• Ucu Rahayu 
  • Rif’at Shafwatul Anam 
  • Mestika Sekarwinahyu 
  • Amalia Sapriati 
  • Yos Sudarso 
  • Inas Sausan 

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Inquiry skills are needed by a teacher to create effective learning experiences so that the overall quality of education can improve. This becomes even more important for distance education students, whose characteristics include being independent and active learners. This research aims to determine the level of inquiry abilities of students in the biology education, physics education, and elementary school teacher education programs at the Open University. The subjects of this research were 96 students from various regions. The survey method was implemented by providing an instrument in the form of questions to measure inquiry skills, which were distributed via Google Forms. The research results show that students’ inquiry skills vary. Students in the Biology Education and Physics Education study programs are at an intermediate level, but students in the Elementary School Teacher Education study program are at a low level of inquiry skills. Inquiry skills for each dimension also vary. Based on these results, efforts are needed to improve the inquiry skills of distance education students in the form of training or other habits so that they can implement them.

Introduction

Science is knowledge gained from a systematic set of activities used to understand natural phenomena. Science has an important role in human life. Science is essentially built on the basis of scientific processes, scientific products, scientific attitudes, and applications (Kurniawanet al., 2019). Over the past few decades, science learning has been synonymous with inquiry (Cairns & Areepattamannil, 2019; Fitzgeraldet al., 2019; Liuet al., 2020). Inquiry-based learning is a method that should empower the skills that students need to master (Ghaemi & Mirsaeed, 2017). Learning of science will be optimal if 1) teachers understand inquiry (St. Pierre, 2019); 2) students practice their skills (Marshallet al., 2017); and 3) students understand their progress in achieving these skills (Cairns & Areepattamannil, 2019; Cartwright & Hallar, 2018). Research conducted by previous researchers has shown that inquiry-based learning can increase creativity and contribute positively to student learning outcomes (Rodríguezet al., 2019).

Skills supporting the inquiry process are called inquiry skills (Pedasteet al., 2015). Many experts express inquiry skills as skills built into the process of science (Dileket al., 2020; Dobberet al., 2017; Ekici & Erdem, 2020). Inquiry skills include observing and hypothesizing, designing experimental procedures, experimenting, interpreting data, concluding, and communicating. Another expert explains inquiry skills as basic skills such as observing, inference, and classification based on data predicting based on relationship patterns; intermediate skills, such as explaining models based on concepts, recording measurement results, using mathematical model formulations, describing relationships between variables, using evidence and logic, designing investigations, making measurements accurately, using technology during investigations related higher skills: synthesizing hypotheses, analyzing arguments, revising hypotheses, and solving problems (Darling-Hammondet al., 2020). Some experts define Taxonomy inquiry skills in experiments and then adapted by Ješkováet al. (2018), which can be revealed in Table I.

Indicators of inquiry skills Sub-indicators of inquiry
Conception and planning design Defining problems Formulating hypothesis Designing variables and the relationship between variables and the experimental process
Implementation Predicting experimental results Determining which tools to use Determining what is measured, observed, and recorded
Analysis and interpretation Change the data representation in the form of graphs/diagrams and tables Making generalizations from experimental results Making conclusions
Communicating Outlining a formal report on the results obtained
Table I. Taxonomy of Inquiry

Every teacher needs these inquiry skills to create an effective learning experience. The low inquiry skills of prospective teachers can have a domino effect on students in their classes. They are ill-prepared to face the integration of various fields with the field of education (van Allen & Zygouris-Coe, 2019). Based on this, it is important to ensure that prospective teachers or even senior teachers have adequate inquiry skills. Many studies analyze these skills but tend to focus on student subjects (Elisantiet al., 2020; Kireš & Jurková, 2021), so research is needed that focuses on prospective or senior teachers.

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, known as FKIP (in Indonesia) of Universitas Terbuka (UT; Open University), students are students who have a teaching background or experience at either the elementary, middle, or high school level. They really need inquiry skills to upgrade the quality of their learning. Like the vision and mission promoted by FKIP UT, namely, to provide opportunities for teachers to improve their qualifications and competencies without leaving their teaching schools or duties, research that aims to determine the level of students’ abilities is really needed.

FKIP UT has 11 study programs, including elementary school teacher education, physics education, biology education, mathematics education, chemistry education, early childhood teacher education, Indonesian language education, English education, economics education, civics education, and educational technology. This paper will focus on the three study programs, namely elementary school teacher education, physics education, and biology education, which will analyze the level of inquiry ability so that it can be used as a consideration for future policies.

Research Method

Research Design

A quantitative approach was used in this research, where the method chosen was a purpose-designed survey method (Braunet al., 2021). This method is used to determine the level of student inquiry skills. The steps in this survey start with problem analysis, developing inquiry skills instruments, conducting research on Open University’s teacher students, data analysis, and making reports.

Participants

The participants in this research were Open University’s teacher students from the biology education, physics education, and elementary school teacher education study programs, all of whom have become teachers, who are spread out from various cities in Indonesia. The selection of research subjects used random sampling where there were no specific criteria. A total of 96 students were willing to fill out the survey with the characteristics shown in Table II.

Variable N Percentage
Gender Male 26 27.08
Female 70 72.92
Residence Bandung 17 17.7
Jakarta 35 36.45
Purwokerto 4 4.17
Palembang 2 2.08
Medan 8 8.33
Bandar lampung 2 2.08
Jember 2 2.08
Semarang 2 2.08
Surabaya 2 2.08
Yogyakarta 1 1.04
Jayapura 1 1.04
Malang 2 2.08
Denpasar 1 1.04
Pontianak 7 7.29
Samarinda 2 2.08
Surakarta 1 1.04
Bogor 2 2.08
Jambi 1 1.04
Bengkulu 1 1.04
Pekanbaru 1 1.04
Mataram 1 1.04
Semarang 2 2.08
Manado 1 1.04
Term 1–4 10 10.4
5–8 34 35.4
>8 52 54.2
Table II. Participant Characteristics

Instruments

The instrument used in this research was a Google Form questionnaire containing 30 multiple-choice questions. Two experts with doctoral degrees in science education have validated the instrument used in this research. Based on the results of expert validation through Kendall’s Tau calculations, it has a value of 0.853 or is included in the “very high” category, while for the reliability of this instrument based on Cronbach’s Alpha calculations, a value of 0.739 is obtained or is included in the “high” category. This question refers to indicators of inquiry skills, namely: 1) conceptualizing and planning design; 2) implementation; 3) analyzing and interpreting; and 4) communication skills. Several examples of questions used to measure student inquiry skills are shown in Table III.

Components of inquiry skills Questions
Conceptualizing and planning design A child conducts an experiment with three springs hanging in the same position, and all three are given the same load of 250 grams, as shown in the picture below. What do you think is the correct problem formulation for the practical activities carried out by the child?
Implementation Alea plants bean seeds in clay, sand, and humus soil in pots of the same size. All plants received the same amount of sunlight and water for ten days. The growth of the bean seedlings in each pot was continuously observed and recorded by Alea. What factors do you think make the difference between the three pots?
Analyzing and interpreting Ari conducted an experiment on a series of electric circuits to find out what the voltage and electric current were at each point. The voltage used in this experiment was 9 volts with three identical lights. Based on the results of this experiment, the following data was obtained: Based on this data, what conclusions can you draw?
Communication skills Rif’at is writing an article based on the results of his research. What components should be written sequentially in the article?
Table III. Instruments of Inquiry Skills

Data Analysis

In this study, quantitative data analysis was carried out by considering the number of correct scores and the length of time to answer the questions asked. Groups of students from the three study programs were analyzed for their level of inquiry skills through 30 multiple-choice questions derived from indicators of inquiry skills, which can be seen in Table II.

Result and Discussion

Inquiry skills can influence the development of the level of critical thinking because they can develop skills in interpreting, analyzing, turning, and concluding, all of which are the essence of critical thinking skills (Wale & Bishaw, 2020). This is another reason why a teacher must have and master this skill. Teachers who have inquiry skills are able to encourage students to become active researchers in their learning process. They can design assignments that encourage students to ask questions, seek answers, and develop a deep understanding of a particular topic. In addition, teachers with inquiry skills are able to create a learning environment that supports exploration, collaboration, and reflection so that students can develop critical skills and the ability to think independently and be independent in their learning. Teacher inquiry skills also play an important role in helping students understand the world around them, developing information literacy, and preparing them to face the complex challenges of the 21st century (Bores-Garcíaet al., 2020).

The inquiry skills of students from the three study programs showed mixed results. They show different tendencies. The data can be seen in Table IV. In general, the average score for inquiry skills of Biology Education students is the highest, at 65.55. It is categorized at the medium level. The average inquiry skill of Physics Education students is 62.78, which is at a medium level. However, the average inquiry skill of primary teacher education students is 41.83, in the low category. The time completed to work on this inquiry ability varies, where the Physics Education students had completed tasks of the instrument of inquiry skills for 31 minutes 50 seconds, continued by primary teacher students for 38 minutes 32 seconds, and continued by Biology Education students for 44 minutes 11 seconds. The average Biology teacher student does it in a longer time. This shows that there is caution from the teachers in doing the problem compared to physics teachers and elementary school teachers. Biology teachers are unfamiliar with material characterized by quantitative measurements and repeatable experiments to test hypotheses. They are familiar with experiments and observations in the laboratory and field, although there remains room for descriptive-based approaches (Hartanti, 2021). Elementary school teachers also require a longer time to solve this inquiry ability problem than physics teachers. This is because the question of inquiry ability is considered difficult for elementary school teachers. Elementary school teachers are responsible for teaching students in many subject areas. This makes them not focus too much on one subject, such as science, which is the object of the instrument questions (Akin-Sabuncu & Ok, 2021).

Subject PrTE BiTE PhTE
Sample size (n) 62 21 12
Male 19 3 4
Female 43 18 8
Average inquiry skills (x) 41.83 65.55 62.78
x min 16.67 30 40
x max 76.67 90 80
Average time completion 38 min 32 s 44 min 11 s 31 min 50 s
t min 1 min 7 min 16 min
t max 100 min 120 min 65 min
Table IV. Statistics of Data Sample

Inquiry skills include four (4) indicators, namely, 1) conception and planning design, 2) implementation, 3) analyzing and interpretation, and 4) communication skills. There are three (3) scores of indicators of inquiry skills of primary teacher education that are less than 50, namely skill of implementation, skill of analysis and interpretation, and skill of communication. In Biology Education students, the score for skill implementation is less than 50. However, all the scores of inquiry skills of physics education students are more than 50. These can be seen in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1. Inquiry skills levels by indicators.

The difference in the level of inquiry skills possessed by biology teachers, physics teachers, and elementary school teachers may be due to the habituation carried out by these teachers during teaching (Jannahet al., 2022; Setionoet al., 2021). Biology teachers and Physics teachers, as science teachers, teach only natural science in their daily duties of teachers. In recent decades, inquiry has been identified with science learning (Constantinouet al., 2018). This means that science teachers are accustomed to applying the inquiry approach in their learning process. On the other hand, elementary school teachers are class teachers who must also master social science, civics, and mathematics subject matters in addition to science subject matter. This means that inquiry identified with science subjects is most likely only applied when they are teaching science subjects.

If this inquiry skill is broken down into inquiry sub-skills, then there are four sub-skills of inquiry of Primary Teacher Education at a low level, namely the skills to predict experimental results, process and analyze data, change data representations in the form of graphs and tables, make conclusions, and make formal reports about the results obtained. In contrast, other sub-skills are in the medium category. In Biology Education students, there are two sub-skills of inquiry in the low category, namely the skills to process and analyze data and change data representations in the form of graphs and tables. The other six sub-skills are in the medium category. These are defining problems, formulating hypotheses, designing variables and relationships between variables and experimental processes, predicting experimental results, determining what is measured, observed, and recorded, and making formal reports. There are two sub-skills in the high category, namely, making generalizations from experimental results and making conclusions. In Physics teaching students, there is one sub-indicator in the low category, namely the skill of processing and analyzing data and changing data representations in the form of graphs and tables. There is one sub-skill of inquiry in the good category, that is, making conclusions, and eight other sub-skills of inquiry in the medium category.

Referring to Table V, the inquiry skills of primary teacher students, biology teacher students, and physics teacher students are varied. The inquiry skill of Biology teacher students is not significantly higher than that of Physics teacher students, but it is significantly higher than that of primary teacher students. Fifty percent of the inquiry skills possessed by primary teacher students are in the low category, and the other 50% of skills are in the medium category. In biology teacher students, 20% of inquiry skills are in the low category, 60% are sub-skills in the medium category, and 20% are other skills in the high category. Ten percent of inquiry sub-skills of Physics Education teacher students are in the low category, ten percent in the high category, and the other 80% in the medium category. There are several sub-indicators of inquiry ability that still need to be improved in elementary school teachers, biology teachers, and physics teachers, namely sub-indicators of inquiry ability in changing data representations in the form of graphs/diagrams and tables. It is relevant to the PISA result. Based on PISA assessments, the science ability of students at fourteen ages is also low, ranking 71 of 80 participant countries (Schleicher, 2018). The weaknesses in this skill should be solved. We should give more tasks to teacher students, particularly Biology, Physics, and Primary teacher students, that are relevant to the ability to change data representations in the form of graphs/diagrams and tables. The sub-skills in data processing and analyzing are in the low category for elementary teachers and biology teachers. Data processing and analysis need other skills, namely numeracy and statistics (Megawati & Sutarto, 2021). Based on observations, biology teachers and elementary school teachers do not really like counting/numeracy. Therefore, it is necessary to give more tasks and practice in processing and analyzing data. In Table V, we can see that 50% of primary teacher students still have low ability in the inquiry approach. Therefore, this encourages UT to practice inquiry skills with its students not only through practicum courses, but also other courses.

Skills Sub-skills PrTE BiTE PhTE
Concepting and planning design Defining problems 50.54 74.62 72.2
Formulating hypotheis 68.28 65.1 69.4
Designing variables and relationships between variables and the experimental process 53.22 60.33 58.3
Implementation Predicting experimental results 39.8 63.48 61
Determining tools is used 51.08 63.48 58.3
Determining what is measured, observed, and recorded 44.30 30.09 52.8
Analysis and interpretation Changing the data representation in the form of graphs/diagrams and tables 28.5 30.9 40
Making generalizations from experimental result 55.91 82.3 72.2
Making conclusions 47.31 87.14 80.56
Communication Outlining a formal report on the results obtained 38.71 69.86 61.1
Average 41.83 65.55 62.78
Table V. Inquiry Skills of Students of Primary, Biology, and Physics Teacher Education Program

Conclusion

The level of student inquiry skills in the three study programs, biology education, physics education, and primary school teacher education, tends to be at a low-medium level. This requires special attention from the relevant parties to overcome it. In conclusion, it seems that the cultivation and improvement of inquiry skills through distance education is still a challenge. Efforts are needed to improve inquiry skills for distance education students in the form of training or other habituation, particularly for primary teacher students, in almost all sub-indicators of inquiry skills. Some indicators of inquiry skills for Biology and Physics teacher students of Universitas Terbuka still need to be improved.

References

  1. Akin-Sabuncu, S., & Ok, A. (2021). Essential qualities for elementary teachers of the 21st century : Voices of key stakeholders. Ilkogretim Online - Elementary Education Online, 20(1), 532–552. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.045
     Google Scholar
  2. Bores-García, D., Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Fernandez-Rio, F. J., González-Calvo, G., Barba-Martín, R., Hortigüela-Alcalá, D., Fernandez-, F. J., Fernandez-Rio, F. J., & González-Calvo, G. (2020). Research quarterly for exercise and sport research on cooperative learning in physical education: Systematic review of the last five years. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 00(00), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2020.1719276
     Google Scholar
  3. Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2021). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550
     Google Scholar
  4. Cairns, D., & Areepattamannil, S. (2019). Exploring the relations of inquiry-based teaching to science achievement and dispositions in 54 countries. Research in Science Education, 49(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9639-x
     Google Scholar
  5. Cartwright, T. J., & Hallar, B. (2018). Taking risks with a growth mindset : long-term influence of an elementary pre-service after school science practicum. International Journal of Science Education, 40(3), 348–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1420269
     Google Scholar
  6. Constantinou, C. P., Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Rybska, E. (2018). What is inquiry-based science teaching and learning ? In O. E. Tsivitanidou, P. Gray, E. Rybska, L. Louca, & C. P. Constantinou (Eds.), Professional development for inquiry-based science teaching and learning (pp. 1–23). Springer International Publishing AG.
     Google Scholar
  7. Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
     Google Scholar
  8. Dilek, H., Tasdemir, A., Konca, A. S., & Baltaci, S. (2020). Preschool children’s science motivation and process skills during inquiry-based STEM activities. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 6(2), 92–104.
     Google Scholar
  9. Dobber, M., Zwart, R., Tanis, M., & van Oers, B. (2017). Literature review: The role of the teacher in inquiry-based education. Educational Research Review, 22, 194–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.002
     Google Scholar
  10. Ekici, M., & Erdem, M. (2020). Developing science process skills through mobile scientific inquiry. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100658
     Google Scholar
  11. Elisanti, E., Rudibyani, R. B., Sajidan, Prayitno, B. A., Perdana, R., & Wulandari, K. F. N. (2020). Analysis of Students Inquiry Skills in Senior High School Though Learning Based on the Hierarchy of Inquiry Model. Proceedings of the International Conference on Progressive Education (ICOPE 2019), 409-414. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200323.160
     Google Scholar
  12. Fitzgerald, M., Danaia, L., & McKinnon, D. H. (2019). Barriers inhibiting inquiry-based science teaching and potential solutions: Perceptions of positively inclined early adopters. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 543-566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9623-5
     Google Scholar
  13. Ghaemi, F., & Mirsaeed, S. J. G. (2017). The impact of inquiry-based learning approach on critical thinking skill of EFL students. EFL Journal, 2(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.21462/eflj.v2i2.38
     Google Scholar
  14. Hartanti, R. D. (2021). Profile of biology teachers’ understanding on socio-scientific issues (SSI) in Bantul Regency based on teaching experiences and gender. Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Science Education, 541(2020), 21–29.
     Google Scholar
  15. Jannah, N. L., Nursalim, M., & Sujarwanto, S. (2022). Representation analysis of science process skills with a neuropsycological view at elementary school. Edutec: Journal of Education and Technology, 6(1), 61–68.
     Google Scholar
  16. Ješková, Z., Balogová, B., & Kireš, M. (2018). Assessing inquiry skills of upper secondary school students Assessing inquiry skills of upper secondary school students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1076, 1-8.
     Google Scholar
  17. Kireš, M., & Jurková, V. (2021). Development of inquiry skills at lower secondary school level. Journal of Physics: Conference Series PAPER, 1929(012028), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1929/1/012028
     Google Scholar
  18. Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A., Darmaji, D., & Melsayanti, R. (2019). Students’ attitude towards natural sciences. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(3), 455–460. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i3.16395
     Google Scholar
  19. Liu, C., Zowghi, D., Kearney, M., & Bano, M. (2020). Inquiry-based mobile learning in secondary school science education : A systematic review. J Comput Assist Learn., September, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12505
     Google Scholar
  20. Marshall, J. C., Smart, J. B., & Alston, D. M. (2017). Inquiry-Based Instruction : A Possible Solution to Improving Student Learning of Both Science Concepts and Scientific Practices. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9718-x
     Google Scholar
  21. Megawati, L. A., & Sutarto, H. (2021). Analysis numeracy literacy skills in terms of standardized math problem on a minimum competency assessment. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 10(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v10i2.49540
     Google Scholar
  22. Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
     Google Scholar
  23. Rodríguez, G., Pérez, N., Núñez, G., Baños, J.-E., & Carrió, M. (2019). Developing creative and research skills through an open and interprofessional inquiry-based learning course. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 1–13.
     Google Scholar
  24. Schleicher, A. (2018). PISA 2018: Insights and interpretations (Report). OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA%202018%20Insights%20and%20Interpretations%20FINAL%20PDF.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  25. Setiono, S., Rustaman, N. Y., Rahmat, A., & Anggraeni, S. (2021). Inquiry skills for biology teacher candidates in plant anatomy practicum. Journal on Biology and Instruction, 1(2), 80–87.
     Google Scholar
  26. St. Pierre, E. A. (2019). Post qualitative inquiry in an ontology of immanence. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800418772634
     Google Scholar
  27. van Allen, J., & Zygouris-Coe, V. V. (2019). Using guided reading to teach internet inquiry skills: a case study of one elementary school teacher's experience. Reading Psychology, 40(5), 425-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2019.1623961
     Google Scholar
  28. Wale, B. D., & Bishaw, K. S. (2020). Effects of using inquiry-based learning on EFL students’ critical thinking skills. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(9), 1–14.
     Google Scholar