An Extraordinary Duet: Integration of PjBL and STEM to Promote Student’s Motivation, Scientific Literacy Skills, and Students Learning Outcomes

An Extraordinary Duet: Integration of PjBL and STEM to Promote Student’s Motivation, Scientific Literacy Skills, and Students Learning Outcomes



Abstract Views
31

Downloads
14

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This study aimed to investigate the effect of the STEM-integrated PjBL learning model on students’ motivation, scientific literacy skills, and learning achievement. The study used a non-equivalent control group design with a population of eleventh-grade high school Islam Athirah II Makassar students. Science Class 1 and Science Class 2 were included in the sample. The research instruments consisted of a learning motivation questionnaire, a Test of Scientific Literacy Skill (TOSLS), and an achievement test consisting of 20 multiple-choice questions. The Independent Sample t-test was used to assess the research data. The results indicated that the STEM-integrated PjBL learning model had a significant effect on students’ learning motivation, scientific literacy skills, and learning outcomes, with a significance value of 0.00 (<0.05). According to these findings, the STEM-integrated PjBL learning model can be utilized to increase students’ motivation, scientific literacy skills, and learning outcomes.
Keywords: Integrated PjBL Learning Outcomes Motivation Scientific Literacy Skills STEM
  1. Afriana, J, Permanasari, A., & Fitriani, A. (2016). Project-based learning integrated to stem to enhance elementary school students’ scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 5 (2), 261–262. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i2.8561.  |   Google Scholar
  2. Azwar, S. (2012). Reabilitas dan Validitas. Yogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.  |   Google Scholar
  3. Baran, M., & Maskan, A. (2010). The effect of project-based learning on pre-service physics teachers’ electrostatic achievements. Cypriot J. Educ. Sci, 5, 243–257.  |   Google Scholar
  4. Bicer, A., Peter, B., Robert, M. C., Mary, M. C. (2015). The Effects of STEM PBL on Students’ Mathematical and Scientific Vocabulary Knowledge. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 2 (2).  |   Google Scholar
  5. Capraro, R.M., Capraro, M.M., & Morgan, J.R. (2013). STEM project-based learning is an integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics stem approach. Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.  |   Google Scholar
  6. Colley, K. (2008). Project-based science instruction: a primer--an introduction and learning cycle for implementing project-based science. National Science Teacher Association, Arlington: USA.  |   Google Scholar
  7. Fatmawati, I. N. (2016). Penerapan levels of inquiry untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa smp tema limbah dan upaya penanggulangannya [Application of levels of inquiry to improve science literacy for middle school students with the theme of waste and efforts to overcome it]. Education Science, 7, 151–159. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v7i2.1750.  |   Google Scholar
  8. Furi, L. M. I., Handayani, S., & Maharani, S. (2018). Eksperimen model pembelajaran project-based learning dan project-based learning terintegrasi stem untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar dan kreativitas siswa pada kompetensi dasar teknologi pengolahan susu [Experiments of project-based learning and project-based learning integrated stem learning models to improve student learning outcomes and creativity in basic competencies of milk processing technology]. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 35(1), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpp.v35i1.13886.  |   Google Scholar
  9. Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012). Developing a test of scientific literacy skills (TOSLS): measuring undergraduates’ evaluation of scientific information and arguments. LSE, 11, 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026.  |   Google Scholar
  10. Hake, R. R. (2007). Design-Based Research in Physics Education Research. NSF Grant DUE.  |   Google Scholar
  11. Insyasiska, D., Zubaidah, S., & Susilo, H. (2017). Pengaruh project-based learning terhadap motivasi belajar, kreativitas, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kemampuan kognitif siswa pada pembelajaran biologi [The effect of project based learning on learning motivation, creativity, critical thinking ability, and students' cognitive ability in biology learning]. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi. Universitas Negeri Malang. 7 (1). http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um052v7i1p9-21.  |   Google Scholar
  12. Ismayani, A. (2016). Pengaruh penerapan stem project-based learning terhadap kreativitas matematis siswa SMK [The effect of stem project-based learning on the mathematical creativity of vocational high school students]. Indonesian Digital Journal of Mathematics and Education, 3 (4).  |   Google Scholar
  13. Kamdi, W. (2007). Pembelajaran berbasis proyek: model potensial untuk peningkatan mutu pembelajaran. (Online) [Project-based learning: a potential model for improving the quality of learning] http://waraskhamdi.com/pembelajaran-berbasis-proyek/html).  |   Google Scholar
  14. Kemendiknas. (2011). Instrument penilaian hasil belajar matematika smp: belajar dari pisa dan TIMMS [Assessment instruments for middle school mathematics learning outcomes: learning from pisa and TIMMS] Jakarta: Kemendiknas.  |   Google Scholar
  15. Kemendikbud. (2019). Ringkasan eksekutif hasil ujian nasional 2019 sma/ma dan smk masukan untuk pembelajaran di sekolah. Badan penelitian dan pengembangan kementerian pendidikan dan kebudayaan. [Executive Summary of 2019 National Examination Results for SMA/MA and Vocational Schools Input for Learning in Schools. Research and Development Agency of the Ministry of Education and Culture].  |   Google Scholar
  16. Laboy-Rush, D. (2010). Integrated STEM Education Through Project-Based Learning. www.learning.com/stem/whitepaper/integrated-stem-through-project-based-learning.  |   Google Scholar
  17. Lin, H., Hong, Z. R., & Huang, T.C. (2012). The role of emotional factors in building public scientific literacy and engagement with science. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.551430.  |   Google Scholar
  18. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2016). Science literacy: concepts, contexts, and consequences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/23595.  |   Google Scholar
  19. Nurtanto, M., Sudira, P, Kholifah, N, Samsudin, A., & Warju. (2020). Vocational Teachers’ Perceptions and Perspectives in the Implementation of STEM Learning in the 21st Century. TEM Journal. 9(4), 1675–1680, ISSN 2217‐8309, DOI: 10.18421/TEM94‐46.  |   Google Scholar
  20. OECD. 2015. PISA (2015) assessment and analytical framework. science, reading, mathematics, financial literacy and collaborative problem-solving. OECD Publishing.  |   Google Scholar
  21. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing.  |   Google Scholar
  22. Sani. (2015). Pembelajaran Saintifik Untuk Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 [Scientific Learning for the Implementation of Curriculum 2013]. Bumi Aksara Jakarta.  |   Google Scholar
  23. Tati, T., Firman, H., & Riandi, R. (2017). The effect of stem learning through the project of designing boat model toward student stem literacy. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (Icmsce). Journal of Physics.  |   Google Scholar
  24. Thomas, J. W., Mergendoller, J. R., & Michaelson, A. (1999). Project-based learning: a handbook for middle and high school teachers. Novato, CA: The Buck Institute for Education.  |   Google Scholar
  25. Thomas, J. W. (2002). A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning. Retrieved from http://www.newtechnetwork.org.590elmp01.blackmesh.com/sites/default/files/dr/pblresearch2.pdf.  |   Google Scholar
  26. Tinker, R. F. (1992). Thinking about science. [Unpublished manuscript, Technical Educational Research Center, Cambridge, MA].  |   Google Scholar
  27. Topalska, R. (2021). Steam education in the view of the Bulgarian teacher. TEM Journal, 10(4), 1822–1827, ISSN 2217-8309, DOI: 10.18421/TEM104-45.  |   Google Scholar
  28. Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A.M., & Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st-century skills through scientific literacy and science process skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253.  |   Google Scholar
  29. Wandi, A., Hendri, W., & Gusmawati. (2014). Pengaruh motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar biologi siswa kelas xi sma kartika 1–5 padang [The influence of learning motivation on biology learning outcomes of class xi sma kartika 1-5 padang]. JFKIP Journal. 1(4), 6.  |   Google Scholar
  30. Wijayanti, A., & Fajriyah, K. (2018). Implementation of STEM project-based learning to increase scientific work skills of prospective students of primary school teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains (JPS), 6, 62–69. https://doi.org/10.26714/jps.6.2.2018.62-69.  |   Google Scholar

How to Cite

Nurhayati B, Jamaluddin, F. J., Daud, F., Saenab, S., Hadis, A., Hadis, N. I. R., & Remiza. (2023). An Extraordinary Duet: Integration of PjBL and STEM to Promote Student’s Motivation, Scientific Literacy Skills, and Students Learning Outcomes. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 4(3), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2023.4.3.639

Search Panel

 Nurhayati B
 Google Scholar |   EJEDU Journal
 Fathul J. Jamaluddin
 Google Scholar |   EJEDU Journal
 Firdaus Daud
 Google Scholar |   EJEDU Journal
 Sitti Saenab
 Google Scholar |   EJEDU Journal
 Abdul Hadis
 Google Scholar |   EJEDU Journal
 Nurul I. Romadhana Hadis
 Google Scholar |   EJEDU Journal
 Remiza
 Google Scholar |   EJEDU Journal