Students’ Perceptions of Corrective Feedback in EFL Classrooms in Higher Education



Abstract Views
258

Downloads
211

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted May 22, 2022
Published Jun 21, 2022
10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.3.372

Abstract viewed = 258 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Feedback in general represents an essential aspect of the teaching and learning process. As such, it is also seen as closely connected to students’ academic achievement and development. This study examines students’ perceptions of three types of corrective feedback, such as explicit correction, elicitation, and recasts. Additionally, it aims to show the correlation between the academic achievement of students and corrective feedback. A self-designed questionnaire was used to collect data from a random sample of 37 students who attend Business English as a foreign language course. Analysis of the data showed that there is no correlation between corrective students’ perceptions of corrective feedback and their academic achievements. The study showed that students who get corrective feedback don’t feel embarrassed when being corrected, they also like it when they are corrected and see corrective feedback as help in improving their weak areas in language. Despite the lack of a correlation between students’ perceptions of corrective feedback and their academic achievement, this study recommends teachers use corrective feedback with students because students see it as a positive tool in language learning.

Keywords: Academic achievement, Corrective feedback, Explicit, Perceptions.

References

  1. Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102–118. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004.
     Google Scholar
  2. Dilans, G. (2010). Corrective Feedback and L2 Vocabulary Development: Prompts and Recasts in the Adult ESL Classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(6), 787–816. doi:10.3138/cmlr.66.6.787
     Google Scholar
  3. Ellis, R. (2008). A typology of written corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97–107.
     Google Scholar
  4. Ellis, R. (2017). Oral corrective feedback in L2 classrooms: What we know so far. In Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning (pp. 3-18). Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  5. Ferris, D. R., Liu, H., Sinha, A., & Senna, M. (2013). Written corrective feedback for individual L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 307–329. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.009.
     Google Scholar
  6. Ferris, D.R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the shorthand long-term effects of written error correction, pp. 81–1.
     Google Scholar
  7. Fu, M., & Li, S. (2022). The effects of immediate and delayed corrective feedback on L2 development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(1), 2–34.
     Google Scholar
  8. Gass, S.M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  9. Kim, H. R., & Mathes, G. (2001). Explicit vs. implicit corrective feedback. The Korea TESOL Journal, 4(1), 57–72.
     Google Scholar
  10. Li, S., & Vuono, A. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System. System., 84 (2019), 93–109.
     Google Scholar
  11. Li, S. (2020). What is the ideal time to provide corrective feedback? Replication of Li, Zhu & Ellis (2016) and Arroyo & Yilmaz (2018). Language Teaching, 53, 96–108.
     Google Scholar
  12. Loewen, S., and Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in adults English L2 classrooms: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90(4), 536–556.
     Google Scholar
  13. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative www.ccsenet.org/elt English Language Teaching, 4(2); June 2011 104 ISSN 1916-4742 E-ISSN 1916-4750 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 37–66.
     Google Scholar
  14. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719–758.Google Scholar.
     Google Scholar
  15. Tavakoli, M., & Zarrinabadi, N. (2016). Differential effects of explicit and implicit corrective feedback on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 247–259. doi:10.1080/17501229.2016.1195391.
     Google Scholar
  16. Ziv, N. The effect of teacher comments on the writing of four college freshmen. New directions in composition research, Guilford Press. 1984.
     Google Scholar