##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Despite the high prevalence of co-teaching in EFL classes around the globe because of its numerous advantages, it is noticed that its implementation is below the expectation in the Moroccan context because of various reasons. This article’s fundamental objectives are twofold: It investigates the successful implementation of this approach from teacher trainers’ perspectives and the appropriate model that can be applied smoothly and successfully in the Moroccan EFL context. An online questionnaire is used to collect data about teacher trainers’ attitudes toward the suitable model that can be applied in the Moroccan English classes. The preliminary results of this article unveil that teacher trainers have a positive attitude toward the implementation of co-teaching. Nonetheless, there are some individual, psychological, and institutional constraints that impede its implementation. Therefore, getting rid of individual culture and encouraging the habit of co-operating among pupils along with recruiting more professional teacher trainers to raise teachers’ trainees and experienced teachers’ awareness of the importance of this approach are the most effective solution to apply it successfully in Moroccan EFL classrooms.

References

  1. Al-Saaideh, M. A. (2010). A rationale to adopt team teaching in prevocational education in Jordan. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 37(4),269–285.
     Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. S., & Speck, B. W. (1998). Oh, what a difference a team makes: Why team teaching makes a difference. Teaching and teacher education, 14(7), 671–686.
     Google Scholar
  3. Austin, M. P., Mitchell, P., & Goodwin, G. M. (2001). Cognitive deficits in depression: possible implications for functional neuropathology. The British journal of psychiatry, 178(3), 200–206.
     Google Scholar
  4. Badiali, B., & Titus, N. E. (2010). Co-teaching: Enhancing student learning through mentor-intern partnerships. School-University Partnerships, 4(2), 74–80.
     Google Scholar
  5. Baeten, M., & Simons, M. (2014). Student teachers’ team teaching: Models, effects, and conditions for implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41, 92–110.
     Google Scholar
  6. Birrell, J. R., & Bullough Jr, R. V. (2005). Teaching with a peer: A follow-up study of the 1st year of teaching. Action in Teacher Education, 27(1), 72–81.
     Google Scholar
  7. Boland, D. E., Alkhalifa, K. B., & Al-Mutairi, M. A (2019). Co-teaching in efl classroom: the promising model. English Language Teaching, 12(12), 95–98.
     Google Scholar
  8. Bullough Jr, R. V. (2002). Practicing theory and theorizing practice in teacher education. In Teaching about teaching (pp. 27-45). Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  9. Bullough Jr, R. V., Young, J., Birrell, J. R., Clark, D. C., Egan, M. W., Erickson, L. & Welling, M. (2003). Teaching with a peer: A comparison of two models of student teaching. Teaching and teacher education, 19(1), 57–73.
     Google Scholar
  10. Burns, V. F., & Mintzberg, S. (2019). Co-teaching as teacher training: Experiential accounts of two doctoral students. College teaching, 67(2), 94–99.
     Google Scholar
  11. Chitiyo, J. (2017). Challenges to the use of co-teaching by teachers. International Journal of Whole schooling, 13(3), 55–66.
     Google Scholar
  12. Chen, C. W., and Y. S. Cheng. 2010. A case study on foreign English teachers challenges in Taiwanese elementary schools. System, 38, 41–49.
     Google Scholar
  13. Cook, L., & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on exceptional children, 28.
     Google Scholar
  14. Dee, A. (2012). Collaborative clinical practice: an alternate field experience. Issues in Teacher Education, 21(2), 147e163.
     Google Scholar
  15. Dugan, K., & Letterman, M. (2008). Student appraisals of collaborative teaching. College Teaching, 56(1), 11–15
     Google Scholar
  16. Easterby-Smith, M., &Olve, N. G. (1984). Team teaching: making management education more student-centered? Management Education and Development, 15(3), 221–236.
     Google Scholar
  17. Gardiner, W., & Robinson, K. S. (2009). Paired field placements: A means for collaboration. The New Educator, 5(1), 81–94.
     Google Scholar
  18. Friend, M., & Cook, L. (2007). Co-teaching. Interactions-collaboration professionals (5th ed.). Boston MA: Pearson.
     Google Scholar
  19. Goodnough, K., Osmond, P., Dibbon, D., Glassman, M., & Stevens, K. (2009). Exploring a triad model of student teaching: pre-service teacher and cooperating teacher perceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 85e296. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.10.003.
     Google Scholar
  20. Graziano, K. J., & Navarrete, L. A. (2012). Co-teaching in a teacher education classroom: Collaboration, compromise, and creativity. Issues in Teacher Education, 21(1), 109–126.
     Google Scholar
  21. Gurman, E. B. (1989). The effect of prior test exposure on performance in two instructional settings. The Journal of Psychology, 123(3), 275–278.
     Google Scholar
  22. Hang, Q., &Rabren, K. (2009). An examination of o-teaching: Perspectives and efficacy indicators. Remedial and special education, 30(5), 259–268.
     Google Scholar
  23. Helms, J. E., Jernigan, M., &Mascher, J. (2005). The meaning of race in psychology and how to change it: a methodological perspective. American psychologist, 60(1), 27.
     Google Scholar
  24. Honigsfeld, A., & Dove, M. (2008). Co-teaching in the ESL classroom. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 74(2), 8.
     Google Scholar
  25. Helms, M. M., Alvis, J. M., & Willis, M. (2005). Planning and implementing shared teaching: An MBA team-teaching case study. Journal of Education for Business, 81(1), 29–34.
     Google Scholar
  26. Kamens, M. W. (2007). Learning about co-teaching: A collaborative student teaching experience for pre-service teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education, 30(3), 155–166.
     Google Scholar
  27. Kurtts, S. A., & Levin, B. B. (2000). Using peer coaching with pre-service teachers to develop reflective practice and collegial support. Teaching Education, 11(3), 297–310.
     Google Scholar
  28. Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Graetz, J., Norland, J., Gardizi, W., & Mcduffie, K. (2005). Case studies in co-teaching in the content areas: Successes, failures, and challenges. Intervention in school and clinic, 40(5), 260–270.
     Google Scholar
  29. Murawski, W. W. (2006). Student outcomes in co-taught secondary English classes: How can we improve? Reading & Writing quarterly, 22(3), 227–247.
     Google Scholar
  30. Pancsofar, N., & Petroff, J. G. (2013). Professional development experiences in co-teaching: Associations with teacher confidence, interests, and attitudes. Teacher education and special education, 36(2), 83–96.
     Google Scholar
  31. Nevin, A. I., Thousand, J. S., & Villa, R. A. (2009). Collaborative teaching for teacher educators-Whatdoes the research say? Teaching and teacher education, 25(4), 569–574.
     Google Scholar
  32. Pancsofar, N., & Petroff, J. G. (2013). Professional development experiences in co-teaching: Associations with teacher confidence, interests, and attitudes. Teacher education and special education, 36(2)83–96.
     Google Scholar
  33. Parsons, M., & Stephenson, M. (2005). Developing reflective practice in student teachers: Collaboration and critical partnerships. Teachers and teaching, 11(1), 95–116.
     Google Scholar
  34. Richards, J. C., Richards, J. C., & Farrell, T. S (2005). Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  35. Roth, W. M., & Tobin, K. (2001). The implications of co-teaching/cogenerative dialogue for teacher evaluation: Learning from multiple perspectives of everyday practice. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15(1), 7–29.
     Google Scholar
  36. Sluti, D. G., Lebsack, R. R., &Lebsack, S. A. (2004). Team-Teaching: Faculty and Student Perceptions of benefits and Detriments. UNK/CTE: Compendium of Teaching Resources and Ideas, 97–109.
     Google Scholar
  37. Sorensen, P. (2004). Learning to teach collaboratively: the use of subject pairs in the school practicum. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 32,1–24.
     Google Scholar
  38. Terès Arcarons, C., & Escobar Urmeneta, C. (2021). Coteaching in foreign language education (FLE) Contexts: a narrative of a co-teaching experience. [Master dissertation, University of Barcelona]. https://ddd.uab.cat/record/230669.
     Google Scholar
  39. Britton, L. R., & Anderson, K. A. (2010). Peer coaching and pre-service teachers: Examining an underutilized concept. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 306–314.
     Google Scholar
  40. Vacilotto, S., & Cummings, R. (2007). Peer coaching in TEFL/TESL programs. ELT journal, 61(2), 153–160.
     Google Scholar
  41. Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
     Google Scholar
  42. Walsh, K., & Elmslie, L. (2005). Practicum pairs: An alternative for first field experience in early childhood teacher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), 5–21.
     Google Scholar