##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Children feel wonder and excitement while perceiving an artwork and their aesthetic responses are evident through their spontaneous expressions. During this process, children understand multiple interpretations of familiar themes. Children’s descriptions of artworks are categorised into three levels of appreciation namely, perceptual level, contextual level and analytical level. The objective of the present study is to explore children’s appreciation of art. The quantitative study investigates children’s descriptions of artworks at various levels of art appreciation. The study employs sixty grade IX children from the state of Telangana. The sample selected include equal number of boys and girls from rural and urban areas and they are in the age group of 13-15 years. The stimuli used in the study are artworks depicting landscapes selected from three artistic genres of representational, semi-representational and abstract artworks. Images of artworks are presented randomly to children to elicit their responses. The results of the study showed that representational artworks are better appreciated by children than semi-representational and abstract artworks. The analysis of children’s expressions of artworks at various levels of appreciation reveals that for all three genres of artworks, children are at the perceptual level of appreciation. Statistical analysis of the results illustrates that there are statistically significant differences in appreciation at the perceptual, contextual, and analytical levels of appreciation of three genres of artworks. The findings of the study may be used by educators in providing art learning experiences to children.

References

  1. Hume, D. (1898/1757). Of the standard of taste. In T. H. Green & T. H. Grose (Eds.), Essays moral, political and literary. In Shimamura, A. P. (2012). Toward a science of aesthetics. In Shimamura, A.P. and Palmer, S.E. (Eds.), Aesthetic Science (pp 3-28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     Google Scholar
  2. Hugh, C. (Ed.).1911). "Baumgarten, Alexander Gottlieb". Encyclopædia Britannica (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  3. Parc, J. & Moon, H.C. (2019). Accumulated and Accumulable Cultures: A Case of Public and Private Initiatives Toward K-Pop. Kritika Kultura 32: 429–52. doi: 10.13185/2992.
     Google Scholar
  4. Palmer, S. E., Schloss, K. B., & Sammartino, J. (2013). Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 77–107. doi: 10.1146/annurevpsych-120710-100504.
     Google Scholar
  5. Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4):364–82. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3.
     Google Scholar
  6. Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9, 45–48. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280. 00008.
     Google Scholar
  7. Winkielman, P., Halberstadt, J., Fazendeiro, T., & Catty, S. (2006). Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psychological Science, 17(9):799–806. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006. 01785.x.
     Google Scholar
  8. Ramachandran, V. S. & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6-7, 15-51. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1179/ 174327908X392906.
     Google Scholar
  9. Kuspit, D. (2006). The Emotional Gains of Aesthetic Shock. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 26(3): 344-361. doi: 10.2513/s07251690pi2603_5.
     Google Scholar
  10. Muth, C. & Carbon, C. C. (2013). The aesthetic aha: on the pleasure of having insights into gestalt. Acta Psychologica, 144,25–30. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.05.001.
     Google Scholar
  11. Silvia, P. J. (2009). Looking Past Pleasure: Anger, Confusion, Disgust, Pride, Surprise, and Other Unusual Aesthetic Emotions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(1):48–51. doi:10.1037/A0014632.
     Google Scholar
  12. Armstrong, T., & Detweiler-Bedell, B. (2008). Beauty as an emotion: the exhilarating prospect of mastering a challenging world. Review of General Psychology, 12, 305– 329. doi:10.1037/a0012558.
     Google Scholar
  13. Frijda, N. H. (1989). Aesthetic Emotions and Reality. American Psychologist, 44,1546-1547.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.12.1546.
     Google Scholar
  14. Leder, H., Carbon, C. C., & Ripsas, A. L. (2006). Entitling art: influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings. Acta Psychologica, 121, 176–198. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.08.005.
     Google Scholar
  15. Read, H. (1968). The Meaning of Art. Faber & Faber. London.
     Google Scholar
  16. Renoult, J.P. (2016). The Evolution of Aesthetics: A Review of Models. In Kapoula Z., Vernet M. (Eds.), Aesthetics and Neuroscience. Springer, Cham. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46233-2_17.
     Google Scholar
  17. Gardner, H., Winner, E., & Kirchner, M. (1975). Children’s conceptions of the Arts. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 9 (3), 60–77. Retrieved from http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=00218510%28197507%299%3A3%3C60%3ACCOTA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-F.
     Google Scholar
  18. Housen, A. (1987). Three methods for understanding museum audiences. Museum Studies Journal, 2(4), 41-50. Retrieved from https://vtshome.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/6-3MethodsforMuseumAudiences.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  19. Lin, S.F. & Thomas, G.V. (2002). Development of understanding of popular graphic art: A study of everyday aesthetics in children, adolescents and young adults. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 26(3): 278-287. doi: 10.1080/01650250143000157a.
     Google Scholar
  20. Taunton, M. (1982). Aesthetic responses of young children to the visual arts: A review of the literature. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 16(3):93-109. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/3332196.
     Google Scholar
  21. Kerlavage, M.S. (1995). A bunch of naked ladies and a tiger: Children’s responses to adult works of art. In C. M. Thompson (Ed.), The visual arts and early childhood. In Lye, J. W. Y., Garces-Bacsal, R. M., & Wright, S. K. (2017). Young children’s responses to artworks: The eye, the mind, and the body. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 18(30). Retrieved from http://www.ijea.org/v18n30/.
     Google Scholar
  22. Lye, J. W. Y., Garces-Bacsal, R. M., & Wright, S. K. (2017). Young children’s responses to artworks: The eye, the mind, and the body. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 18(30). Retrieved from http://www.ijea.org/v18n30/.
     Google Scholar
  23. Berlyne, D. E. (Ed.). (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation. Washington, D.C.: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3394907.
     Google Scholar
  24. Dissanayake, E. (2007). What art is and what art does: An overview of contemporary evolutionary hypotheses. In C. Martindale, P. Locher & V. Petrov (Eds.), Evolutionary and neurocognitive approaches to aesthetics, creativity, and the arts (p. 1-14). Baywood Publishing Co.
     Google Scholar
  25. Moxey, K. (1996). Animating aesthetics: response to the visual culture questionnaire. In Law, S. S. M. (2010). An Interdisciplinary Approach to Art Appreciation. New Horizons in Education, 58(2). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ966652.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  26. Law, S. S. M. (2010). An Interdisciplinary Approach to Art Appreciation. New Horizons in Education, 58(2). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ966652.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  27. Housen, A. (2002). Aesthetic thought, critical thinking and transfer. Art and Learning Research Journal, 18, 99–132. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f92a/f0a61718efaca853d456c1edec6817dfee31.pdf?_ga=2.174320491.838978140.1577727629-127502483.1577727629.
     Google Scholar
  28. Zakaras, L. & Lowell, J.F. (2008). Cultivating demand for the arts: Arts learning, arts engagement, and state arts policy. Rand Corporation. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monographs/2008/RAND_MG640.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  29. Wright, S. (2003). The arts, young children, and learning. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.in/books/about/The_Arts_Young_Children_and_Learning.html?id=o0ydAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y.
     Google Scholar
  30. Dunn, J. & Wright, S. (2014). Signs, meaning, and embodiment: Learning and pedagogy. In M. Fleming, L. Bresler, & J. O-Toole (Eds.), International handbook of arts and education, International handbook of arts and education. Routledge, NY.
     Google Scholar
  31. Rudolf, S. & Wright, S. (2015). Drawing out the value of the visual: children and young people theorizing time through art and narrative. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 47(4), 486-507. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2015.1006685.
     Google Scholar
  32. Machotka, P. (1966). Aesthetic Criteria in Childhood: justifications of preference. Child Development, 37(4): 877-885. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/1126610.
     Google Scholar
  33. Savva, A. & Trimis, E. (2005). Responses of young children to contemporary art exhibits: The role of artistic experiences. International Journal of Education and the Arts, 6(13). Retrieved from http://ijea.asu.edu/v6n13/.
     Google Scholar
  34. Housen, A. (2001). The eye of the beholder: Research, theory and practice. Paper presented at the conference of aesthetic and art education: A transdisciplinary approach, Lisbon, Portugal. Retrieved from http://www.vtshome.org/pages/vts-downloads.
     Google Scholar
  35. Rieger, K. L. & Chernomas, W. M. (2013). Arts-based learning: analysis of the concept for nursing education. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 10, 53–62. doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2012-0034.
     Google Scholar
  36. Wikström, B.-M. (2011). Works of art as a pedagogical tool: an alternative approach to education. Creative Nursing, 17, 187–194. doi: 10.1891/1078-4535.17.4.187.
     Google Scholar
  37. Subramaniam, M. (2017). The development of a tertiary level visual communication module incorporating an art appreciation approach. In Ping, C. T. S. & Ladin, C. A. (2019). Applications of Art Appreciation in Teaching and Learning in Primary School. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4), 130–140. doi: 10.6007/IJARPED/v8-i4/6441.
     Google Scholar
  38. Madrid, D., Ahmed, U., & Kumar, R. (2019). Examining the Impact of Classroom Environment on Entrepreneurship Education: Case of a Private University in Bahrain. In Ping, C. T. S. & Ladin, C. A. (2019). Applications of Art Appreciation in Teaching and Learning in Primary School. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4): 130–140. doi: 10.6007/IJARPED/v8-i4/6441.
     Google Scholar
  39. Novaković, S. (2015). Preschool teacher's role in the art activities of early and preschool age children. Croatian Journal of Education, 17(0). doi:10.15516/cje. v17i0.1497.
     Google Scholar
  40. Ariffin, M. S. N. (2010). Sejauhmana keberkesanan perlaksanaan sesi apresiasi seni di sekolah menengah dalam pendidikan seni. In Ping, C. T. S., & Ladin, C. A. (2019). Applications of Art Appreciation in Teaching and Learning in Primary School. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4): 130–140. doi: 10.6007/IJARPED/v8-i4/6441.
     Google Scholar
  41. Epstein, A. S. & Trimis, E. (2002). Supporting young artists: The development of visual arts in young children. In Lye, J. W. Y., Garces-Bacsal, R. M., & Wright, S. K. (2017). Young children’s responses to artworks: The eye, the mind, and the body. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 18(30). Retrieved from http://www.ijea.org/v18n30/.
     Google Scholar
  42. Savva, A. (2003). Young Pupil’s Responses to Adult Works of Art. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 4(3). doi: 10.2304/ciec.2003.4.3.6.
     Google Scholar
  43. Gilbert, K.E. & Kuhn, H. (1967). History of aesthetics. In Denac, O. (2014). The significance and role of aesthetic education in schooling. Creative Education, 5(19). doi: 10.4236/ce.2014.519190.
     Google Scholar
  44. NCERT Country report 2010 Art Education in India. Retrieved from https://ncert.nic.in/deaa/pdf/1.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  45. Bellanca, J. A., & Brandt, R.S. (2010). 21st Century skills: Rethinking how students learn. Solution Tree Press. Retrieved from http://soltreemrls3.s3-website-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/solution-tree.com/media/pdf/study_guides/21st_Century_Skills_Study_Guide.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  46. Gardner, H. (2006). World Library of Educationalists Series. The development and education of the mind: The selected works of Howard Gardner. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
     Google Scholar
  47. Savva, A. (2009). Children’s responses to visual images: Preferences, functions and origins. Retrieved from ttp://www.inter-disciplinary.net/wpcontent/uploads/2009/06/andri-savvalasttemplate-15.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  48. Ramsey, I.L. (1982). Effect of Art Style on children’s picture preferences. The Journal of Educational Research, 75(4), 237-240. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/27539901.
     Google Scholar
  49. Wright, S. (2010). Understanding creativity in early childhood: Meaning-making and children’s drawings. London: Sage Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.co.in/books/about/Understanding_Creativity_in_Early_Childh.html?id=DwrIev8fXEQC&redir_esc=y.
     Google Scholar
  50. Yenawine, P. (2003). Jump starting visual literacy: Thoughts on image selection. Art Education, 56(1), 6-12. doi: 10.1080/00043125.2003.11653478.
     Google Scholar
  51. Eisen, S.L, Ulrich, R., Shepley, M.M., Varni, J.W., & Sherman, S. (2008). The stress-reducing effects of art in paediatric health care: Art preferences of healthy children and hospitalized children. Journal of Child Health Care, 12(3): 173-190. doi:10.1177/1367493508092507.
     Google Scholar
  52. Leder, H., Gerger, G., Dressler, S., & Schabmann, A. (2012). How art is appreciated. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1): 2-10. doi:10.1037/a0026396.
     Google Scholar
  53. Leder, H. & Nadal, M. (2014). Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: The aesthetic episode–Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology, 105(4), 443-464. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12084.
     Google Scholar
  54. Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489–508. doi:10.1348/0007126042369811.
     Google Scholar
  55. Augustin, M. D. & Leder, H. (2006). Art expertise: a study of concepts and conceptual spaces. Psychological Science, 48, 135–156. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26514489.
     Google Scholar
  56. Parsons, M. J. (1994). Can children do aesthetics? a developmental account. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 28, 33–45. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3333399.
     Google Scholar
  57. Wang, W. & Ishizaki, K. (2002). Aesthetic development in cross-cultural contexts: A study of art appreciation in Japan, Taiwan, and the United States. Studies in Art Education, 43(4): 373-391. doi: 10.2307/1320984.
     Google Scholar