Can “Debate” Transform Teaching and Learning in Higher Education?



Abstract Views
609

Downloads
487

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Jul 2, 2021
Published Jul 26, 2021
10.24018/ejedu.2021.2.3.142

Abstract viewed = 609 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The purpose of this study is to examine post-graduate students’ perceptions, feelings, attitudes, and evaluation comments of a debate process they experienced in an Educational Policy, Management and Leadership module during their M.A.(Ed.) studies at a well-known Greek university. Furthermore, it aspires to share the perspective of broadening the teaching methodology in Higher Education using level-appropriate and widely appreciated teaching tools. The study was based on a qualitative design. Findings indicated the benefits gained through the learner-centered structured debate approach emphasized on the development of students’ critical, analytical, and communicational skills and stressed their gradual transformation of attitudes. Respondents also stressed active learning and self-driven study, as opposed to the passive learning attained during lectures. Participants’ positive feelings constitute the vehicle to the formation and/or transformation of attitudes and the implications of these transformations for their personal and professional life.

Keywords: Educational Leadership and Policy, Higher Education teaching, Structured Class Debate, Transformation of attitudes and feelings

References

  1. Laurillard, D. (ed.), Rethinking University Teaching: a framework for the effective use of learning technologies, 2nd edition, London - N.Y., Routledge-Falmer, 2002.
     Google Scholar
  2. Trigwell, K., Scholarship of teaching and learning, in L. Hunt & D. Chalmers (eds,) University Teaching in Focus (pp. 253-267), Victoria, Australia, Routledge-ACER, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  3. Bellon, J., A Research-based Justification for Debate across the Curriculum, Argumentation and Advocacy, 36 (3), 161-175, 2000.
     Google Scholar
  4. Oros, A.L., Let’s Debate: Active Learning encourages Student Participation and Critical Thinking, Journal of Political Science Education, 3 (3), 293-311, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  5. Egglezou, F., Debate and argumentation in the language teaching, 1st PanHellenic Conference of School Advisors “Modern Teaching Approaches” [in Greek] available on http://www.pess.gr/synedria/1-synedrio/anakoinoseis/86-1o-panelinio-synedrio-sxolikwn-symvoulwn.html, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  6. Kedraka, K. & Kourkoutas, Y., Debates in teaching Bioethics, Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 7(1), 32-41, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  7. Stewart, M., Understanding Learning: Theories and Critique, in L. Hunt & D. Chalmers (eds.), University Teaching in Focus: a learning-centered approach (pp.3-20), London and N. Y.: Routledge- ACER, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  8. Illeris, K., A comprehensive understanding of human learning, in K. Illeris (ed.) Contemporary Theories of Learning (pp. 1-13), London and N.Y, Routledge, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  9. Rogers, A., Teaching Adults, Athens, METAIXMIO publications (Greek translation), 1999.
     Google Scholar
  10. Land, R., Discipline-based Teaching, in L. Hunt & D. Chalmers (eds), University Teaching in Focus: a learning-centered approach (pp. 38-55). Victoria, Australia, Routledge-ACER, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  11. Merriam, S.B., Adult learning theory: evolution and future directions, in K. Illeris (ed.), Contemporary Theories of Learning (pp.83-96), London and N.Y., Routledge, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  12. Cranton, P., Understanding and Promoting Transformative Learning: A guide to theory and practice. Stirling, Virginia, Stylus Publishing, LLC, 3rd edition, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  13. Kegan, R., What “form” transforms? A constructive-developmental approach to transformative learning, in K. Illeris (ed.) Contemporary Theories of Learning London and N.Y.: Routledge, 2018, (pp. 29-45).
     Google Scholar
  14. Mezirow, J., Transformative learning theory, in K. Illeris (ed.), Contemporary Theories of Learning, London and N.Y.: Routledge, 2018, (pp. 114-128).
     Google Scholar
  15. Taylor, E., Fostering Transformative Learning. In J. Mezirow, Ed. Taylor & associates (eds), Transformative Learning in Practice, S.F.: Jossey-Bass, 2010, (pp. 3-17).
     Google Scholar
  16. Mezirow, J., Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory, in E.W. Taylor & P. Cranton (eds), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research and practice, S.F., CA: Jossey-Bass, 2012, (pp. 73-96).
     Google Scholar
  17. Kennedy, R., The power of in-class debates, Active Learning in Higher Education, 10 (3), 225–236, 2009.
     Google Scholar
  18. Merrell, B., Calderwood, K. & Graham, T., Debate across the Disciplines: Structured Classroom Debates in Interdisciplinary Curricula, Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, 37 (0), 57-74, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  19. Hammersley, M., On ‘Systematic’ Reviews of Research Literature: a ‘narrative’ response to Evans & Benefield, British Educational Research Journal, 27, (5), 543-554, 2001.
     Google Scholar
  20. Hanna, L., Barry, C., R., Donnely, R., Hughes, F., Jones, D., Laverty, G. Parsons, C. & Ryan, C., Instructional Design and Assessment, Using Debate to Pharmacy Students About Ethical Issues, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(3), 1-8, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  21. Onen, D., Using Debate to Teach: A Multi-skilling Pedagogy often neglected by University Academic Staff, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 15 (7), 110-126, 2016.
     Google Scholar
  22. Williams, D.E., McGee, B.R. & Worth, D.S., University Student Perceptions of the Efficacy of Participation: An Empirical Investigation, Argumentation and Advocacy, 37(4), 198-209, 2001.
     Google Scholar
  23. Vo, H.X. & Morris, R.L., Debate as a Tool in Teaching Economics: Rationale, Technique and Some Evidence, Journal of Education for Business, 81(6), 315-320, 2006.
     Google Scholar
  24. Scott, S., Perceptions of Students’ Learning Critical Thinking through Debate in a Technology Classroom: A Case Study, Journal of Technology Studies, 34(1), 39-44, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  25. Jagger, S., Affective learning and the classroom debate, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50 (1), 38-50, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  26. Brown, Z., The use of in-class debates as a teaching strategy in increasing students’ critical thinking and collaborative learning skills in higher education, Educational futures, 7 (1), 39-55, 2015.
     Google Scholar
  27. Zawawi, A.A., Ismail, J, & Hakimi I.N.M., Creativity in Higher Education: The Impact of Classroom Debate on the Academic Performance of Administrative Science Students, Journal of Administrative Science, 15(3), 1-8, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  28. Healy, R., The power of debate: Reflections on the potential of debates for engaging students in critical thinking about controversial geographical topics, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36 (2), 239-257, 2012.
     Google Scholar
  29. Souza, C., Debating: a catalyst to enhance learning skills and competencies, Education + Training, 55 (6), 538-549, 2013.
     Google Scholar
  30. Griswold, L.A., Debate as a Teaching Strategy, The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54(4), 427-428, 2000.
     Google Scholar
  31. Hall, D., Debate: Innovative Teaching to Enhance Critical Thinking and Communication Skills in Healthcare Professionals, The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 9(3), 1-8, 2011.
     Google Scholar
  32. Mumtaz, S. & Latif, R., How we teach Classroom and Laboratory Research Projects, Learning through debate during problem-based learning: an active learning strategy, Advances in Physiology Education, 41, 390-394, 2017.
     Google Scholar
  33. Tumposky, N.R., The Debate Debate, The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 78 (2), 52-56, 2004.
     Google Scholar
  34. Omelicheva, M.Y. & Avdeyeva, O., Teaching with Lecture or Debate? Testing the Effectiveness of Traditional versus Active Learning Methods of Instruction, PS: Political Science and Politics, 603-7, 2008.
     Google Scholar
  35. Keller, T., Whittaker, J. & Burke, T., Student debates in policy courses: promoting policy practice skills and knowledge through active learning, Journal of Social Work Education, 37 (2), 343-355, 2001.
     Google Scholar
  36. Goodwin, J., Students’ Perspectives on Debate Exercises in Content Area Classes, Communication Education, 52(2), 157-163, 2003.
     Google Scholar
  37. Smith Randolph, D., Student perceptions of the use of debate as a teaching strategy in the allied health professions, Journal of Allied Health, 36 (1), 13-29, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  38. Darby, M., Debate: A Teaching-Learning Strategy for Developing Competence in Communication and Critical Thinking, Journal of Dental Hygiene, 81(4), 1-10, 2007.
     Google Scholar
  39. Kuckartz, U., Qualitative Text Analysis: A Guide to Methods, Practice and Using Software. L.A., London, N.D., Singapore, Washington, D.C.: SAGE, 2014.
     Google Scholar
  40. Male, T., Analysing Qualitative Data, in I. Palaiologou, D. Needham & T. Male (Eds), Doing Research in Education: Theory and Practice (pp.177-191), London: SAGE, 2016.
     Google Scholar