Peer Teaching in Medical Education: Highlighting the Benefits and Challenges of Its Implementation

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

  •   Verona Sukrajh

  •   Adegoke Olusegun Adefolalu

Abstract

Peer teaching is an educational strategy that embraces active learning, it explores the social dynamics and interactions as well as the communication and interpersonal skills that influence learning. Embedded within peer teaching as an educational strategy are several theories which promote active learning. It is very important to have a good understanding of the various philosophies underpinning the learning process, because of the numerous variables that have to be considered in order to make the implementation of peer teaching a successful exercise in the context of medical education. Based on the outcome of an extensive literature review together with field experience of the authors, the focus of the current paper will be to highlight the benefits and challenges that should be anticipated by medical educators who want to introduce peer teaching into their teaching and learning activities as part of innovation that would enhance active learning among their students.


Keywords: Peer teaching, medical education, medical students, educational strategy, active learning

References

DE. Karakitsiou, A. Markou, P. Kyriakou, M. Pieri, M. Abuaita E. Bourgousis, T. Hido, A. Tsatsaragkou, A. Boukali, C. de Burbure and IDK. Dimoliatis. The good student is more than a listener: The 12+1 roles of the medical student. Medical Teacher, vol. 34, pp. 1-8, 2012.

RB. Bagg, and J. Tagg. From learning to teaching – A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 12-25, 1995.

CC. Bonwell, and JA. Elison. Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom. George Washington University. Ashe-Eric Higher Education Report 1, Washington DC, 1991.

AW. Chickering, and ZF. Gamson. Seven principles for good practice. American Association for Higher Education (AAHE) Bulletin, vol. 39, pp. 3-7. 1987.

A. Flexner. Medical Education in the United States and Canada, Bulletin Number Four. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, New York, 1910.

DCM. Taylor, and H. Hamdy. Adult learning theories: Implications for learning and teaching in medical education: AMEE Guide No 83. Medical Teacher, vol. 35, pp. e156-e1572, 2013.

RS. Grabinger, and JC. Dunlap. Rich environments for active learning: a definition. Association for Learning Technology Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 5-34, 1995.

J, Frenk, L. Chen, ZA. Bhutta, J. Cohen, N. Crisp, T. Evans, H. Fineberg, P. Garcia, Y. Ke, P. Kelley, B. Kistnasamy, A. Meleis, D. Naylor, A. Pablos-Mendez, S. Reddy, S. Scrimshaw, J. Sepulveda, D. Serwadda, and H. Zurayk. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. The Lancet, vol. 376, no. 9756, pp. 1923-1958, 2010.

O. Ten Cate, and S. Durning. Dimensions and psychology of peer teaching in medical education. Medical Teacher, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 546-552, 2007.

KJ. Topping. The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. Higher Education, vol. 32, pp. 321-345, 1996.

B. Graffam. Active learning in medical education: Strategies for beginning implementation. Medical Teacher, vol. 29, pp. 38-42, 2007.

D. Boud, R. Cohen, and J. Sampson. Peer learning in higher education: learning from and with each other. Kogan Page, UK, 2001.

MT. Ross, and S. Cameron. Peer assisted learning: a planning and implementation framework: AMME Guide No 30. Medical Teacher, vol. 29, pp. 527-545, 2007.

KJ. Topping, and S. Ehly. (Eds.). Peer-assisted learning. Mahwah NJ and London UK: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1998.

M. Dandavino, L. Snell, and J. Wiseman. Why medical students should learn how to teach? Medical Teacher, vol. 29, pp. 558-565, 2007.

JM. Lockyer, CS. Hodgson, T. Lee, S. Faremo, B. Fisher, W. Dafoe, V. Yin, and V. Claudo. Clinical teaching as part of continuing professional development: does teaching enhance clinical performance. Medical Teacher, vol. 38, pp. 815-822, 2016.

TM. Lockspeiser, P. O’Sullivan, A. Teherami, and J. Muller. Understanding the experience of being taught by peers: the value of social and cognitive congruence. Advances in Health Science Education, vol. 13, pp. 361-372, 2008.

M. Stigmar. Peer to peer teaching in higher education: a critical literature review. Mentoring and tutoring: Partnership in learning, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 124-136, 2016.

RA. Kusurkar, G. Croiset, and THJ. Ten Cate. Twelve tips to stimulate intrinsic motivation in students through autonomy supportive classroom teaching derived from self-determination theory. Medical Teacher, vol. 33, pp. 978-982, 2011.

M. Manyama, R. Stafford, E. Mazyala, A. Lukanima, N. Magele, BR. Kidenya, E. Kimwaga, S. Msuya and J. Kauki. Improving gross anatomy learning using reciprocal peer teaching. BMC Medical Education, vol. 16, pp. 95, 2016.

CL. Chou, DE. Masters, A. Chang, M. Kruidering and KE. Hauer. Effects of longitudinal small group learning on delivery and receipt of communication skills feedback. Medical Education, vol. 47, pp. 1073-1079, 2013.

L. Dyche. Interpersonal skill in medicine: the essential partner of verbal communication. Society of General Internal Medicine, vol. 22, pp. 1035-1039, 2007.

Duffy, F.D., Gordon, G.H., Whelan, G., Cole-Kelly, K. & Frankel, R. 2004. American Medicine. 79(6):495-507.

Frank, J.R., Snell, L. & Sherbino, J. (Ed). CanMEDS 2015 Physician Competency Framework. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, Ottawa, 2015.

JN. Modi, AJ. Chhatwal, P. Gupta, and T. Singh. Teaching and assessing communication skills in medical undergraduate training. Indian Pediatrics. vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 497-504, 2016.

SJ. Wayne, SA. Fortner, JA. Kitzes, C. Timm, and S. Kalishman. Cause and effect? The relationship between student’s perception of the medical school learning environment and academic performance on USMLE Step 1. Medical Teacher, vol. 35, pp. 376-380, 2013.

M.T. Ross, and S. Cameron, S. Peer assisted learning: a planning and implementation framework: AMME Guide No 30. Medical Teacher, vol. 29, pp. 527-545, 2007.

C. Bulte, A. Betts, K. Garner and S. During. Student teaching: views of student near-peer teachers and learners. Medical Teacher, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 583-590, 2007.

P. Aggarwal. Social loafing on group projects structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 255-264, 2008.

D.M. Torre, C. van der Vleuten, and D. Dolmans. Theoretical perspectives and applications of group learning in Problem-based learning. Medical Teacher, vol 38. pp. 189-195, 2016.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Sukrajh, V., & Adefolalu, A. (2021). Peer Teaching in Medical Education: Highlighting the Benefits and Challenges of Its Implementation. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 2(1), 64-68. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2021.2.1.52