##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The development of a curriculum poses a challenge for theoreticians, practitioners and educational policy makers. The official curriculum of a country represents the guidelines that should serve as the basis on which practices are developed in educational institutions. However, every institution modifies and applies the curriculum differently. The level of a practitioner’s professional development, as well as the culture of the educational institution in question profoundly influence the manner in which the curriculum is evolving in a particular educational institution. For that reason, it is especially important to facilitate access to systematic and high-quality professional development for preschool teachers, so that they are capable of developing the curriculum in line with the challenges of our time and contemporary scientific findings on early childhood education and care. The practice of many preschool teachers in Croatia reflects an outdated understanding of educational work involving children, and the official curriculum does not have much of an impact on that fact. Despite the fact that the practices of individual preschool teachers, even within the same institution, can differ significantly, there are certain shared traditionalisms that represent a burden for practice in Croatian preschools, and that are not easily removed. In order to gradually remove them, i.e., replace them with more contemporary methods of educating children, it is necessary to first become aware of them, as it is precisely the lack of awareness that such traditionalisms exist that causes them to remain a part of the practice.

References

  1. Bauman, Z. (2001). The Individualized Society, Cambridge: Polity Cambridge Press.
     Google Scholar
  2. Carr, M. (2001). Assessment in early childhood settings: Learning stories. London: Sage.
     Google Scholar
  3. Carr, M. (2005). Beyond listening: Can assessment practice play a part? In Clark, A., Kjorholt, A.T. and Moss, P. (Eds.) Beyond listening: Children’s perspectives on early childhood services (pp. 129–150). Bristol: Policy Press.
     Google Scholar
  4. Dahlberg, G., Moss, P. & Pence, A. (1999). Beyond Quality in Early Childhood Education and Care: Postmodern perspectives. London: Falmer Press.
     Google Scholar
  5. Edwards, C.; Gandini, L. & Forman, G. (Eds.) (1998). The Hundred Languages of Children-The Reggio Emilia Approach-Advanced Reflections. Lonton: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
     Google Scholar
  6. Fang He, M., Schultz, B. D. and Schubert, W. H. (2015). The SAGE Guide to Curriculum in Education. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, Boston: SAGE.
     Google Scholar
  7. Goodson, I.F. (2014). Curriculum, Personal Narrative and Social Future. London and NY: Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  8. Hostyn, I., Mäkitalo, A.R., Hakari, S. & Vandenbussche, L. (2018). The professional actuation of pedagogical documentation in Belgian and Finnish early childhood education settings. Early Child Development and Care, DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2018.1475368. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2018.1475368.
     Google Scholar
  9. Jaramillo, N.E. (2015). Techers and pedagogy for communal well-being. In: Fang He, M., Schultz, B. D. and Schubert, W. H., The SAGE guide to curriculum in education (pp.165–173). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, Boston: SAGE.
     Google Scholar
  10. Kazembe, L., Lessing, A. (2015). Teachers as improvisational artists. In: In: Fang He, M., Schultz, B. D. and Schubert, W. H., The SAGE Guide to Curriculum in Education (pp. 223–230). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, Boston: SAGE.
     Google Scholar
  11. Kelly, A.V. (2009). The curriculum, theory and practice, 6th edition. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: SAGE.
     Google Scholar
  12. Krechevsky, M., Rivard, M., & Burton, F. R. (2010). Accountability in three realms: making learning visible inside and outside the classroom. Theory into Practice, 49(1), 64–71.
     Google Scholar
  13. Krechevsky, M., Mardell, B., Rivard, M., & Wilson, D. (2013). Visible Learners. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
     Google Scholar
  14. Nacionalni kurikulum za rani i predškolski odgoj i obrazovanje, Narodne novine, 5/2015 [National curriculum for early and preschool education]. https://www.azoo.hr/images/strucni2015/Nacionalni-kurikulum-za-rani-i-predskolski-odgoj-i-obrazovanje.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  15. Null, W. (2015). Deciding aims and purposes of subject matter. In: Fang He, M., Schultz, B. D. and Schubert, W. H., The SAGE Guide to Curriculum in Education (pp. 3–10). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC, Boston: SAGE.
     Google Scholar
  16. Peters, S. (1998). Playing games and learning mathematics: the results of two intervention studies. International Journal of Early Childhood Education, 6 (1), 49–58.
     Google Scholar
  17. Pettersson, K.E. (2014). Playing a part in preschool documentation. A study of how participation is enacted in preschool documentation practices and how it is affected by material agents. Linköping University, Sweden: Linköping Studies in Pedagogic Practices No. 21. Linköping Studies in Education and Social Sciences No. 4.
     Google Scholar
  18. Porter, A., McMaken, J., Hwang, J., and Yang, R. (2011). Common core standards: The new U.S. intended curriculum. Educational Research, 40(3), 102–116.
     Google Scholar
  19. Rinaldi, C. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: listening, researching, and learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  20. Slunjski, E. (2011), Kurikulum ranog odgoja-istraživanje i konstrukcija [Curriculum of early education - research and construction.]. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.
     Google Scholar
  21. Te Whariki (2017). https://education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Early-Childhood/ELS-Te-Whariki-Early-Childhood-Curriculum-ENG-Web.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  22. Veenman, M. V. J. (2006). The role of intellectual and metacognitive skills in math problem-solving. In: A. Desoete and M. V. J. Veenman (Eds.), Metacognition in Mathematics Education (pp. 149–161). Nova Science Publishers.
     Google Scholar
  23. Wood, E., Attfield, J. (2011). Play, learning and the early childhood curriculum. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: SAGE.
     Google Scholar