##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The COVID-19 pandemic changed the educational landscape in the Philippines as schools transitioned to flexible instruction delivery far from the default face-to-face platform. This calls for adjustment and recalibration in the instructional practices and, more importantly, in assessing the student’s learning outcomes. The current study is a qualitative inquiry exploring the experiences of Junior High School secondary science teachers in the execution of the four facets of assessment in the context of flexible instruction: their assessment obligations; expected outcomes in assessing science learners; obstacles hindering assessment practices; and opportunities brought by the new platform of assessing science learning. Findings from this study uncovered that continuity of teaching and learning during the health crisis brought new expectations from the teachers as assessors of learning while adhering to the essential core learning outcomes. At the same time, though direct and indirect challenges were perceived to complicate the assessment process, various opportunities emerged, highlighting new practices that can be applied in the context. The results offered implications for policy, research, and practice.

References

  1. Abante, A., Cruz, R., Guevarra, D., Lanada, M. I. B., Macale, M. J. S., Roque, M. W. B., ... & Cabrera, W. C. (2021). A comparative analysis on the challenges of online learning modality and modular learning modality: A basis for training program. International journal of multidisciplinary research and analysis, 4(04), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijmra/v4-i4-17.
     Google Scholar
  2. Abulencia, A. (2011) The social purposes of learning assessment, Philippine Normal University Journal on Teacher Education, The Normal Lights, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.2121/atikan-journal.v1i1.109.g109.
     Google Scholar
  3. Adov, L., & Mäeots, M. (2021). What can we learn about science teachers’ technology use during the COVID-19 Pandemic? Education Sciences, 11(6), 255. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060255.
     Google Scholar
  4. Aliyyah, R. R., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., Syaodih, E., Nurtanto, M., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). The perceptions of primary school teachers of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic period: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 90–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/388.
     Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, R. M., Heesterbeek, H., Klinkenberg, D., & Hollingsworth, T. D. (2020). How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID- 19 epidemic? The Lancet, 395(10228), 931-934 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 6736(20)30567-5
     Google Scholar
  6. Arrieta, G. S. (2020). The experiences of junior high school teachers in online teaching and learning during enhanced community quarantine: inputs for the learning continuity plan for the new normal in education. Jayapangus Press Books, 383–404.
     Google Scholar
  7. Asian Development Bank (ADB) (2021). Learning and earning losses from covid-19 school closures in developing Asia. Mandaluyong, Philippines.
     Google Scholar
  8. Basilaia, G., Dgebuadze, M., Kantaria, M., & Chokhonelidze, G. (2020). Replacing the classic learning form at universities as an immediate response to the COVID-19 virus infection in Georgia. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 8(3), 101–108.
     Google Scholar
  9. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Developing a theory of formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Eds.), Assessment and learning (pp. 81–100). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.
     Google Scholar
  10. Boix Mansilla, V., & Duraising, E. (2007). Targeted assessment of students’ interdisciplinary work: an empirically grounded framework proposal. Journal of Higher Education, 78(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2007.11780874.
     Google Scholar
  11. Bovermann, K., Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. (2018). Online learning readiness and attitudes towards gaming in gamified online learning – a mixed methods case study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 27, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0107-0.
     Google Scholar
  12. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
     Google Scholar
  13. Chappuis, S., Commodore, C., & Stiggins, R. J. (2010). Assessment balance and quality: An action guide for school leaders. Assessment Training Institute.
     Google Scholar
  14. Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approach. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
     Google Scholar
  15. Cross, R. (2010). Language teaching as sociocultural activity: Rethinking language teacher practice. The Modern Language Journal, 94(3), 434–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01058.x.
     Google Scholar
  16. DeLuca, C., LaPointe-McEwan, D., & Luhanga, U. (2016). Approaches to classroom assessment inventory: A new instrument to support teacher assessment literacy. Educational Assessment, 21(4), 248–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2016.1236677.
     Google Scholar
  17. Department of Education [DepEd]. (2020). Learning opportunities shall be available: the basic education learning continuity plan in the time of COVID-19. https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/DepEd_LCP_July3.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  18. De Villa, J. A., & Manalo, F. K. B. (2020). Secondary teachers’ preparation, challenges, and coping mechanism in the pre-implementation of distance learning in the new normal. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(3), 144–154.
     Google Scholar
  19. Fisher, M. E., Dorner, M. A., Maghzi, K. S., Achieng-Evensen, C., Whitaker, L. C., Hansell, F., ... & Gapinski, S. M. (2021). Liminality, disruption, and change: A prismatic look at pandemic education. Prospects, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-021-09563-9.
     Google Scholar
  20. Gebril, A., & Brown, G. T. L. (2014). The effect of high-stakes examination systems on teacher beliefs: Egyptian teachers’ conceptions of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(1), 16–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2013.831030.
     Google Scholar
  21. Genç, T., & Evran Acar, F. (2021). Perspectives related to socio-scientific issues according to the scientific attitude points of secondary school students. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 8(2), 197–213.
     Google Scholar
  22. Giamellaro, M. (2014). Primary contextualization of science learning through immersion in content-rich settings. International Journal of Science Education, 36(17), 2848–2871. https://doi.or/10.1080/09500693.2014.937787.
     Google Scholar
  23. Gipps, C. (2002). Sociocultural perspectives on assessment. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century, 73–83. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753545.
     Google Scholar
  24. González-García, M., Álvarez, J. C., Pérez, E. Z., Fernandez-Carriba, S., & López, J. G. (2021). Feasibility of a brief online mindfulness and compassion-based intervention to promote mental health among university students during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Mindfulness, 12(7), 1685–1695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-021-01632-6.
     Google Scholar
  25. Global Education Monitoring Report (2020). Could coronavirus shape the way assessments work forever? [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://gemreportunesco.wordpress.com/2020/03/20/could-coronavirus-shape-the- way-assessments-work-forever/.
     Google Scholar
  26. Glonti, K., & Hren, D. (2018). Editors’ perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study. BMJ open, 8(10), e020568. http://dx.doi. org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017- 020568.
     Google Scholar
  27. Gonzales, R. D. (2023). From face-to-face to virtual student assessment: changes in student assessment practices during COVID-19 among Filipino teachers. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(1), 159–164.
     Google Scholar
  28. Gudiño Paredes, S., Jasso Peña, F. D. J., & de La Fuente Alcazar, J. M. (2021). Remote proctored exams: Integrity assurance in online education? .Distance Education, 42(2), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2021.1910495.
     Google Scholar
  29. Hailikari, T., Virtanen, V., Vesalainen, M., & Postareff, L. (2021). Student perspectives on how different elements of constructive alignment support active learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 1469787421989160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787421989160.
     Google Scholar
  30. Halawa, A., Sharma, A., Bridson, J., Lyon, S., Prescott, D., Guha, A., & Taylor, D. (2017). Constructing quality feedback to the students in distance learning: Review of the current evidence with reference to the online master’s degree in transplantation. World Journal of Education, 7(4), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v7n4p117.
     Google Scholar
  31. Harton, H. C., Aladia, S., & Gordon, A. (2019). Faculty and student perceptions of cheating in online vs. traditional classes. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 22 (4). https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter224/hartonaladiagordon224.html.
     Google Scholar
  32. Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough? Qualitative health research, 27(4), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344.
     Google Scholar
  33. Herwin, H., Hastomo, A., Saptono , B., Ardiansyah , A. R., & Wibowo, S. E. (2021). How elementary school teachers organized online learning during the Covid-19 Pandemic? World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 13(3), 437–449. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v13i3.5952.
     Google Scholar
  34. Hollweck, T., & Doucet, A. (2020). Pracademics in the pandemic: pedagogies and professionalism. Journal of Professional Capital and Community. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-06-2020-0038.
     Google Scholar
  35. Honigsfeld, A., & Nordmeyer, J. (2020). Teacher collaboration during a global pandemic. Educational Leadership, 77(10), 47–50.
     Google Scholar
  36. Huang, J. (2020). Successes and challenges: Online teaching and learning of chemistry in higher education in China in the time of COVID-19. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 2810–2814. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00671.
     Google Scholar
  37. Jankowski, N. A. (2020). Assessment during a crisis: responding to a global pandemic. National institute for learning outcomes assessment.
     Google Scholar
  38. Jogezai, N. A., Baloch, F. A., Jaffar, M., Shah, T., Khilji, G. K., & Bashir, S. (2021). Teachers’ attitudes towards social media (SM) use in online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: the effects of SM use by teachers and religious scholars during physical distancing. Heliyon, 7(4), e06781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06781.
     Google Scholar
  39. Kelting-Gibson, L., Gallavan, N. P., St. Arnauld, E., Black, G., Cayson, A., ... & Wolfgang, J. I. (2014). Four facets of classroom assessments: obstacles, obligations, outcomes, and opportunities. Action in Teacher Education, 36(5–6), 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2014.977688.
     Google Scholar
  40. Lansangan, R. V. (2020). Teaching junior high school chemistry during the COVID-19 community quarantine season: Lessons, challenges, and opportunities. Kimika, 31(1), 20–37.
     Google Scholar
  41. Lansangan, R. V. (2022). Articulating the Barriers in the Online Learning Engagement in Chemistry of Junior High School Students: A Photovoice Study. Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 26(2), 56–76.
     Google Scholar
  42. Lansangan, R., Yoma, K., Yoma, C. A., Sibug, K. P., Cabrera, R. M., Gregorio, E., & Manubay, F. R. (2021). CHEMISTORY: Integration of Creative Story Writing in Understanding Chemical Elements in Online Learning. KIMIKA, 32(1), 110–128.
     Google Scholar
  43. Lansangan, R. V., & Gonzales, K. P. J. (2020). Science teachers’ voices in the new normal teaching: A phenomenological study. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(3), 124–132.
     Google Scholar
  44. Lederman, D. (2020, July 22). Best way to stop cheating in online courses? ‘Teach better’. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://www.insidehighered.com/digital- learning/article/2020/07/22/technology-best-way-stop-online-cheating-no-experts- say-better.
     Google Scholar
  45. Lehman, R. M., Mills, M. D., Gupta, R., & Calderon, O. (2021). Pedagogical intersections: ePortfolio practice and essential learning outcomes for 21st century success. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2021(166), 59–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.20452.
     Google Scholar
  46. Loughlin, C., Lygo-Baker, S., & Lindberg-Sand, Å. (2021). Reclaiming constructive alignment. European Journal of Higher Education, 11(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2020.1816197.
     Google Scholar
  47. Mahat-Shamir, M., Neimeyer, R. A., & Pitcho-Prelorentzos, S. (2021). Designing in-depth semi-structured interviews for revealing meaning reconstruction after loss. Death Studies, 45(2), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2019.1617388.
     Google Scholar
  48. Meccawy, Z., Meccawy, M., & Alsobhi, A. (2021). Assessment in ‘survival mode’: student and faculty perceptions of online assessment practices in HE during Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17, 1–24.
     Google Scholar
  49. Misra, F., & Mazelfi, I. (2021, February). Long-Distance Online Learning during Pandemic: The Role of Communication, Working in Group, and Self-Directed Learning in Developing Student’s Confidence. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance (ICED-QA 2020). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research.
     Google Scholar
  50. Mukhtar, K., Javed, K., Arooj, M., & Sethi, A. (2020). Advantages, limitations, and recommendations for online learning during covid-19 pandemic era. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36(COVID19-S4), S27–S31. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.
     Google Scholar
  51. Özkan Yıldız, F., & Yılmaz, A. (2021). Parent-teacher communication and parental expectations in the assessment process in Turkish preschool settings. Education, 49(6), 761–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2020.1861049.
     Google Scholar
  52. Powell, K. C., & Kalina, C. J. (2009). Cognitive and social constructivism: Developing tools for an effective classroom. Education, 130(2), 241–250. https://docdrop.org/static/drop-pdf/ConstructivismDay1-ln36v.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  53. Rahman, M. A., Novitasari, D., Handrianto, C., & Rasool, S. (2022). Challenges in online learning assessment during the covid-19 pandemic. Kolokium Jurnal Pendidikan Luar Sekolah, 10(1), 15–25.
     Google Scholar
  54. Rajab, M., Gazal, A., & Alkattan, K. (2020). Challenges to online medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cureus, 12(7), e8966. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8966.
     Google Scholar
  55. Rusak, G., & Yan, L. (2021). Unique Exams: Designing assessments for integrity and fairness. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (pp. 1170–1176). https://doi.org/10.1145/3408877.3432556.
     Google Scholar
  56. Safaah, E. S., Muslim, M., & Liliawati, W. (2017, September). Teaching science process skills by using the 5-stage learning cycle in junior high school. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1), p. 012106. IOP Publishing.
     Google Scholar
  57. Sanchez-Santillán, M., M. Paule-Ruiz, R. Cerezo, and V. Álvarez Garcia. (2016). MeL: A Dynamic Adaptive Model of the Learning Process in ELearning. Anales De Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 32 (1): 106–114.
     Google Scholar
  58. Santos, J., De Jesus, L. F., Sealmoy , R. R., & Fajardo, R. R. C. . (2020). Online distance learning amidst COVID-19. IJERI: International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 15, 291–304. https://doi.org/10.46661/ijeri.5271.
     Google Scholar
  59. Seema, S., Bibi, W., & Faizi, W. U. N. (2021). Implementation of assessment for learning and the need for teachers refreshing trainings. Ilkogretim Online, 20(3). https://doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2021.03.23
     Google Scholar
  60. Sufyan, A., Hidayat, D. N., Lubis, A., Kultsum, U., Defianty, M., & Suralaga, F. (2020, October). Implementation of E-learning during a pandemic: Potentials and challenges. In 2020 8th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM), (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
     Google Scholar
  61. Sunasee, R. (2020). Challenges of teaching organic chemistry during COVID-19 pandemic at a primarily undergraduate institution. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3176–3181. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00542.
     Google Scholar
  62. Suryawati, E., & Osman, K. (2018). Contextual learning: innovative approach towards the development of students’ scientific attitude and natural science performance. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/79329.
     Google Scholar
  63. Tannenbaum, R. J. (2019). Validity aspects of score reporting. In D. Zapata-Rivera (Ed.), Score reporting research and applications, 9–18. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  64. Tigaa, R. A., & Sonawane, S. L. (2020). An international perspective: teaching chemistry and engaging students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3318–3321. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00554.
     Google Scholar
  65. Tomlinson, C.A. (2005). An educator’s guide to differentiating instruction. Houghton Mifflin: Boston, MA.
     Google Scholar
  66. Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British educational research journal, 27(5), 615–631. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120095780.
     Google Scholar
  67. Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149-162
     Google Scholar
  68. Warnock, S. (2013, April). Frequent, low stakes grading: Assessment for communication, confidence. Faculty Focus
     Google Scholar
  69. Wibowo, D. E., Mahmudi, A., & Retnawati, H. (2021). The cooperation between teachers and parents to develop learning ability for primary school students at home during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 5(2).
     Google Scholar
  70. Wesley, T. N. (2017). Differentiation challenges in inner city school. Handbook of research on classroom diversity and inclusive education practice. Information Science Reference, 201–220. Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design. https://linkgalecom.trmproxy.mnpals.net/apps/doc/CX7285800023/GVRL?u=mn alll&sid=GVRL&xid=5d3e1f5d.
     Google Scholar
  71. Willis, J., Adie, L., & Klenowski, V. (2013). Conceptualizing teachers’ assessment literacies in an era of curriculum and assessment reform. The Australian Educational Researcher, 40(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013- 0089-9.
     Google Scholar


Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.