Differentiating between Good Readers and Poor Readers: The Role of Linguistic and Cognitive Factors


  •   Haris Memisevic

  •   Admira Dedic

  •   Daniel Malec


Attainment of reading ability is one of the most important goals of early elementary education. The goal of the present study was to compare groups of good readers and poor readers on several cognitive and linguistic skills and to determine the influence of these variables in differentiating these two groups of readers. An additional goal was to determine whether there are differences in proportion of boys and girls in groups of good and poor readers. The sample for this study comprised 60 third-grade children divided in two categories, 30 children in the category of good readers and 30 children in the category of poor readers. The results of this study revealed the largest differences between good readers and poor readers were on the phoneme deletion task and processing speed task. Another finding is that more boys than girls were in the group of good readers and more girls than boys in the group of poor readers. It is very important to know which underlying skills best differentiate good and poor readers at certain age. This in turn will lead to creating more effective reading interventions.


Keywords: Cognitive Factors, Gender Differences, Linguistic Factors Reading Abilities


Below, J. L., Skinner, C. H., Fearrington, J. Y., & Sorrell, C. A. (2010). Gender Differences in Early Literacy: Analysis of Kindergarten through Fifth-Grade Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills Probes. School Psychology Review, 39(2), 240-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2010.12087776

Biščević, I., Maleč, D., & Memišević, H. (2021). The Relationship of Reading and Mathematics in Third-Grade Elementary School Students in Canton Sarajevo. Školski vjesnik: časopis za pedagogijsku teoriju i praksu, 70(1), 207-226.

Breda, T., & Napp, C. (2019). Girls’ comparative advantage in reading can largely explain the gender gap in math-related fields. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(31), 15435-15440. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1905779116

Bryant, P. E., MacLean, M., Bradley, L. L., & Crossland, J. (1990). Rhyme and alliteration, phoneme detection, and learning to read. Developmental psychology, 26(3), 429-438.

Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children's Reading Comprehension Ability: Concurrent Prediction by Working Memory, Verbal Ability, and Component Skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31

Carroll, J. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Language and phonological skills in children at high risk of reading difficulties. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(3), 631-640.

Coyle, T. R., Pillow, D. R., Snyder, A. C., & Kochunov, P. (2011). Processing Speed Mediates the Development of General Intelligence (g) in Adolescence. Psychological Science, 22(10), 1265-1269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611418243

Crosson, A. C., & Lesaux, N. K. (2010). Revisiting assumptions about the relationship of fluent reading to comprehension: Spanish-speakers’ text-reading fluency in English. Reading and Writing, 23(5), 475-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9168-8

Daly, M., & Corcoran, R. P. (2019). Kindergarten self-control mediates the gender reading achievement gap: A population-based cohort study. Journal of Research in Personality, 83, 103881. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103881

Di Filippo, G., Brizzolara, D., Chilosi, A., De Luca, M., Judica, A., Pecini, C., Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (2005). Rapid naming, not cancellation speed or articulation rate, predicts reading in an orthographically regular language (Italian). Child Neuropsychology, 11(4), 349-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040490916947

Fluss, J., Ziegler, J., Ecalle, J., Magnan, A., Warszawski, J., Ducot, B., Richard, G., & Billard, C. (2008). Prevalence of reading disabilities in early elementary school: impact of socioeconomic environment on reading development in 3 different educational zones. Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie, 15(6), 1049-1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcped.2008.02.012

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific studies of reading, 5(3), 239-256.

Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., & Papadopoulos, T. C. (2008). Predictors of word decoding and reading fluency across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 566-580. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.566

Gillam, S. L., Fargo, J., Foley, B., & Olszewski, A. (2011). A nonverbal phoneme deletion task administered in a dynamic assessment format. Journal of Communication Disorders, 44(2), 236-245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.11.003

Goswami, U. (1990). A Special Link between Rhyming Skill and the Use of Orthographic Analogies by Beginning Readers. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31(2), 301-311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1990.tb01568.x

Grigorenko, E. L., Klin, A., & Volkmar, F. (2003). Annotation: Hyperlexia: disability or superability? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44(8), 1079-1091.

Hansen, J., & Bowey, J. A. (1994). Phonological Analysis Skills, Verbal Working Memory, and Reading Ability in Second-Grade Children. Child Development, 65(3), 938-950. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00794.x

Hasbrouck, J., & Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59(7), 636-644.

Heikkilä, R., Närhi, V., Aro, M., & Ahonen, T. (2009). Rapid Automatized Naming and Learning Disabilities: Does RAN Have a Specific Connection to Reading or Not? Child Neuropsychology, 15(4), 343-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040802537653

Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00401799

Hoskyn, M., & Swanson, H. L. (2000). Cognitive processing of low achievers and children with reading disabilities: A selective meta-analytic review of the published literature. School Psychology Review, 29(1), 102-119.

Kessels, R. P., Van Zandvoort, M. J., Postma, A., Kappelle, L. J., & De Haan, E. H. (2000). The Corsi block-tapping task: standardization and normative data. Applied neuropsychology, 7(4), 252-258.

Landerl, K., Freudenthaler, H. H., Heene, M., De Jong, P. F., Desrochers, A., Manolitsis, G., Parrila, R., & Georgiou, G. K. (2019). Phonological Awareness and Rapid Automatized Naming as Longitudinal Predictors of Reading in Five Alphabetic Orthographies with Varying Degrees of Consistency. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(3), 220-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1510936

Limbrick, L., Wheldall, K., & Madelaine, A. (2012). Reading and Related Skills in the Early School Years: Are boys really more likely to struggle? International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 59(4), 341-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912x.2012.723939

Logan, S., & Johnston, R. (2009). Gender differences in reading ability and attitudes: examining where these differences lie. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(2), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.01389.x

Lundberg, I., Larsman, P., & Strid, A. (2012). Development of phonological awareness during the preschool year: the influence of gender and socio-economic status. Reading and Writing, 25(2), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9269-4

Mathuranath, P. S., George, A., Cherian, P. J., Alexander, A., Sarma, S. G., & Sarma, P. S. (2003). Effects of Age, Education and Gender on Verbal Fluency. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25(8), 1057-1064. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.25.8.1057.16736

Memisevic, H., Dedic, A., Biscevic, I., Hadzic, S., Pasalic, A., & Malec, D. (2020). Identifying predictors of reading speed and reading comprehension in Bosnian. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2020.1815023

Memisevic, H., Malec, D., Biscevic, I., & Pasalic, A. (2019). Predictors of Reading Fluency in Second and Third Grade Students: Results from Bosnia and Herzegovina. Studia Psychologica, 61(3), 175-188.

Merisuo‐Storm, T. (2006). Girls and Boys Like to Read and Write Different Texts. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600576039

Morris, D., Pennell, A. M., Perney, J., & Trathen, W. (2018). Using subjective and objective measures to predict level of reading fluency at the end of first grade. Reading Psychology, 39(3), 253-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2017.1418466

Mueller, S. T., & Piper, B. J. (2014). The psychology experiment building language (PEBL) and PEBL test battery. Journal of neuroscience methods, 222, 250-259.

Nalipay, M. J. N., Cai, Y., & King, R. B. (2020). Why do girls do better in reading than boys? How parental emotional contagion explains gender differences in reading achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 57(2), 310-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22330

Ostrolenk, A., d’Arc, B. F., Jelenic, P., Samson, F., & Mottron, L. (2017). Hyperlexia: Systematic review, neurocognitive modelling, and outcome. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 79, 134-149.

Papadopoulos, T. C., Spanoudis, G. C., & Georgiou, G. K. (2016). How Is RAN Related to Reading Fluency? A Comprehensive Examination of the Prominent Theoretical Accounts [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1217). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01217

Park, Y., & Kim, M. K. (2015). The quality of evidence in reading fluency intervention for Korean readers with reading difficulties and disabilities. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(4), 637-651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9404-7

Pikulski, J. J., & Chard, D. J. (2005). Fluency: Bridge Between Decoding and Reading Comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58(6), 510-519. https://doi.org/10.1598/rt.58.6.2

Powell, D., Stainthorp, R., Stuart, M., Garwood, H., & Quinlan, P. (2007). An experimental comparison between rival theories of rapid automatized naming performance and its relationship to reading. Journal of experimental child psychology, 98(1), 46-68.

Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2019). Gender differences in reading and writing achievement: Evidence from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). American Psychologist, 74(4), 445-458. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000356

Riordan, J., Reese, E., Rouse, S., & Schaughency, E. (2018). Promoting code-focused talk: The rhyme and reason for why book style matters. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 45, 69-80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.05.004

Rohde, T. E., & Thompson, L. A. (2007). Predicting academic achievement with cognitive ability. Intelligence, 35(1), 83-92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.05.004

Romeo, R. R., Christodoulou, J. A., Halverson, K. K., Murtagh, J., Cyr, A. B., Schimmel, C., Chang, P., Hook, P. E., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2017). Socioeconomic Status and Reading Disability: Neuroanatomy and Plasticity in Response to Intervention. Cerebral Cortex, 28(7), 2297-2312. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhx131

Rupley, W. H. (2009). Introduction to Direct/Explicit Instruction in Reading for the Struggling Reader: Phonemic Awareness, Phonics, Fluency, Vocabulary, and Comprehension. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25(2-3), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560802690189

Scholes, R. J. (1991). Phoneme deletion and literacy in native and non-native speakers of English. Journal of Research in Reading, 14(2), 130-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1991.tb00014.x

Shanahan, M. A., Pennington, B. F., Yerys, B. E., Scott, A., Boada, R., Willcutt, E. G., Olson, R. K., & DeFries, J. C. (2006). Processing Speed Deficits in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Reading Disability. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34(5), 584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-006-9037-8

Siegel, L. S. (1994). Working Memory and Reading: A Life-span Perspective. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 17(1), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/016502549401700107

Stuart, M. (1990). Processing strategies in a phoneme deletion task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 42(2), 305-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749008401224

Tobia, V., & Marzocchi, G. M. (2014). Predictors of reading fluency in Italian orthography: Evidence from a cross-sectional study of primary school students. Child Neuropsychology, 20(4), 449-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2013.814768

Troyer, A. K., Moscovitch, M., & Winocur, G. (1997). Clustering and switching as two components of verbal fluency: Evidence from younger and older healthy adults. Neuropsychology, 11(1), 138-146. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.11.1.138

Troyer, M., Kim, J. S., Hale, E., Wantchekon, K. A., & Armstrong, C. (2019). Relations among intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation, reading amount, and comprehension: a conceptual replication. Reading and Writing, 32(5), 1197-1218.

White, B. (2007). Are Girls Better Readers than Boys? Which Boys? Which Girls? Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 30(2), 554-581. https://doi.org/10.2307/20466650

Wolf, M., & Denckla, M. B. (2005). The rapid automatized naming and rapid alternating stimulus tests (RAN/RAS). Pro-ed.

Wolff, U. (2014). RAN as a predictor of reading skills, and vice versa: results from a randomised reading intervention. Annals of Dyslexia, 64(2), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-014-0091-6

Zoccolotti, P., de Jong, P. F., & Spinelli, D. (2016). Editorial: Understanding Developmental Dyslexia: Linking Perceptual and Cognitive Deficits to Reading Processes [Editorial]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10(140). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00140

Zumeta, R. O., Compton, D. L., & Fuchs, L. S. (2012). Using Word Identification Fluency to Monitor First-Grade Reading Development. Exceptional Children, 78(2), 201-220. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291207800204


How to Cite
Memisevic, H., Dedic, A., & Malec, D. (2022). Differentiating between Good Readers and Poor Readers: The Role of Linguistic and Cognitive Factors. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 3(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.1.235