open educational resources at British Columbia post-secondary institutions. BCcampus.
Johnson, L., Levine, A., Smith, R., & Stone, S. (2010). Horizon report for the new media consortium and the EDUCAUSE learning initiative. Retrieved May 2018.
Jung, E., C. Bauer and Allan, H. (2017). Higher education faculty perceptions of open textbook adoption. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(4).
Loeb, S., Dynarski, S., McFarland, D., Morris, P., Reardon, S., & Reber, S. (2017). Descriptive Analysis in Education: A Guide for Researchers (NCEE 2017-4023). US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance: 1-40.
Lovell-Simons, A. & Kerr, S. (2011). E-books – a key to greater accessibility. In G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown & B. Cleland (Eds.), Changing Demands, Changing Directions. Proceedings Ascilite Hobart 2011, 826-828.
McNaught, A. and Alexander, H. 2014. Ebooks and accessibility. In: Woodward, H. (ed.) Ebooks in Education: Realising the Vision.pp. 35–49. London: Ubiquity Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bal.e
Morales, R. and Baker, A (2018). Secondary Students’ Perceptions of Open Science Textbooks. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(4), pp. 1–9.
Mulholland, E. & Bates, J. (2014). Use and Perceptions of e-books by academic staff in further education. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 40, 494-499.
Nelson, M. R. (2008). E-books in higher education: nearing the end of the era of hype? Educause Review, 43(2), 40.
Delimonta, N., Turtleb, E., Bennettc, A., Adhikarid, K. and Lindshield, B. (2016). University students and faculty have positive perceptions of open/alternative resources and their utilization in a textbook replacement initiative. Research in Learning Technology, 24.
Ozdemir, O. & Hendricks, C. (2017). Instructor and student experiences with open textbooks, from the California open online library for education (Cool4Ed). J Comput High Educ, 29, 98–113.
Pitt, R. (2015). Mainstreaming open textbooks: Educator perspectives on the impact of openstax college open textbooks. International Review of Research on Open and Distributed Learning, 16(4). Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/mainstreaming-open-textbooks-educator/docview/1754593273/se-2?accountid=27575
Ponte, F., Lennox, A., & Hurley, J. (2021). The Evolution of the Open Textbook Initiative. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 1-19.
Prasad, D. & Usagawa, T. (2014). Towards Development of OER Derived Custom-Built Open Textbooks: A Baseline Survey of University Teachers at the University of the South Pacific. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15 (4), 226–247.
Robinson, T., Fischer, L., Wiley, D., Hilton, J. (2014). The Impact of Open Textbooks on Secondary Science Learning Outcomes. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 341-351.
Robinson, Thomas J., (2015). The Effects of Open Educational Resource Adoption on Measures of PostSecondary Student Success. Theses and Dissertations. 5815. Retrieved from
Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Jamali, H. R., & Huntington, P. (2007). What do faculty and students really think about e-books?. Aslib Proceedings, 59 (6), 489 – 511.
Shrode, F., 2013. Environmental Information Sources: Websites and Books. Electronic Green Journal, 1(34).
Slater, R. (2010). Why aren’t e-books gaining more ground in academic libraries? E-book use and perceptions: A review of published literature and research. Journal of Web Librarianship, 4, 305–331.
Ulman, J.G. (2005). Making Technology Work for Learners with Special Needs. Boston, USA: Pearson.
Van Gerven Oei, V. W. J. (2019). Transitioning Punctum Books to Open Source Infrastructure. Punctum Books. Retrieved from
Wiley, D., Hilton III, J. L., Ellington, S., & Hall, T. (2012). A preliminary examination of the cost savings and learning impacts of using open textbooks in middle and high school science classes. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(3), 262-276.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.