Effects of Interaction Pattern on Students’ Interest in Keyboarding in Colleges of Education in South-West, Nigeria


  •   Ogundola Cecilia Modupe


This study examined the effects of non-verbal interaction pattern on students’ interest in keyboarding in Colleges of Education in Southwest, Nigeria.  It adopted quasi-experimental research design of pre-test, post-test non-equivalent control group design. The population for the study was 109 year one students of Office Technology and Management in state owned Colleges of Education in Southwest, Nigeria. Multistage sampling procedure was used to select 35 NCE I students in two of the Colleges offering OTM in Southwest, Nigeria, this comprised of 26 females and 9 males.  One research questions and three null hypotheses tested at 0.05 level of significance guided the study. The instrument used for data collection was the Keyboarding Interest Inventory (KII). The KII was developed by the researcher and was subjected to face and content validity by three OTM experts.   Cronbach Alpha was used to determine the internal consistency of the KII items. The reliability coefficient computed for the KII was 0.89. Mean was used to answer the research questions, while t-test was employed to test the hypotheses.   It was observed that non-verbal interaction technique was more effective in stimulating students’ interest than the conventional method in keyboarding. There was also no significant difference between the interests of students in the experimental (non-verbal) groups based on gender. It was thereafter recommended that NCCE should incorporate non-verbal interaction pattern into the teaching of keyboarding. Lecturers of keyboarding should prepare their classes in such a way that students are allowed ample opportunity to critically think, interact freely with one another, discourage students’ passiveness and improve performance in pair and group activities among other recommendations.       

Keywords: keyboarding, non-verbal interaction, office technology and management students


O. J. Akhigbe, “Effects of computer-assisted programmed instruction and demonstration method on achievement of national diploma students in keyboarding in south-south, Nigeria,” Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Faculty of Education, Ekiti State Univ., Ado-Ekiti, 2015.

O.I. Olatiilu, “Effect of classroom interaction patterns on the academic performance of Ekiti State Public Secondary School Students in Chemistry,” Unpublished M.Ed. thesis, Faculty of Education, Ekiti State Univ., Ado-Ekiti, 2016.

A. M. Osuafor, “ Effects of field trip and role playing on pupils achievement and interest in environmental concepts in primary science,” Unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Univ. of Nigeria, Nsukka, 2012.

A. O. Amiaya. (2015). Information and Communication Technology challenges and Strategies among Office Technology and Management Educators in Nigerian Polytechnics," International Journal of Education and Practice, Conscientia Beam, 3(3). pp. 156-167. https://ideas.repec.org/a/pkp/ijoeap/2015p156-167.html

C. Brewer. (2003). Computer in the classroom: How information technology can improve conservation education. http://www.ibscre.dbs.ur.nt.edu/publication/BrewerconBioarticle.pdf

A. J. Chighuson, S. L. Durtur S. L. and T. Nimfel, (2016). Perception of teachers and students on factors affecting the teaching and learning of information and communication technology courses in the polytechnics. Nigerian Journal of Business Education (NIGJBED). 3(2). pp. 216-226 http://www.nigjbed.com.ng

L. Elsie, M. Jan and M. Elsa. (2006). The relationship between keyboarding skills and self-regulated learning. South African Journal of Education. 26(2). pp. 281-293. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1150417.pdf

N. S. Ezeani, and C. M. Ogundola. (2016). Business education in Nigeria : past, present and future in the 21st century. Nigerian Journal of Business Education. , 3(1). pp. 17-33. http://www.nigjbed.com.ng/index.php/nigjbed/article/view/4

Federal Republic of Nigeria . (2013). National Policy on Education. 6th ed, NERDC Press. https://issuu.com/esspin/docs/national_policy_on_education

N. Holstermann, D. Grube, and S. Bogeholz. (2010). Hands-on activities and their influence on students’ interest. Research in Science Education. 40(5). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227294563_Hands on_Activities_and_Their_Influence_on_Students'_Interest

M. H. Judith, L. S. Jessi and J. P. Stacy. (2016). Interest Matters : The importance of promoting interest in education. Policy Insights Behavioural Brain Sciences. 3(2). 220-227. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839644/

Ngwoke, D. U. (2004). School learning theories and applications. Enugu: Magnet Business Enterprise. https://oer.unn.edu.ng/read/school-learning-theory-and-applications?rdr=1

M. N. Nrungu, G. Nyagah and M. Mugambi (2019). Learner-teacher non-verbal interaction effect on academic achievement of learners in chemistry. African Educational Research Journal. 7 (2). pp 88-96. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1221237.pdf

F. O. Nwokike, I. C. Ezeabii and E.U. Jim. (2018). Business education : an indispensable tool for achieving sustainable development in the South-East States of Nigeria. European Centre for Research Training and Development UK. British Journal of Education. 6(1). pp. 19-27. www.eajournals.org

I. P. Ogundola, G. B. Agboola and J.O. Ogunmilade. (2020). Gender differences in achievement, interest and retention of students’ exposed to fabrication and welding engineering craft practice through cognitive apprenticeship instructional technique in Nigeria,. Educational Research and Review. Academic Journals, Kenya. 15(4). pp. 194-202,

I. Uduogie. (2001). Role of teachers in motivating students’ interest in science and mathematics. International Institute for Capacity Building in Africa. 3(1). pp 1–5. www.unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000231596


How to Cite
Modupe, O. (2021). Effects of Interaction Pattern on Students’ Interest in Keyboarding in Colleges of Education in South-West, Nigeria. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 2(1), 40-45. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2021.2.1.26