Developing Curricula in a Distance Learning Environment: Attending to the Different ‘Voices’

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

  •   Khetsiwe Eunice Mthethwa-Kunene

  •   Patience Dlamini

  •   Talent Rugube

  •   Cosmas Maphosa

Abstract

The offering of curricula that are relevant and responsive to the needs of society is the ultimate goal of any higher education institution. However, there is a need to engage in a curriculum development process that attends to the different ‘voices’ by addressing the needs of the different stakeholders. Stakeholders’ voices and needs can be ascertained and addressed through a curriculum development process that involves both internal and external stakeholders from the initial stages of developing curricula, throughout the various stages. Such a process may not be linear but interactive, iterative, and collaborative. This paper unpacks the curriculum development process focusing on the key stages of needs assessment, stating curriculum/programme goals, selecting curriculum content and teaching and learning activities, designing learning materials as well as evaluating. It unpacks the importance of attending to the different voices in coming up with relevant and market-driven curricula.


Keywords: Assessment, Curriculum, Development , Distance

References

Al-Jubran, K. M. (2020). A stakeholders approach for curriculum development of master’s degree in molecular diagnostics. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 11, 683691. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S261628.

Aliyeva, E. (2016). An Overview of the National Curriculum Development Process for Azerbaijan. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 6(1),13 - 26.

Bovill, C., Cook-Sather, A., Felten, P., Millard, L., & Moore-Cherry, N. (2016). Addressing potential challenges in co-creating learning and teaching: Overcoming resistance, navigating institutional norms and ensuring inclusivity in student–staff partnerships. Higher Education, 71(2), 195-208.

Bron, J., & Veugelers, W. (2014). Why we need to involve our students in curriculum design: Five arguments for student voice. Curriculum and teaching dialogue, 16(1/2), 125.

Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in higher education, 47(1), 1 - 32.

Chaudhary, S. V. S., & Reddy, M. V. (2018). Unit-7 Design and Preparation of Self-Instructional Materials. IGNOU.HYPERLINK http://www.egyankosh.ac.in/bitstream/123456789/47145/1/Unit-7.pdf”

Deeley, S. J., & Bovill, C. (2017). Staff student partnership in assessment: enhancing assessment literacy through democratic practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 463-477.

Deschaine, M. (2018). Supporting students with disabilities in k-12 online and blended learning. Lansing, MI: Michigan Virtual University. Retrieved from https://mvlri.org/research/publications/supporting-students-with-disabilities-in-k-12-online-and-blended-learning.

Dodd, B. J. (2020). Curriculum Design Processes. In J. K. McDonald & R. E. West, Design for Learning: Principles, Processes, and Praxis. EdTech Books. Retrieved from https://edtechbooks.org/id/curriculum_design_process

Dykes, G., Furdyk, M., Hassan, S., & Corriero, J. (2013). Promethean thinking deeper. From learner voice to emerging leaders, 6. Retrieved June, 20, 2013.

Erjavec, J. (2021). Stakeholders in curriculum development – case of Supply Chain and Logistics programme. 7th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd’21) Universitat Polit`ecnica de Val`encia, Val`encia, 2021 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/HEAd21.2021.12875.

Gravett, K., Kinchin, I. M., & Winstone, N. E. (2020). ‘More than customers’: conceptions of students as partners held by students, staff, and institutional leaders. Studies in Higher Education, 45(12), 2574-2587.

Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis?. London: The Falmer Press.

Gürel, E. & İşcan C. D. 2020. Reviewing the 9th Grade English Curriculum with Stake’s Responsive Evaluation Model According to Teachers Opinions. Qukurova Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 49(1), 501 - 554.

Gul, R. & Khilji, G. (2021). Exploring the need for a responsive school curriculum to cope with the Covid‑19 pandemic in Pakistan. Prospects, 51(1), 503 - 522.

Herring H. C. & Williams, J. R. (2000). The role of objectives in curriculum development. Journal of Accounting Education, 18(1), 1 - 14.

Hoyt-Oukada, K. (2003). Considering Students' Needs and Interests in Curriculum Construction. The French Review, 76(4), 721-737.

Human, N.E. (2017). The Role of a Responsive Curriculum In Optimising Learning In Higher Education. Unpublished Doctor of Education Thesis. Pretoria: University of South Africa.

Hussein, M. J., Yusuf, J., Deb, A. S., Fong, L., & Naidu, S. (2020). An evaluation of online proctoring tools. Open Praxis, 12(4), 509 - 525.

Jayaram, K., & Dorababu, K. K. (2015). Self-learning materials in the distance education system. International Journal of Current Research, 7(10), 21929 - 21934.

Jagersma, J. (2010). Empowering Students as Active Participants in Curriculum Design and Implementation. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED514196.pdf

Jeyaraj, J. J. (2020). Possibilities for critical pedagogy engagement in higher education: exploring students’ openness and acceptance. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(1), 27 - 38

Kettunen, J. (2015). Stakeholder relationships in higher education. Tertiary Education and Management, 21, 56 - 65.

Kilic, H. (2015). Preservice Teachers’ Perceptions About Teacher Knowledge. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1838 -1842.

Kliebard, H. (2000). Metaphorical roots of curriculum design. In William F. Pinar (Ed.), Curriculum Studies: The Reconceptualization (84-85). Troy, NY: Educator’s International Press.

Lac, V. T., & Cumings M. K. (2018). What do students have to do with educational leadership? Making a case for centering student voices. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 13(1), 38 - 58.

Iqbal, J., Mahmood, E., & Idrees, M. (2019). Effectiveness of Self Instructional Material of Distance Education. Pakistan Journal of Distance and Online Learning, 5(1), 71 - 90.

Manurung, K. (2017). Implementing interest based instructional materials to minimize EFL learners' speaking skills de-motivating factors. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(5), 356.

Maphosa, C., Bhebhe, S., & Rugube, T. (2019). Interrogating the Art of Developing Self-Learning Material for Open and Distance Learning (ODL) Students. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 8(6), 191-199.

Michigan Department of Education. (2018). Michigan administrative rules for special education (MARSE) with related IDEA federal regulations. Lansing, MI:.Retrieved from https://www.michigan.gov/documents/mde/MARSE_Supplemented_with_IDEA_Regs_379598_7.pdf.

Mohanasundaram, K. (2018). Curriculum design and development. Journal of applied and advanced research, 3(1), 4 - 6.

Mukaro, J. P. & Stears, M. (2017). Exploring the alignment of the intended and implemented curriculum through teachers’ interpretation: A case study of A-Level Biology practical work. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 723-740.

Nthontho, M. (2017). Children as stakeholders in education: Does their voice matter?. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 7(1), 1 - 7.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Education Working Papers.

Ornstein, A., & Hunkins, F. (2008). Curriculum foundations, principles, and issues (5th Ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Liao, J. Y. C., Sadik, O., & Ertmer, P. (2018). Evolution of teachers’ technology integration knowledge, beliefs, and practices: How can we support beginning teachers' use of technology?. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(4), 282 - 304.

Pak, K., Polikoff, M. S., Desimone, L. M., & Saldívar García, E. (2020). The Adaptive Challenges of Curriculum Implementation: Insights for Educational Leaders Driving Standards-Based Reform. AERA Open, 6(2), 2332858420932828.

Phillips, J. (2007). Curriculum Development. 2nd Ed. Selangor: Open University Malaysia

Rasilla, C. M. & Juárez, R. L. A. (2017). Multidisciplinary approach for curriculum design of professional master’s program with focusing on solidary economy in Oaxaca, Mex. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(14), 1317 – 1323.

Ryan, A. & Tilbury, D. (2013). Uncharted Waters: Voyages for Education for Sustainable Development in the Higher Education Curriculum. Curriculum Journal, 24(2), 272 - 294.

Saidi, R. M., Sharip, A. A., Abd Rahim, N. Z., Zulkifli, Z. A., & Zain, S. M. M. (2021). Evaluating Students' Preferences of Open and Distance Learning (ODL) Tools. Procedia Computer Science, 179, 955 - 961.

Taguma, M., Gabriel, F., Meow Hwee, L. I. M., & Expert, O. E. C. D. (2020). Future of Education and Skills 2030: Curriculum Analysis. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

Tuhkala, A., Ekonoja, A., & Hämäläinen, R. (2021). Tensions of student voice in higher education: Involving students in degree programme curricula design. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(4), 451-461.

Tyler, R. W. (1975). Specific approaches to curriculum development. Strategies for curriculum development, 1, 17 - 33.

Tyler, R.W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago press.

Yek, T. M. & Penney, D. (2006). Curriculum as praxis: Ensuring quality technical education in Singapore for the 21st century. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14(26), 1 - 29. Retrieved on 8 February 2022 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v14n26/.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Mthethwa-Kunene, K. E., Dlamini, P., Rugube, T., & Maphosa, C. (2022). Developing Curricula in a Distance Learning Environment: Attending to the Different ‘Voices’. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 3(3), 117–123. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.3.346

Most read articles by the same author(s)