##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Many factors, including workload, student-related issues, research and job development, interpersonal relationships, and administrative-related issues, have been linked to workplace stress, with higher academic institutions (HEIs) seeing the most of it. While several studies have looked into various aspects of work stress in HEIs, very few studies have investigated how psychosocial factors mediate the effect of the physical environment to work stress. Thus, this study is conducted to empirically test how psychosocial working conditions significantly mediate the influence of Physical work Environment on workplace stress in Higher Education Institutions in the Philippines. Involving 265 teaching faculty in selected HEIs in Southern Philippines, the study utilized structural equation modeling to analyze the interest constructs. The results showed that Physical Work Environment significantly influences Psychosocial Work Environment while Psychosocial Work Environment significantly influences work stress). In contrast, the path from Physical Work Environment to work stress was not statistically significant. Thus, Psychosocial Work Environment fully mediates the influence of the Physical Work Environment on an individual’s work stress level. Put differently, physical work environment could only result in work stress if Psychosocial Work Environment mediates it.

References

  1. Al Sabei, S. D., Labrague, L. J., Miner Ross, A., Karkada, S., Albashayreh, A., Al Masroori, F., & Al Hashmi, N. (2020). Nursing work environment, turnover intention, job burnout, and quality of care: The moderating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 52(1), 95–104.
     Google Scholar
  2. Allebeck P, Mastekaasa A (2010). Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Chapter 5. Risk factors for sick leave-general studies. Scandinavian journal of public health Supplement, 63,49–108.
     Google Scholar
  3. Amir, F. (2010). Measuring the impact of office environment on performance level of employees. Global Environment. Bhurban, Pakistan appraisal. Glenview: Scott, Foresman and Company.
     Google Scholar
  4. Andersen LL, Clausen T, Persson R, Holtermann A. (2012). Dose-response relation between perceived physical exertion during healthcare work and risk of long-term sickness absence. Scand J Work Environ Health, 38(6), 582–9.
     Google Scholar
  5. Bambra C, Egan M, Thomas S, Petticrew M, Whitehead M. (2013). The psychosocial and health effects of workplace reorganization. 2. A systematic review of task restructuring interventions. Journal of epidemiology and community health, 61(12),1028–37.
     Google Scholar
  6. Besser, A., Lotem, S., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2022). Psychological stress and vocal symptoms among university professors in Israel: implications of the shift to online synchronous teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of voice, 36(2), 291–e9.
     Google Scholar
  7. Brenner, P. (2010). Workers physical surrounding. Impact bottom line accounting: Smarts Pros.com.
     Google Scholar
  8. Chandrasekar K. (2011). Workplace environment and its impact on organizational performance in public sector organizations. International Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business Systems, 1(1), 1–19.
     Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, C., and Dewe, P. (2010). Stress, a brief history. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
     Google Scholar
  10. Cox, T., Griffiths, A., Rial-Gonzales. E. (2006). Research on work-related Stress. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg.
     Google Scholar
  11. Dembe A, Delbos R, Erickson JB, Banks S. (2013). Associations between employees’ work schedules and the vocational consequences of workplace injuries. Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 17, 641–651.
     Google Scholar
  12. Goh, J., Pfeffer, J., & Zenios, S. A. (2019). Reducing the health toll from US workplace stress. Behavioral Science & Policy, 5(1), iv–13.
     Google Scholar
  13. Hogg, M. (2006) Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: a motivational theory of social identity processes. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol, 11,223–55.
     Google Scholar
  14. Kakada, P. and Deshpande, Y. (2018). The empirical study of work environment and job stress among technical faculty. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), e-ISSN, 2278-487X, p-ISSN: 2319–7668. 20(1), 29–33.
     Google Scholar
  15. Khan, A., Teoh, K. R., Islam, S., & Hassard, J. (2018). Psychosocial work characteristics, burnout, psychological morbidity symptoms and early retirement intentions: a cross-sectional study of NHS consultants in the UK. BMJ open, 8(7), e018720.
     Google Scholar
  16. Kinderman P, Schwannauer M, Pontin E, Tai S. (2013). Psychological processes mediate the impact of familial risk, social circumstances and life events on mental health. PloS one, 8(10),e76564.
     Google Scholar
  17. Kohun, S. (1992). Business environment. Ibadan: University Press.
     Google Scholar
  18. Kompier M. (2011). Dealing with workplace stress. In: Cooper C, editor. Handbook of stress medicine and health. Lancester (UK): CRC Pres.pp. 349–74.
     Google Scholar
  19. Kristof-Brown, L. (1997). Goal congruence in project teams: Does the fit between members’ personal mastery and performance goals matter? J. Appl. Psychol, 86,1083–95
     Google Scholar
  20. Le Fevre, M, Kolt, G., and Matheny, J (2011) Eustress, distress and their interpretation in primary and secondary occupational stress management interventions which way first? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(6) 547–565.
     Google Scholar
  21. Leka S, Jain A. (2010). Health impact of psychosocial hazards at work: institute of work, health & organizations. University of Nottingham.
     Google Scholar
  22. Li, N., Zhang, L., Li, X., & Lu, Q. (2022). Moderated role of social support in the relationship between job strain, burnout, and organizational commitment among operating room nurses: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 10813.
     Google Scholar
  23. Maslach C, and Leite, M (2011). Reversing Burn Out: How to rekindle your passion for your work. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 3(4): 42–43.
     Google Scholar
  24. McGowan, J, Gardner, D., and Fletcher, R (2012). Positive and negative affective outcomes of occupational stress. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 35(2) 92.
     Google Scholar
  25. McLinton, S. S., Dollard, M. F., & Tuckey, M. R. (2018). New perspectives on psychosocial safety climate in healthcare: A mixed methods approach. Safety Science, 109, 236–245.
     Google Scholar
  26. Netterstrom B, Conrad N, Bech P, Fink P, Olsen O, Rugulies R (2014). The relation between work-related psychosocial factors and the development of depression. Epidemiol Rev, 30:118–32.
     Google Scholar
  27. Nijman, D. J. J. (2010). Differential effects of supervisor support on transfer of training. Enchede: University of Twente
     Google Scholar
  28. O’Boyle, E. H., Jr., & Williams, L. J. (2011). Decomposing model fit: Measurement vs. theory in organizational research using latent variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 1–12.
     Google Scholar
  29. Omar A, (2012). Justicia Organizational, Individualismo-Colectivismo y Estrés Laboral [Organizational justice, individualism-collectivism and work stress]. Psicología y Salud,16(2), 207–217.
     Google Scholar
  30. Opperman C. (2008). Tropical business issues. Partner price water house coopers. International Business Review.
     Google Scholar
  31. Sonnentag, S., and Frese, M. (2008). Stress in Organizations. In W.C. Borman, D.R. Ilgen & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
     Google Scholar
  32. Syed, S. and Farah, A. (2015). Sources of stress and the coping mechanism for Malaysian entrepreneurs. Journal of Asia Entrepreneurship and Sustainability,5(3), 52.
     Google Scholar
  33. Taheri, R. H., Miah, M. S., & Kamaruzzaman, M. (2020). Impact of working environment on job satisfaction. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 5(6), 1–5.
     Google Scholar
  34. Taouk, Y., Spittal, M. J., LaMontagne, A. D., & Milner, A. J. (2020). Psychosocial work stressors and risk of all-cause and coronary heart disease mortality. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 46(1), 19–31.
     Google Scholar
  35. Teo, S. T., Bentley, T., & Nguyen, D. (2020). Psychosocial work environment, work engagement, and employee commitment: A moderated, mediation model. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 88, 102415.
     Google Scholar
  36. Townley, G. (2006). Long hours culture causing the economy to suffer. Management Accounting,78 (6), 3–5.
     Google Scholar
  37. Umberson D, Montez J (2010). Social relationships and health: a flashpoint for health policy. Journal of health and social behavior, 51, S54–66.
     Google Scholar
  38. Virtanen, M., Jokela, M., Madsen, I. E., Hanson, L. L. M., Lallukka, T., Nyberg, S. T., ... & Kivimäki, M. (2018). Long working hours and depressive symptoms: systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies and unpublished individual participant data. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 44(3), 239–250.
     Google Scholar
  39. Walton, A. G. (2013). Is a little stress a Isod thing for the brain. Forbes. New York. 2013 Retrieved on 12/12/18.
     Google Scholar
  40. Wei, H., Sewell, K. A., Woody, G., & Rose, M. A. (2018). The state of the science of nurse work environments in the United States: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 5(3), 287–300.
     Google Scholar
  41. Wui, W., West, S. B., & Taylor, A. B. (2009). Evaluating model fit for growth curve models: Integration of fit indices from SEM and MLM frameworks. Psychological Methods, 14,183–201.
     Google Scholar
  42. Yu, K. (2013) A motivational model of person-environment fit: psychological motives as drivers of change. In Organizational Fit: Key Issues and New Directions, ed. AL Kristof-Brown, J Billsberry, pp. 19–49. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
     Google Scholar