The Impact of a Planned Strategy of Early Scientific Research Training on Medical Students’ Research Productivity



Abstract Views
266

Downloads
203

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Apr 11, 2022
Published Apr 29, 2022
10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.2.332

Abstract viewed = 266 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Student Research and Innovation Program (SRIP) is one of the major training programmes and is broadly used to promote students’ ability of scientific research. However, the exact impact of a planned strategy of early SRIP on the research productivity of medical students remains unknown. Here we conducted a complete and reliable questionnaire survey to investigate the situation of early SRIP in improving the research interests and the academic index was used to evaluate the research productivity in medical students. The results showed that more than half of medical students at Ningbo University School of Medicine participated in SRIPs in junior grades. Personal interest was a major motive and selective criteria for SRIP. Meanwhile, SRIP was found to be self-managed and well arranged in medical students. Interestingly, early scientific research training benefited students in both academic and non-academic achievements. The statistical analysis showed that the freshman participants yielded the most productive academic achievements. Additionally, the planned SRIP is considered useful, challengeable, and supportive for medical students. These findings reveal the potential value of the wider implementation of early SRIP throughout the school years in enhancing the research ability of medical students.

 

Keywords: Medical Education, Research Productivity, Scientific Research, Student Research Innovation Program, Undergraduate

References

  1. Amgad, M., Tsui, M. M. K., Liptrott, S. J., & Shash, E. (2015, Jun 18). Medical Student Research: An Integrated Mixed-Methods Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Plos One, 10(6). https://doi.org/ARTN e012747010.1371/journal.pone.0127470
     Google Scholar
  2. Bevitt, S. (2015, Jan 2). Assessment innovation and student experience: a new assessment challenge and call for a multi-perspective approach to assessment research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), 103-119. ://WOS:000346052500008
     Google Scholar
  3. Brown, A., Nidumolu, A., Stanhope, A., Koh, J., Greenway, M., & Grierson, L. (2018, Jul). Can first-year medical students acquire quality improvement knowledge prior to substantial clinical exposure? A mixed-methods evaluation of a pre-clerkship curriculum that uses education as the context for learning. Bmj Quality & Safety, 27(7), 576-582. ://WOS:000439842800011
     Google Scholar
  4. Brown, A. M., Lewis, S. N., & Bevan, D. R. (2016, Sep-Oct). Development of a Structured Undergraduate Research Experience: Framework and Implications. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 44(5), 463-474. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20975
     Google Scholar
  5. Cepanec, D., Humphries, A., Rieger, K. L., Marshall, S., Londono, Y., & Clarke, D. (2016, May). Building Graduate Student Capacity as Future Researchers Through a Research and Training Award Program. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(5), 284-287. ://WOS:000377382500008
     Google Scholar
  6. Dacre, J., & Johnson, M. (2017, Feb 4). Research for all, benefits all. Lancet, 389(10068), 499-500. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30144-7
     Google Scholar
  7. Darzi, A., & Kibasi, T. (2009, Jun 20). Could the UK lead the world in medical education and training? Lancet, 373(9681), 2095-2096. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60733-9
     Google Scholar
  8. de Oliveira, N. A., Luz, M. R., Saraiva, R. M., & Alves, L. A. (2011, Jul). Student views of research training programmes in medical schools. Medical Education, 45(7), 748-755. ://WOS:000291424500015
     Google Scholar
  9. DeLuca, G. C., Ovseiko, P. V., & Buchan, A. M. (2016, Jan 13). Personalized medical education: Reappraising clinician-scientist training. Science Translational Medicine, 8(321). ://WOS:000368510800002
     Google Scholar
  10. Dicianno, B. E., Glick, R. M., Sowa, G. A., & Boninger, M. L. (2016, Oct). Processes and Outcomes from a Medical Student Research Training Program in Integrative, Complementary, and Alternative Medicine. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 95(10), 779-786. ://WOS:000384447800014
     Google Scholar
  11. Elharram, M., Dinh, T., Lalande, A., Ge, S., Gao, S., & Noel, G. (2017, Mar-Apr). Global Health Values of a Multidirectional Near Peer Training Program in Surgery, Pathology, Anatomy, Research Methodology, and Medical Education for Haitian, Rwandan, and Canadian Medical Students. Annals of Global Health, 83(2), 274-280. ://WOS:000406008800006
     Google Scholar
  12. Fang, D., & Meyer, R. E. (2003, Dec). Effect of two Howard Hughes Medical Institute research training programs for medical students on the likelihood of pursuing research careers. Academic Medicine, 78(12), 1271-1280. ://WOS:000220071200015
     Google Scholar
  13. Galeano, N., Morales-Menendez, R., & Cantu, F. J. (2012). Developing Research Skills in Undergraduate Students through an Internship Program in Research and Innovation. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(1), 48-56. ://WOS:000300483000006
     Google Scholar
  14. Jorgensen, F., & Hanssen, T. E. S. (2018, Dec). Research incentives and research output. Higher Education, 76(6), 1029-1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0238-1
     Google Scholar
  15. Li, X. F., Chen, X. J., Li, H. Q., Chen, L. N., & Xu, X. J. (2018, Nov). Application research of program management in medical students' emergency ability training. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 123, 21-21. ://WOS:000451421700033
     Google Scholar
  16. Luft, F. C. (2016, Apr). A visionary scientist selects clinicians for clinical research. Journal of Molecular Medicine-Jmm, 94(4), 371-372. ://WOS:000375716300001
     Google Scholar
  17. Malak, M. A. (2017, Apr). Quality Improvement in Medical Education: Implications for Curriculum Change. Academic Medicine, 92(4), 431-432. ://WOS:000398917500017
     Google Scholar
  18. Mark, A. L., & Kelch, R. P. (2001, Nov). Clinician Scientist Training Program: A proposal for training medical students in clinical research. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 49(6), 486-490. ://WOS:000172227800008
     Google Scholar
  19. Morales, D. X., Grineski, S. E., & Collins, T. W. (2016, Sep 1). Influences on Faculty Willingness to Mentor Undergraduate Students from Another University as Part of an Interinstitutional Research Training Program. Cbe-Life Sciences Education, 15(3). ://WOS:000388096500011
     Google Scholar
  20. Nappo, S. A., Iafrate, G. B., & Sanchez, Z. M. (2013, Jan 10). Motives for participating in a clinical research trial: a pilot study in Brazil. Bmc Public Health, 13. https://doi.org/Artn 1910.1186/1471-2458-13-19
     Google Scholar
  21. Niessen, C. M., & Krieg, T. (2014, Feb). Clinician Scientists and PhDs: The Need to Connect Basic Research to Translational Medicine - A Personal Experience. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 134(2), 295-298. ://WOS:000329896000001
     Google Scholar
  22. Ramirez-Velez, R., Correa-Bautista, J. E., Munoz-Rodriguez, D. I., Ramirez, L., Gonzalez-Ruiz, K., Dominguez-Sanchez, M. A., Duran-Palomino, D., Girabent-Farres, M., Florez-Lopez, M. E., & Bagur-Calafat, M. C. (2015, Jan-Mar). Evidence-based practice: beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and skills among Colombian physical therapists. Colombia Medica, 46(1), 33-40. https://doi.org/DOI 10.25100/cm.v46i1.1654
     Google Scholar
  23. Rezhake, R., Hu, S. Y., Zhao, Y. Q., Zhang, L., Zhao, X. L., Dominguez, A. Z., Qiao, Y. L., Zhou, C. H., & Zhao, F. H. (2018, Jun). Impact of International Collaborative Training Programs on Medical Students' Research Ability. Journal of Cancer Education, 33(3), 511-516. ://WOS:000432153400005
     Google Scholar
  24. Saiki, T., Imafuku, R., & Suzuki, Y. (2018). Medical school choice and quality of undergraduate education. Medical Teacher, 40(9), 974-974. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2018.1465538
     Google Scholar
  25. Shen, B., Dumenco, L., Dollase, R., & George, P. (2016, May). The importance of quality improvement education for medical students. Medical Education, 50(5), 567-568. ://WOS:000374562700016
     Google Scholar
  26. Song, P., Jin, C., & Tang, W. (2017). New medical education reform in China: Towards healthy China 2030. Biosci Trends, 11(4), 366-369. https://doi.org/10.5582/bst.2017.01198
     Google Scholar
  27. Tafur-Cotrina, D., Moreno-Roman, P., Saito-Diaz, K., & Espinoza, S. (2014, Dec). Research Experience for Peruvian Undergraduates (REPU): A sustainable student-run scientific training program for STEM undergraduates in developing countries. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 25. ://WOS:000352094102055
     Google Scholar
  28. The, L. (2017, Jul 22). Medical education reform in China. Lancet, 390(10092), 334. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31921-9
     Google Scholar
  29. Wiegant, F., Scager, K., & Boonstra, J. (2011, Mar). An Undergraduate Course to Bridge the Gap between Textbooks and Scientific Research. Cbe-Life Sciences Education, 10(1), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-08-0100
     Google Scholar
  30. Wolkow, T. D., Durrenberger, L. T., Maynard, M. A., Harrall, K. K., & Hines, L. M. (2014, Dec 1). A Comprehensive Faculty, Staff, and Student Training Program Enhances Student Perceptions of a Course-Based Research Experience at a Two-Year Institution. Cbe-Life Sciences Education, 13(4), 724-737. ://WOS:000345766800018
     Google Scholar
  31. Yin, H. B., & Ke, Z. (2017). Students' course experience and engagement: an attempt to bridge two lines of research on the quality of undergraduate education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(7), 1145-1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1235679
     Google Scholar