School Principals' Informal Criteria in Assessing Their Teachers: A Comparative Study


Teacher appraisal is a necessary tool to manage staff, hire new candidates, and develop senior members. Principals use formal quantitative tools that reflect the competitive social environments in which schools operate. This study explores school principals' informal attitudes regarding the personal and professional traits they believe teachers should have or not have. Following Yariv's (2009) study we compare heads in four countries – Botswana, Romania, India, and Israel. Within a non-random convenience sampling, we held a short telephone interview (or written questionnaire) with 132 elementary and high school principals. The two most preferred traits in the entire sample were high motivation and accountability. As it turns out, school principals are less impressed by traits like professionalism or honesty. The two least preferred traits are the poorly motivated teachers and those who lack professional values and conduct. Phi and Cramer’s V test indicated a significant association between nationality and the traits of effective and ineffective teachers. The discussion analyzes the hierarchy of considerations principals maintain and the central role of the common characteristics of principalship upon national and cultural influences.

  1. Agresti, A. (2007). An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley. (accessed 10 July 2019).  |   Google Scholar
  2. Baumeister, R., & Vohs, K. (2007). Encyclopedia of Social Psychology. SAGE Publications, Inc. (p. 67).  |   Google Scholar
  3. Bădescu G., Negru-Subțirică, O., Angi, D., & Ivan, C. (2018). Profesor în România. Cine, de ce, în ce fel contribuie la educaţia elevilor în școlile românești? [Teacher in Romania. Who, why and how teach the students in Romanian schools], Perspective, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung Foundation, București.  |   Google Scholar
  4. Begley, P. (2004). Understanding evaluation processes: exploring the linkage between motivation and action. International Studies in Educational Administration, 32(2), 4-17.  |   Google Scholar
  5. Berings, D., de Fruyt, F., & Bouwen, R. (2004). Work, values and personality traits as predictors of enterprising and social vocational interests. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(2): 349-364. DOI:10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00101-6.  |   Google Scholar
  6. Boies, K., & Fiset, J. (2019). I do as I think: Exploring the alignment of Principal Cognitions and Behaviors and Its Effects on Teacher Outcomes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(2), 225-252.‏  |   Google Scholar
  7. Berry, J.W., Poortinga, Y.H., Segall, M.H., & Dasen, P.R. (2002). Cross-Cultural Psychology, Research and Applications (2nd ed.) UK: Cambridge University Press. (accessed 12 July 2019).  |   Google Scholar
  8. Branson, C.M. (2005). Exploring the concept of values-led principalship. Leading & Managing, 11 (1), 14-31.  |   Google Scholar
  9. Branson, C.M., Baig, S., & Begum, A. (2015). Personal values of principals and their manifestation in student behaviour: A district-level study in Pakistan. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(1), 107–128. DOI:  |   Google Scholar
  10. Brislin, R. (1993). Understanding Culture's Influence on Behavior. San Diego, CA, US: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.  |   Google Scholar
  11. Cleveland, J. N., & Murphy, K. R. (1992). Analyzing performance appraisal as goal-directed behavior. Research in personnel and human resources management, 10(2), 121-185.‏  |   Google Scholar
  12. Close, K., Amerin-Beardsley, A., & Collins, C. (October 2019). Mapping America's teacher evaluation plans under ESSA. Kappan, 101 (2): 22-26.  |   Google Scholar
  13. Cousins, T.A. (2019). Collegiality vs role models: gendered discourses and the ‘glass escalator’ in English primary schools. Early Years, 40(1), 37-51. DOI: 10.1080/09575146.2019.1619671.  |   Google Scholar
  14. De Albuquerque Moreira, A.M., & Rocha, M.Z.B. (2018). To Understand the “Brazilian Way” of School Management: How National Culture Influences the Organizational Culture and School Leadership. Education Science, 8 (88), 2-14.  |   Google Scholar
  15. Dean, E., Caspar, R., McAvinchey, G., Reed, L., & Quiroz, R. (2005). Developing a low-cost technique for parallel cross-cultural instrument development: The Question Appraisal System (QAS-04), International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 10 (3): 227-241. DOI: 10.1080/13645570701401032.  |   Google Scholar
  16. Derrington, M.L. & Campbell, J.W. (2018). High-stakes teacher evaluation policy: US principals’ perspectives and variations in practice. Teachers and Teaching, 24(3), 246-262.  |   Google Scholar
  17. Dimmock, C. & Walker, A. (1999). A cross-cultural approach to the study of educational leadership: An emerging framework. Journal of School Leadership, 9(4), 321-48.‏  |   Google Scholar
  18. Dimmock, C. & Walker, A. (2002). School leadership in context: Societal and organisational cultures. In: Bush T and Bell L (eds) The Principles and Practice of Educational Management Series: Educational Management, Research and Practice. London: Paul Chapman Publishing, pp. 70–85.  |   Google Scholar
  19. Engel, M. (2013). Problematic preferences? A mixed method examination of principals’ preferences for teacher characteristics in Chicago. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(1), 52-91.  |   Google Scholar
  20. Fletcher, C. & Perry, E.L. (2001). Performance appraisal and feedback: A consideration of national culture and a review of contemporary research and future trends. In N.D. Anderson et al. (Eds), Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology (pp. 127-144). London: Sage.  |   Google Scholar
  21. Gedifew, M.T. (2014). Perceptions about instructional leadership: The perspectives of a principal and teachers of Birakat Primary School in focus. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(16), 542-550.  |   Google Scholar
  22. Ghiatau, R.M. (2016). Evaluarea profesorilor. Evoluţii şi provocări [Teachers evaluation. Trends and challenges], Institutul European, Iaşi, Romania.  |   Google Scholar
  23. Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. London: Aldine Transaction.  |   Google Scholar
  24. Gliga, L. (2002). Standarde profesionale pentru cariera didactica (Profesional standards for teaching career), Romanian Education and Research Ministry, Bucharest.  |   Google Scholar
  25. Gore, J. & Rosser, B. (2020). Beyond content-focused professional development: powerful professional learning through genuine learning communities across grades and subjects. Professional Development in Education.  |   Google Scholar
  26. Harris, D.N., Rutledge, S.A., Ingle, W.K. & Thompson, C.T. (2010). Mix and match: what principals look for when hiring teachers and what this means for teacher quality policies. Education Finance and Policy, 5(2), 228-246. DOI: 10.1162/edfp.2010.5.2.5205.  |   Google Scholar
  27. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.  |   Google Scholar
  28. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.  |   Google Scholar
  29. Hofstede, G. & Hofstede, G.J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (Vol. 2). New York: Mcgraw-hill.‏  |   Google Scholar
  30. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J. & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations. Software of the mind. Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.‏  |   Google Scholar
  31. Ingle, K., Thompson, C.T and Abla, Z.W. (2018). An exploration of preferred teacher characteristics and hiring tools in Belize. Journal of Educational Administration, 56(4), 414-428.‏  |   Google Scholar
  32. Jacob, B. & Lefgren, L. (2008). Can principals identify effective teachers? Evidence on subjective performance evaluation in education. Journal of Labor Economics, 26, 101-136. DOI: 10.1086/52297.  |   Google Scholar
  33. Jacob, B.A. & Walsh, E. (2011). What's in a rating? Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 434-448.‏  |   Google Scholar
  34. Javidan, M., House, R.J., Dorfman, P.W., Hanges, P. J., & De Luque, M.S. (2006). Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: a comparative review of GLOBE's and Hofstede's approaches. Journal of international business studies, 37(6), 897-914.‏  |   Google Scholar
  35. Jawas, U. (2017). The influence of socio-cultural factors on leadership practices for instructional improvement in Indonesian schools, School Leadership & Management, 500-519. DOI: 10.1080/13632434.2017.1366440.  |   Google Scholar
  36. Kersten, T.A. & Israel, M. S. (2005). Teacher evaluation: principals’ insights and suggestions for improvement. Planning and Changing, 36(1&2), 47–67.  |   Google Scholar
  37. Kitchen, H., Fordham, E., Henderson, K., Looney, A. & Maghnouj, S. (2017). Studii OCDE privind evaluarea si examinarea in domeniul educatiei. Romania, 2017. (OECD Studies on evaluation and examination in education field. Romania, 2017).  |   Google Scholar
  38. Kremer, M., Chaudhury, N., Rogers, F., Muralidharan, K., & Hammer, J. (2005). Teacher Absence in India: A Snapshot. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(2/3), 658-667. DOI: 10.1162/1542476054473143.  |   Google Scholar
  39. Lane, J.L. (2020). Maintaining the Frame: Using Frame Analysis to Explain Teacher Evaluation Policy Implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 1-38. DOI: 10.3102/0002831219848689.  |   Google Scholar
  40. Larusdottir, S.H. (2014). Educational leadership and market values: A study of school principals in Iceland. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(4S), 83–103. DOI: 10.1177/1741143213510499.  |   Google Scholar
  41. Law, L.Y.S., Walker, A. & Dimmock, C. (2003). The influence of principals’ values on their perception and management of school problems. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(5), 498–523. DOI: 10.1108/09578230310489344.  |   Google Scholar
  42. Liu, S., Liu, C., Stronge, J. & Xu, X. (2016). Teacher characteristics for success in the classroom: Chinese principals’ perceptions for hiring decisions. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(1), 107-120.‏  |   Google Scholar
  43. Lortie, D.C. (1977). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: Chicago University Press.  |   Google Scholar
  44. Majumdar M (2001). Educational opportunities in Rajasthan and Tamil Nadu: Despair and hope. In: A. Vaidyanathan and P. R. Gopinathan Nair (eds.). Elementary Education in Rural India – A Grassroots View. Sage Publications. New Delhi, pp. 320-394.  |   Google Scholar
  45. Maxwell, J.A. (1996). Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 41. Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach. Thousand Oaks. CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.  |   Google Scholar
  46. McDonald, J.R., DiBiase, W. & Triplett, N. (2019). Principals' Perceptions of GATE Teachers. In Identifying, Describing, and Developing Teachers Who Are Gifted and Talented. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 164-174.‏ DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-5879-8.ch015.  |   Google Scholar
  47. Miller, P. (2018). ‘Culture’, ‘context’, school leadership and entrepreneurialism: Evidence from sixteen countries. Education Sciences, 8(2), 76.  |   Google Scholar
  48. Ministry of Education. (2019). Teachers Assessment: A guide for school Principals, Jerusalem. (Hebrew). (accessed 2 January 2019).  |   Google Scholar
  49. Monyatsi, P.P. (2009). A critical analysis of the mechanisms and procedures that facilitate effective teacher appraisal in Botswana schools. Educational Research and Review, 4 (4), 183-194.  |   Google Scholar
  50. Monyatsi, P., Steyn, T., & Kamper, G. (2006). Teacher perceptions of the effectiveness of teacher appraisal in Botswana. South African journal of education, 26(3), 427-441.‏ DOI: 10.4314/saje.v26i3.25080.  |   Google Scholar
  51. Murthy, J.S. (2013). Revision of Education Code for Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan. New Delhi: Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan.  |   Google Scholar
  52. Onoyase, A. (2018). Principals' Perception of Misconduct among Secondary School Teachers in Delta State: Implications for Counselling Practice. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(5), 150-157.  |   Google Scholar
  53. Nardon, L., & Steers, R. M. (2009). The culture theory jungle: Divergence and convergence in models of national culture. In R. S. Bhagat & R. M. Steers (Eds.).‏ Cambridge handbook of culture, organizations, and work (pp. 3-22). Cambridge University Press. ‏  |   Google Scholar
  54. Onyango, G. (2017). Collectivism and reporting of organizational wrongdoing in public organizations: the case of county administration in Kenya. International Review of Sociology, 27(2), 353-372.‏  |   Google Scholar
  55. Steers, R.M., Sanchez-Runde, C.J., and Nardon. L. (2010). Management across cultures: Challenges and strategies. Cambridge University Press.  |   Google Scholar
  56. NUEPA (2015). Evaluation for Improvement: School Standards and Evaluation Framework, New Delhi, India: National University of Educational Planning and Administration. www.  |   Google Scholar
  57. OECD (2013). Teachers for the 21st Century: Using Evaluation to Improve Teaching, OECD Publishing.  |   Google Scholar
  58. Orabile, M. (2020). Rari explains Botswana's education crisis, Mmegieonline. (accessed 11 April 2020).  |   Google Scholar
  59. Orphanos, S. (2014). What matters to principals when they evaluate teachers? Evidence from Cyprus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(2), 243–258.  |   Google Scholar
  60. Rahman, S.A. (2006). Attitudes of Malaysian Teachers toward a Performance-Appraisal System. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(12): 3031–3042.  |   Google Scholar
  61. Rajput, J.S. & Walia, K. (1998). Assessing teacher effectiveness in India: Overview and critical appraisal. Prospects, 28(1), 137-150. DOI:10.1007/BF02737785.  |   Google Scholar
  62. Ramachandran, V., Sharma, J., Pal, M., Jain, S. & Shekar, S. (2006). Teacher Motivation in India. Working Papers (accessed 23 September 2012).  |   Google Scholar
  63. Reid, D.B. (2019). What information do principals consider when evaluating teachers? School Leadership & Management, DOI: 10.1080/13632434.2019.1576167.  |   Google Scholar
  64. Roniger, L. & Feige, M. (1993). The Freier culture and the Israeli identity. Alpayim (2000), 7, 118-136. (Hebrew).  |   Google Scholar
  65. Schwartz, S.H. & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 92–116. DOI: 10.1177/0022022195261007.  |   Google Scholar
  66. Shapira-Lishchinsky, O. & Litchka, P.R. (2018). The relationship between teachers’ perceptions of transformational leadership practices and the social ecological model: Universal versus national culture. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(3),00-00.  |   Google Scholar
  67. Smith, P. B., Dugan, S., & Trompenaars, F. (1996). National culture and the values of organizational employees: A dimensional analysis across 43 nations. Journal of cross-cultural psychology, 27(2), 231-264.‏  |   Google Scholar
  68. Spencer-Oatey, H. (2000). Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures. London, Continuum.  |   Google Scholar
  69. Steinberg, M. P. & Donaldson, M. L. (2016). The new Educational Accountability: Understanding the Landscape of Teacher Evaluation in the Post-NCLB era. Education Finance and Policy, 11 (3), 340–359.  |   Google Scholar
  70. Strauss, A.L. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc  |   Google Scholar
  71. Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (2011). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business. Nicholas Brealey International.‏  |   Google Scholar
  72. Walker, A. & Dimmock, C. (2000). One Size Fits All? Teacher Appraisal in a Chinese Culture, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(2), 155-178. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008106803772.  |   Google Scholar
  73. West, C., Baker, A., Ehrich, J.F., Woodcock, S., Bokosmaty, S., Howard, S.J. & Eady, M.J. (2018). Teacher Disposition Scale (TDS): construction and psychometric validation, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 44(2), 185-200.  |   Google Scholar
  74. Yair,G.(2011). The Code of Israeliness: The Ten Commandments of the 21st Century. Tel Aviv: Keter-Books.  |   Google Scholar
  75. Yariv, E. (2009). Principals' informal methods for evaluating poor-performing teachers, Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 283-298. DOI: 10.1007/s11092-009-9081-3.  |   Google Scholar
  76. Yariv, E. (2004). Challenging teachers: what difficulties do they pose to their principals, Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 32, 165-184.  |   Google Scholar
  77. Yi, P. & Kim, H.J. (2019). Exploring the relationship between external and internal accountability in education: A cross-country analysis with multi-level structural equation modeling, International Journal of Educational Development, 65, 1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.12.007.  |   Google Scholar

How to Cite

Lahiri, S., Yariv, E., & Butnaru, S. (2022). School Principals’ Informal Criteria in Assessing Their Teachers: A Comparative Study. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 3(3), 160–170.

Search Panel

 Sudeshna Lahiri, Professor
 Google Scholar |   EJEDU Journal

 Eliezer Yariv
 Google Scholar |   EJEDU Journal

 Simona Butnaru
 Google Scholar |   EJEDU Journal