This paper attempts to present a proposal to teach the natural concepts of hydrodynamics under the ST(R)E(A)M approach. This is a comprehensive teaching proposal for pre-school teachers, with the possibility of implementation in each class, which helps the teacher to enrich his teaching with activities from science, technology, reading and writing, engineering and mathematics, promoting active participation, critical thinking, collaboration, creativity and developing skills necessary for tomorrow's citizens.
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B. & Wong, B. (2010). ‘Doing’ science versus ‘being’ a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617-639.
Bruner, J. (1997). Acts of meaning. Athens: Greek Letters.
Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM Education: A 2020 Vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35
Christenson, L. & James, J (2015) Building Bridges to Understanding: STEM in the Pre-KClassroom. Young Children. (70)1.
Dewey, J. (1990). The School and Society: The Child and the Curriculum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Dimitriadis, S. (2015). Learning theories and educational software. Retrieved June 10, 2019 from https://repository. kallipos.gr/handle/11419/3397.
Hewitt, P.G., (2009). The Concepts of Physics. University publications of Crete.
Kermani, H., & Aldemir, J. (2015). Preparing children for success: integrating science, math, and technology in early childhood classroom. Early Child Development and Care, 185(9), 1504-1527.
Kokkotas, P. (2002): Teaching of Natural Sciences II. Modernapproaches to the teaching of Natural Sciences, 3rd edition improved,Ed. Gregory, Athens.
Koliopoulos, D., Tandaros. S., Papandreou. M., Ravanis. K., (2004). Preschool Children’s Ideas about Floating: A Qualitative Approach. Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 21-24.
Komis, V., & Misirli, A. (2011). Robotique pédagogique et concepts préliminaires de la programmation à l’école maternelle : Une étude de cas basée sur le jouet programmable Bee-Bot. In Proceedings of the 4th conference of “Didactics of Informatics” – DIDAPRO (pp. 271-284). Athènes: New Technologies Editions.
Lantz, H. B. (2009). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education. What Form? What Function? Retrieved August 10, 2012 from http://www.currtechintegrations.com/pdf/STEMEducationArticle.pdf
Lyons, C. D., & Tredwell, C. T. (2015). Steps to implementing technology in inclusive early childhood programs. Computers in the Schools, 32(2), 152-166.
Mantzicopoulos, P., Samarapungavan, A. & Patrick, H. (2009). We learn how to predict and be a scientist: Early science experiences and kindergarten children’s social meanings about science. Cognition and Instruction, 27(4), 312-369.
Moomaw, Sally and Jaumall Davis. (2010). STEM Comes to Preschool. Young Children, 65 (5), 12-18.
Morrison, J. (2006). TIES STEM education monograph series, Attributes of STEM education. Baltimore, MD: TIES
Morrison, J., & Bartlett, R. V. (2009). STEM as a curriculum: An experiential approach. Education Week, 28(23), 28–31.
Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., & Jamil, F. M. (2017). Developing a conceptual model of STEAM teaching practices. School Science and Mathematics, 117, 1–12.
Roberts, A. (2012). A Justification for STEM Education. Technology and Engineering Teacher. May/June 2012.
Selley, N. (1993). Why do things float: A study of the place for alternative models in school science. SSR, 74(269), 55-61.
Stohlmann, M., Moore, J. T. & Roehrig, H. G. (2012). Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 2(1), 28-34.
Tsupros, N., Kohler, R., & Hallinen, J. (2009). STEM education: A project to identify the missing components. Intermediate Unit 1: Center for STEM Education and Leonard Gelfand Center for Service Learning and Outreach, Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.