Early Subitizing Development: The Role of Visuospatial Working Memory
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
The present study explored enumeration processes, serial counting and subitizing, in early childhood. Subitizing is a fast and accurate assessment of small quantities. Early quantitative processing is built off of a “parallel individuation” system, a domain-general, visuospatial system that allows infants to track small sets of objects. This system creates a precise mental model of every object in a small set, similar to subitizing. Subitizing ability helps children to acquire mature symbolic representation of numeral, and deficits in enumeration processes is associate to math disabilities. However, the role of development in enumeration processes and the role of visuospatial working memory is enumeration processes is largely unknown. Hence, in the present study, we tested visuospatial working memory’s role in subitizing development in preschoolers. We tested 3 to 5-year-old’s performance in enumeration and visuospatial working memory tasks. Performance in the subitizing range (one to four items) related to individual differences in visuospatial working memory and age, while performance for greater numericities in the serial counting range did not. Interestingly, controlling for visuospatial working memory span reduced the developmental effect of subitizing, suggesting that both visuospatial working memory and age can affect individual differences in subitizing in young children, which has implications for early childhood education.
References
-
Akin, O., & Chase, W. (1978). Quantification of three-dimensional structures. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 4(3), 397-410.
Google Scholar
1
-
Anobile, G., Cicchini, G. M., & Burr, D. C. (2016). Number As a Primary Perceptual Attribute: A Review. Perception, 45(1-2), 5-31. doi: 10.1177/0301006615602599
Google Scholar
2
-
Ashkenazi, S., Rosenberg-Lee, M., Metcalfe, A. W. S., Swigart, A. G., & Menon, V. (2013). Visuo–spatial working memory is an important source of domain-general vulnerability in the development of arithmetic cognition. Neuropsychologia, 51(11), 2305-2317. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.031
Google Scholar
3
-
Carey, S. (2001). Cognitive Foundations of Arithmetic: Evolution and Ontogenisis. Mind & Language, 16(1), 37-55. doi: 10.1111/1468-0017.00155
Google Scholar
4
-
Carey, S. (2004). Bootstrapping & the origin of concepts. Daedalus, 133, 59+.
Google Scholar
5
-
Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1994). Dissociable mechanisms of subitizing and counting: neuropsychological evidence from simultanagnosic patients. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 20(5), 958-975.
Google Scholar
6
-
Feigenson, L., Carey, S., & Hauser, M. (2002). The representations underlying infants' choice of more: object files versus analog magnitudes. Psychol Sci, 13(2), 150-156.
Google Scholar
7
-
Feigenson, L., Dehaene, S., & Spelke, E. . (2004). Core systems of number. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 307-314. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.002
Google Scholar
8
-
Formoso, J., Barreyro, J. P., Jacubovich, S., & Injoque-Ricle, I. (2017). Possible Associations between Subitizing, Estimation and Visuospatial Working Memory (VSWM) in Children. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 20. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2017.23
Google Scholar
9
-
Frye, D., Braisby, N., Lowe, J., Maroudas, C., & Nicholls, J. (1989). Young Children's Understanding of Counting and Cardinality. Child Development, 60(5), 1158-1171. doi: 10.2307/1130790
Google Scholar
10
-
Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44(1-2), 43-74.
Google Scholar
11
-
Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. . (1990). The what and how of counting. Cognition, 34(2), 197-199. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(90)90043-J
Google Scholar
12
-
Gelman, R., & Meck, E. (1983). Preschoolers' counting: principles before skill. Cognition, 13(3), 343-359.
Google Scholar
13
-
Gray, S. A., & Reeve, R. A. (2014). Preschoolers' Dot Enumeration Abilities Are Markers of Their Arithmetic Competence. PLOS ONE, 9(4), e94428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094428
Google Scholar
14
-
Halberda, J., & Feigenson, L. (2008). Developmental change in the acuity of the "number sense": The approximate number system in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1457-1465. doi: 10.1037/a0012682
Google Scholar
15
-
Hannula-Sormunen, M. M., Lehtinen, E., & Räsänen, P. (2015). Preschool Children’s Spontaneous Focusing on Numerosity, Subitizing, and Counting Skills as Predictors of Their Mathematical Performance Seven Years Later at School. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17(2-3), 155-177. doi: 10.1080/10986065.2015.1016814
Google Scholar
16
-
Jansen, B. R., Hofman, A. D., Straatemeier, M., van Bers, B. M., Raijmakers, M. E., & van der Maas, H. L. (2014). The role of pattern recognition in children's exact enumeration of small numbers. Br J Dev Psychol, 32(2), 178-194. doi: 10.1111/bjdp.12032
Google Scholar
17
-
Landerl, K., Bevan, A., & Butterworth, B. (2004). Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: a study of 8–9-year-old students. Cognition, 93(2), 99-125. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.004
Google Scholar
18
-
Le Corre, M., & Carey, S. (2007). One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles. Cognition, 105(2), 395-438. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.10.005
Google Scholar
19
-
Le Corre, M., Van de Walle, G., Brannon, E. M., & Carey, S. (2006). Re-visiting the competence/performance debate in the acquisition of the counting principles. Cognitive Psychology, 52(2), 130-169. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.07.002
Google Scholar
20
-
Leibovich, T., Henik, A., & Salti, M. (2015). Numerosity processing is context driven even in the subitizing range: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 77(Supplement C), 137-147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.016
Google Scholar
21
-
Leibovich-Raveh, T., Lewis, D. J., Kadhim, S. A. R., & Ansari, D. (2018). A new method for calculating individual subitizing ranges. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 4(2), 429-447..
Google Scholar
22
-
Mandler, G., & Shebo, B. J. (1982). Subitizing: an analysis of its component processes. Journal of experimental psychology. General, 111(1), 1-22.
Google Scholar
23
-
Piazza, M., Facoetti, A., Trussardi, A. N., Berteletti, I., Conte, S., Lucangeli, D., . . . Zorzi, M. (2010). Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia. Cognition, 116(1), 33-41. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.012
Google Scholar
24
-
Piazza, M., Fumarola, A., Chinello, A., & Melcher, D. (2011). Subitizing reflects visuo-spatial object individuation capacity. Cognition, 121(1), 147-153. doi: DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.007
Google Scholar
25
-
Piazza, M., Mechelli, A., Butterworth, B., & Price, C. J. (2002). Are Subitizing and Counting Implemented as Separate or Functionally Overlapping Processes? NeuroImage, 15(2), 435-446. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0980
Google Scholar
26
-
Piper, B. J., Li, V., Eiwaz, M. A., Kobel, Y. V., Benice, T. S., Chu, A. M., . . . Mueller, S. T. (2011). Executive function on the Psychology Experiment Building Language tests. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 110-123. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0096-6
Google Scholar
27
-
Purpura, D. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (2015). Early Numeracy Assessment: The Development of the Preschool Early Numeracy Scales. Early Education and Development, 26(2), 286-313. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2015.991084
Google Scholar
28
-
Revkin, S. K., Piazza, M., Izard, V., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2008). Does subitizing reflect numerical estimation? Psychological Science, 19(6), 607-614.
Google Scholar
29
-
Sarnecka, B. W., & Gelman, S. A. (2004). Six does not just mean a lot: preschoolers see number words as specific. Cognition, 92(3), 329-352. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.001
Google Scholar
30
-
Simon, T. J., Peterson, S., Patel, G., & Sathian, K. (1998). Do the magnocellular and parvocellular visual pathways contribute differentially to subitizing and counting? Percept Psychophys, 60(3), 451-464.
Google Scholar
31
-
Slusser, E., Ditta, A., & Sarnecka, B. (2013). Connecting numbers to discrete quantification: a step in the child's construction of integer concepts. Cognition, 129(1), 31-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.05.011
Google Scholar
32
-
Starkey, P., & Cooper, R. (1995). The development of subitizing in young children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13(4), 399-420. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1995.tb00688.x
Google Scholar
33
-
Szűcs, D. (2016). Chapter 11 - Subtypes and comorbidity in mathematical learning disabilities: Multidimensional study of verbal and visual memory processes is key to understanding. In C. Marinella & F. Wim (Eds.), Progress in Brain Research (Vol. Volume 227, pp. 277-304): Elsevier.
Google Scholar
34
-
Szucs, D., Devine, A., Soltesz, F., Nobes, A., & Gabriel, F. (2013). Developmental dyscalculia is related to visuo-spatial memory and inhibition impairment. Cortex, 49(10), 12. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2013.06.007
Google Scholar
35
-
Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1993). What enumeration studies can show us about spatial attention: evidence for limited capacity preattentive processing. Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 19(2), 331-351.
Google Scholar
36
-
Wynn, K. (1990). Children's understanding of counting. Cognition, 36(2), 155-193.
Google Scholar
37
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Sarit Ashkenazi,
Hagar Eisner,
Problem-Solving among Math Anxious Individuals: The Role of Advanced Strategy and Testing of Online Anxiety , European Journal of Education and Pedagogy: Vol. 3 No. 4 (2022)