Presentation of the Correction Guide for the Approach-in-Process Test Version 2 and Its Application in the Content of “We Don’t Have Direct Access to Reality



Abstract Views
196

Downloads
240

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Oct 25, 2022
Published Nov 28, 2022
10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.6.497

Abstract viewed = 196 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The theory of students’ approaches to learning makes direct contributions to the teaching-learning process. For instance, it provides a conceptual repertoire that helps improve the teacher’s pedagogical practice and the student’s self-assessment of their own learning. Despite its contributions, the field of approaches has an important limitation: the measurement of its constructs is carried out exclusively by self-report tests. Although these measures have brought advances to the field, self-report is permeated by important biases that impair the quality of measurement. Considering this limitation, the Laboratory for Cognitive Architecture Research (LAICO) has initiated an agenda to develop performance-based tests for the measurement of approaches. The Approach-in-Process Test Version 2 is part of this agenda. It is a performance-based test that measures approach in the context of school/academic learning. In addition to the performance-based measurement, the test has two self-report measurements. The first measures the student’s perception of the impact of certain lessons on his or her deep approach to learning. The second measures the student’s perception of how often he or she manifests the deep approach to learning. The test items for the self-report measurements are multiple choice, while the items for the performance measure are open-ended in nature and require a correction guide. This paper presents, for the first time, the Correction Guide for the Approach-in-Process Test Version 2. In this paper, all the structural components of the correction guide are shown as well as its application to the specific content “we have no direct access to reality” taught in a particular university discipline. Applications of the Correction Guide in other teaching contents will be presented in future publications. They will show that the Approach-in-Process Test Version 2 can be applied and corrected in the diversity of school/academic contents.

Keywords: approach-in-process test (Version 2), students’ approaches to learning, test based on performance.

References

  1. Alves, A. F., Gomes, C. M. A., Martins, A., & Almeida, L. S. (2017). Cognitive performance and academic achievement: How do family and school converge? European Journal of Education and Psychology, 10(2), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejeps.2017.07.001.
     Google Scholar
  2. Alves, F. A., Flores, R. P., Gomes, C. M. A., Golino, H. F. (2012). Preditores do rendimento escolar: inteligência geral e crenças sobre ensino-aprendizagem [Predictors of school performance: general intelligence and teaching-learning beliefs]. Revista E-PSI, 1, 97-117. Portuguese. https://revistaepsi.com/artigo/2012-ano2-volume1-artigo5/.
     Google Scholar
  3. Alves, A. F., Gomes, C. M. A., Martins, A., & Almeida, L. S. (2016). Social and cultural contexts change but intelligence persists as incisive to explain children’s academic achievement. PONTE: International Scientific Research Journal, 72(9), 70–89. https://doi.org/10.21506/j.ponte.2016.9.6.
     Google Scholar
  4. Alves, A. F., Gomes, C. M. A., Martins, A., & Almeida, L. S. (2018). The structure of intelligence in childhood: age and socio-familiar impact on cognitive differentiation. Psychological Reports, 121(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294117723019.
     Google Scholar
  5. André, A. M., Gomes, C. M. A., Loureiro, C. M. V. (2016). Escalas Nordoff Robbins: uma revisão bibliográfica [Nordoff Robbins scale: A bibliography review]. Percepta, 3(2), 117–131, 2016. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.34018/2318-891X.3(2)117-131.
     Google Scholar
  6. André, A. M., Gomes, C. M. A., Loureiro, C. M. V. (2017). Equivalência de itens, semântica e operacional da versão brasileira da Escala Nordoff Robbins de Comunicabilidade Musical [Equivalence item, semantic and operational the Brazilian version of Nordoff Robbins Music Communicativeness Scale]. OPUS (belo horizonte. online), 23(2), 197–215. Portuguese. http://www.anppom.com.br/revista/index.php/opus/article/view/459.
     Google Scholar
  7. André, A. M. B., Gomes, C. M. A., & Loureiro, C. M. V. (2018). Reliability inter-examiners of the Nordoff Robbins Musical Communicativeness Scale brazilian version. In Davi Alves Mota & Tairone Nunes Magalhães, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of Students of Systematic Musicology. (pp. 101–105). Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1345176.
     Google Scholar
  8. André, A. M. B., Gomes, C. M. A., & Loureiro, C. M. V. (2019). Tradução e validação das Escalas Nordoff Robbins: “Relação criança terapeuta na experiência musical coativa” e “Musicabilidade, formas de atividades, estágios e qualidades de engajamento” [Translation and validation of the Nordoff Robbins Scales: “Child therapist relationship in coercive music experience” and “Musicability, forms of activities, stages and qualities of engagement”]. In Regina Antunes Teixeira dos Santos & Marcos Nogueira (eds.), Anais Completos do XIV Simpósio Internacional de Cognição e Artes Musicais (pp. 486–493). Campo Grande/MS. ISSN: 2236-4366.
     Google Scholar
  9. André, A. M. B., Gomes, C. M. A., & Loureiro, C. M. V. (2020a). Análise de confiabilidade da Escala de Comunicabilidade Musical [Reliability analysis of the musical communicativeness scale]. Per Musi, 40, 1–12. e204016. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.35699/2317-6377.2020.12459.
     Google Scholar
  10. André, A. M. B., Gomes, C. M. A., & Loureiro, C. M. V. (2020b). Confiabilidade inter-examinadores da Escala de Relação Criança-Terapeuta na Experiência Musical Coativa para validação no contexto brasileiro [Reliability inter-examiner of the child-therapist relationship in coactive musical experience scale for validation in the Brazilian context]. Revista Música Hodie, 20, e64243. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.5216/mh.v20.64243.
     Google Scholar
  11. André, A. M. B., Gomes, C. M. A., & Loureiro, C. M. V. (2020c). Confiabilidade inter-examinadores da versão brasileira da Escala Nordoff Robbins de Comunicabilidade Musical [Inter-examiner reliability of the Brazilian version of the Nordoff Robbins Scale of musical communicability]. In Javier Albornoz (org.), Estudos Latino-Americanos sobre Música: vol II. (pp. 152–163). Curitiba: Artemis. https://doi.org/10.37572/EdArt_13210092015.
     Google Scholar
  12. André, A. M. B., Gomes, C. M. A., & Loureiro, C. M. V. (2020d). Equivalência de itens, semântica e operacional da “Escala de Musicabilidade: Formas de Atividade, Estágios e Qualidades de Engajamento.” [Item, semantic and operational equivalence of the “Musicability Scale: forms of activity, stages and qualities of engagement.”]. Orfeu, 5(2), 1–22. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.5965/2525530405022020e0010.
     Google Scholar
  13. André, A. M. B., Gomes, C. M. A., & Loureiro, C. M. V. (2020e). Equivalência de itens, semântica e operacional da Escala Nordoff Robbins de Relação Criança-Terapeuta na Experiência Musical Coativa [Item, semantics, and operational equivalences of the child-therapist relationship in coactive musical experience scale]. Percepta, 8(1), 125–144. Portuguese. https://doi.org/1.34018/2318-891X.
     Google Scholar
  14. André, A. M. B., Gomes, C. M. A., & Loureiro, C. M. V. (2021a). Estudo de revisão da utilização das escalas Nordoff Robbins: “Relação Criança-Terapeuta na Experiência Musical Coativa” e “Musicabilidade: Formas de Atividade, Estágios e Qualidades de Engajamento [Review study of the use of Nordoff Robbins scales: “child-therapist relationship in coactive musical experience” and “musicability: forms of activity, stages and qualities of engagement]. Revista Música, 21(1), 443–468. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.11606/rm.v21i1.173943.
     Google Scholar
  15. André, A. M. B., Gomes, C. M. A., & Loureiro, C. M. V. (2021b). Measuring the structural validity of two Nordoff-Robbins scales for a patient with autism In Silvia Inés Del Valle Navarro & Gustavo Adolfo Juarez, Ciências humanas: estudos para uma visão holística da sociedade: vol I. (pp.51–66). Curitiba: Artemis. https://doi.org/10.37572/EdArt_2706213786.
     Google Scholar
  16. André, A. M. B., Gomes, C. M. A., & Loureiro, C. M. V. (2021c). Measuring the structural validity of two Nordoff-Robbins scales for a patient with tuberous sclerosis. In Francisca de Fátima dos Santos Freire (org.), Serviços e cuidados em saúde 3. (pp. 195–212). Ponta Grossa: Atena. https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.00221180619.
     Google Scholar
  17. Araújo, A. M., Gomes, C. M. A., Almeida, L. S., & Núñez, J. C. (2018). A latent profile analysis of first-year university students’ academic expectations. Anales De Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 35(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.35.1.299351.
     Google Scholar
  18. Cardoso, C. O., Seabra, A. G., Gomes, C. M. A., & Fonseca, R. P. (2019). Program for the neuropsychological stimulation of cognition in students: impact, effectiveness, and transfer effect on student cognitive performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01784.
     Google Scholar
  19. Casanova, J. R., Gomes, C. M. A., Bernardo, A. B., Núñez, J. C., & Almeida, L. S. (2021). Dimensionality and reliability of a screening instrument for students at-risk of dropping out from higher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100957.
     Google Scholar
  20. Castillo-Diaz, M.A., Gomes, C.M.A. (2022). Monitoring and intelligence as predictors of a standardized measure of general and specific higher education achievement. Trends in Psychol, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43076-022-00160-z.
     Google Scholar
  21. Costa, V. T., Gomes, C. M. A., Andrade, A. G. P., & Samulski, Di. M. (2012). Validação das propriedades psicométricas do RESTQ-Coach na versão brasileira [Validation of psychometric proprieties of the RESTQ-Coach Brazilian version]. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física, 18(2), 218–232. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-65742012000200002.
     Google Scholar
  22. Costa, B. C. G., Gomes, C. M. A., & Fleith, D. S. (2017). Validade da Escala de Cognições Acadêmicas Autorreferentes: autoconceito, autoeficácia, autoestima e valor [Validity of the Self-Referential Cognitions Scale: Self-concept, self-effiacy, self-esteem and value]. Avaliação Psicológica, 16(1), 87–97. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2017.1601.10.
     Google Scholar
  23. Dias, N. M., Gomes, C. M. A., Reppold, C. T., Fioravanti-Bastos, A., C., M., Pires, E. U., Carreiro, L. R. R., & Seabra, A. G. (2015). Investigação da estrutura e composição das funções executivas: análise de modelos teóricos [Investigation of structure and composition of executive functions: analysis of theoretical models]. Psicologia: teoria e prática, 17(2), 140–152. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.15348/1980-6906/psicologia.v17n2p140-152.
     Google Scholar
  24. Diaz, M. A. C., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2021a). Presenting the Meta-Performance Test, a metacognitive battery based on performance. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(2), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.7.2.289.
     Google Scholar
  25. Diaz, M. A. C., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2021b). Validade estrutural do Meta-Texto: evidências que permitem repensar os componentes metacognitivos. Conference [Structural validity of the Meta-Text: evidence that allows rethinking the metacognitive components] 10 Congresso Brasileiro de Avaliação Psicológica. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32944.48642.
     Google Scholar
  26. Ferreira, M. G., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2017). Intraindividual analysis of the Zarit Burden Interview: A Brazilian case study. Alzheimers & Dementia, 13, P1163–P1164. https://doi.org/0.1016/j.jalz.2017.06.1710.
     Google Scholar
  27. Fleith, D. S., Almeida, L. S., Marinho-Araujo, C. M., Gomes, C. M. A., Bisinoto, C., & Rabelo, M. L. (2020a). Validity evidence of a scale on academic expectations for higher education. Paidéia, 30, e3010. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-4327e3010.
     Google Scholar
  28. Fleith, D. S., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2019). Students’ assessment of teaching practices for creativity in graduate programs. Avaliação Psicológica, 18(3), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2019.1803.15579.10.
     Google Scholar
  29. Fleith, D, S., Gomes, C. M. A., Marinho-Araujo, C. M., & Almeida, L. S. (2020b). Expectativas de sucesso profissional de ingressantes na educação superior: estudo comparativo [Expectations of professional success of first-year university students: A comparative study]. Avaliação Psicológica, 19(3), 223–231. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2020.1903.17412.01.
     Google Scholar
  30. Gauer, G., Gomes, C. M. A., & Haase V. G. (2010). Neuropsicometria: Modelo clássico e análise de Rasch [Neuropsychometry: Classic model and rasch analysis]. In Avaliação Neuropsicológica, (pp. 22–30). Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2010. ISBN-10: 8536322101.
     Google Scholar
  31. Golino, H. F., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2011). Preliminary internal validity evidence of two Brazilian Metacognitive Tests. International Journal of Testing, 26, 11-12. https://www.intestcom.org/files/ti26.pdf.
     Google Scholar
  32. Golino, H. F., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2012). The Structural validity of the Inductive Reasoning Developmental Test for the measurement of developmental stages. International Journal of Testing, 27, 10–11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269985854_The_Structural_Validity_of_the_Inductive_Reasoning_Developmental_Test_for_the_Measurement_of_Developmental_Stages.
     Google Scholar
  33. Golino, H. F., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2014a). Four Machine Learning methods to predict academic achievement of college students: a comparison study. Revista E-Psi, 1, 68–101. https://revistaepsi.com/artigo/2014-ano4-volume1-artigo4/.
     Google Scholar
  34. Golino, H. F., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2014b). Psychology data from the “BAFACALO project: the brazilian intelligence battery based on two state-of-the-art models-carroll’s model and the chc model.” Journal of Open Psychology Data, 2(1), p.e6. https://doi.org/10.5334/jopd.af.
     Google Scholar
  35. Golino, H. F., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2014c). Visualizing random forest’s prediction results. Psychology, 5, 2084–2098. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.519211.
     Google Scholar
  36. Golino, H. F., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2015a). Aprendendo a ler a expressão de invariância dos parâmetros [Learning to read the invariance expression of parameters]. In Hudson F. Golino et al., Psicometria contemporânea: compreendendo os Modelos Rasch (pp. 47–80). São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo. ISBN: 97885845989.
     Google Scholar
  37. Golino, H. F., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2015b). Avançando na compreensão da invariância dos parâmetros: probabilidade e suas características [Advancing in the understanding of parameter invariance: probability and its characteristics]. In Hudson F. Golino et al., Psicometria contemporânea: compreendendo os Modelos Rasch (pp. 81–107). São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo. ISBN: 97885845989.
     Google Scholar
  38. Golino, H. F., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2015c). Investigando estágios de desenvolvimento do raciocínio indutivo usando a análise fatorial confirmatória, o modelo logístico simples de Rasch e o modelo de teste logístico linear (Rasch estendido) [Investigating developmental stages of inductive reasoning using confirmatory factor analysis, the Rasch simple logistic model and the linear logistic test model (extended Rasch)]. In Hudson F. Golino et al., Psicometria contemporânea: compreendendo os Modelos Rasch (pp. 283–338). São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo. ISBN: 97885845989.
     Google Scholar
  39. Golino, H. F., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2015d). O modelo logístico simples de Rasch para dados dicotômicos [Rasch’s simple logistic model for dichotomous data].In Hudson F. Golino et al., Psicometria contemporânea: compreendendo os Modelos Rasch (pp. 111–154). São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo. ISBN: 97885845989.
     Google Scholar
  40. Golino, H. F., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2015e). Teoria da medida e o modelo Rasch [Measure theory and the Rasch model]. In Hudson F. Golino et al., Psicometria contemporânea: compreendendo os Modelos Rasch (pp. 13–46). São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo. ISBN: 97885845989.
     Google Scholar
  41. Golino, H. F., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2016). Random forest as an imputation method for education and psychology research: its impact on item fit and difficulty of the Rasch model. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 39(4), 401–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2016.1168798.
     Google Scholar
  42. Golino, H. F. & Gomes, C. M. A. (2019) TDRI: Teste de Desenvolvimento do Raciocínio Indutivo. São Paulo: Hogrefe.
     Google Scholar
  43. Golino, H. F., Gomes, C. M. A., Amantes, A., & Coelho, G. (2015). Psicometria contemporânea: compreendendo os Modelos Rasch [Contemporary Psychometry: Understanding Rasch Models]. (1ªth ed., p. 416). São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo. ISBN: 97885845989.
     Google Scholar
  44. Golino, H. F., Gomes, C. M. A., & Andrade, D. (2014a). Predicting academic achievement of high-school students using machine learning. Psychology, 5, 2046–2057. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.518207.
     Google Scholar
  45. Golino, H. F., Gomes. C. M. A., Commons, M. L., & Miller, P. M. (2014b). The construction and validation of a developmental test for stage identification: Two exploratory studies. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 19(3), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100589.
     Google Scholar
  46. Golino, H. F., Gomes, C. M. A., & Peres, A. J. S. (2021). Creating an objective measurement for the ENEM: an analysis using the Rasch model. Psicologia: Teoria e Prática, 23(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.5935/1980-6906/ePTPPA12625.
     Google Scholar
  47. Gomes, C. M. A. (2002). Feuerstein e a construção mediada do conhecimento [Feuerstein and the mediated construction of knowledge].Porto Alegre: Artmed Editora.
     Google Scholar
  48. Gomes, C. M. A. (2005). Uma análise dos fatores cognitivos mensurados pelo Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (ENEM). [An analysis of the cognitive factors measured by the National High School Exam (ENEM)]. [Doctoral thesis, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais]. http://hdl.handle.net/1843/FAEC-85RJNN.
     Google Scholar
  49. Gomes, C. M. A. (2007a). Apostando no desenvolvimento da inteligência; em busca de um novo currículo educacional para o desenvolvimento do pensamento humano[Betting on the development of intelligence; in search of a new educational curriculum for the development of human thinking]. Rio de Janeiro: Lamparina.
     Google Scholar
  50. Gomes, C. M. A. (2007b). Softwares educacionais podem ser instrumentos psicológicos[Educational software can be psychological tools]. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 11(2), 391–401. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-85572007000200016.
     Google Scholar
  51. Gomes, C. M. A. (2010a). Avaliando a avaliação escolar: notas escolares e inteligência fluida[Evaluating the school evaluation: the grade schools and fluid intelligence]. Psicologia em Estudo, 15(4), 841–849. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-73722010000400020.
     Google Scholar
  52. Gomes, C. M. A. (2010b). Estrutura fatorial da Bateria de Fatores Cognitivos de Alta-Ordem (BaFaCalo) [Factorial structure of higher-order cognitive factors kit]. Avaliação Psicológica, 9(3), 449–459. Portuguese. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712010000300011&lng=pt.
     Google Scholar
  53. Gomes, C. M. A. (2010c). Perfis de estudantes e a relação entre abordagens de aprendizagem e rendimento Escolar [Students’ profiles and the relationship between learning approach and achievement]. Psico (PUCRS. Online), 41(4), 503–509. Portuguese. http://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistapsico/article/view/6336.
     Google Scholar
  54. Gomes, C. M. A. (2011a). Abordagem profunda e abordagem superficial à aprendizagem: diferentes perspectivas do rendimento escolar [Deep and surface approach to learning: different perspectives about academic achievement]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 24(3), 438–447. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722011000300004.
     Google Scholar
  55. Gomes, C. M. A. (2011b). Validade do conjunto de testes da habilidade de memória de curto-prazo (CTMC) [Short term memory ability tests kit validity (CTMC)]. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 16(3), 235–242. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-294X2011000300005.
     Google Scholar
  56. Gomes, C. M. A. (2012a). A estrutura fatorial do inventário de características da personalidade[The factor structure of the personal characteristics inventory] Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 29(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-166X2012000200007.
     Google Scholar
  57. Gomes, C. M. A. (2012b). Validade de construto do conjunto de testes de inteligência cristalizada (CTIC) da bateria de fatores cognitivos de alta-ordem (BaFaCAlO) [Construct validity of the set of crystallized intelligence tests from higher-order cognitive factors kit]. Gerais: Revista Interinstitucional de Psicologia, 5(2), 294–316. Portuguese. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-82202012000200009&lng=pt&tlng=pt.
     Google Scholar
  58. Gomes, C. M. A. (2013). A construção de uma medida em abordagens de aprendizagem [Learning approaches and their correlation with the teaching environment and individual characteristics in medical school]. Psico (PUCRS. Online), 44(2), 193–203. Portuguese. http://revistaseletronicas.pucrs.br/ojs/index.php/revistapsico/article/view/11371.
     Google Scholar
  59. Gomes, C. M. A. (2020a). Análises estatísticas para estudos de intervenção[Statistical analyzes for intervention studies]. In M. Mansur-Alves & J. B. Lopes-Silva, Intervenção cognitiva: dos conceitos às práticas baseadas em evidências para diferentes aplicações (pp. 93–107). Belo Horizonte: T.Ser.
     Google Scholar
  60. Gomes, C. M. A. (2020b). Programa de Enriquecimento Instrumental: evidências de eficácia para intervenção cognitiva [Instrumental Enrichment Program: evidence of efficacy for cognitive intervention]. In M. Mansur-Alves & J. B. Lopes-Silva, Intervenção cognitiva: dos conceitos às práticas baseadas em evidências para diferentes aplicações (pp. 621–639). Belo Horizonte: T.Ser.
     Google Scholar
  61. Gomes, C. M. A. (2021a). Apresentação de uma metodologia para criação de provas metacognitivas [Presentation of a methodology for creating metacognitive tests]. Conference. XVI Congresso Internacional Galego-Português de Psicopedagogia. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33129.62569.
     Google Scholar
  62. Gomes, C. M. A. (2021b). Avaliação educacional focada no processo: apresentando o teste SLAT-Thinking 2 [Process-focused educational assessment: Introducing the SLAT-Thinking 2 test]. Conference. XVI Congresso Internacional Galego-Português de Psicopedagogia. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24903.42408.
     Google Scholar
  63. Gomes, C. M. A. (2022a). Apresentação da Escala de Interesse em Pensar Reflexivamente [The presentation of interest scale on reflective thinking and its internal and external validity]. Preprint. https://doi.org/ 10.13140/RG.2.2.35149.51684.
     Google Scholar
  64. Gomes, C. M. A. (2022b). Apresentação do Teste Abordagem-em-Processo Versão 2 [Presentation of the approach-in-process test (version 2)]. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29156.24962.
     Google Scholar
  65. Gomes, C. M. A. (2022c). Projeto de Acesso Aberto: Escala de Abordagens de Aprendizagem (EABAP) [Open access project: learning approaches scale (EABAP)]. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/4edy7.
     Google Scholar
  66. Gomes, C. M. A., & Almeida, L. S. (2017). Advocating the broad use of the decision tree method in education. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 22(10), 1–10. https://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=22&n=10.
     Google Scholar
  67. Gomes, C. M. A., Almeida, L. S., & Núñez, J. C. (2017). Rationale and applicability of exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) in psychoeducational contexts. Psicothema, 29(3), 396–401. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.369.
     Google Scholar
  68. Gomes, C.M.A., Amantes, A., & Jelihovschi, E.G. (2020a). Applying the regression tree method to predict students’ science achievement. Trends in Psychology, 28, 99–117. https://doi.org/10.9788/s43076-019-00002-5.
     Google Scholar
  69. Gomes, C. M. A, Araujo, J., & Castillo-Díaz, M.A. (2021a). Testing the Invariance of the Metacognitive Monitoring Test. Psico-USF, 26(4), 685–696. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712021260407.
     Google Scholar
  70. Gomes, C. M. A., Araujo, J., & Jelihovschi, E. G. (2020b). Approaches to learning in the non-academic context: construct validity of Learning Approaches Test in Video Game (LAT-Video Game). International Journal of Development Research, 10(11), 41842–41849. https://doi.org/10.37118/ijdr.20350.11.2020.
     Google Scholar
  71. Gomes, C. M. A., Araujo, J., & Jelihovschi, E. G. (2022a). The current assessment of the student’s academic achievement is a big mistake. International Journal of Development Research, 12(03), 54795–54798. https://doi.org/10.37118/ijdr.24160.03.2022.
     Google Scholar
  72. Gomes, C. M. A., Araujo, J., & Jelihovschi, E. G. (2022b). Presentation of the Approach-In-Process Test (version 2). European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 3(4), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.4.402.
     Google Scholar
  73. Gomes, C. M. A., Araujo, J., Lima, I. P. C., Chaves, V. N. B., & Golino, H. F. (2021b). Inductive Reasoning Developmental Test-Second Revision (TDRI-SR): content validity. In Ezequiel Martins Ferreira (org.), A pesquisa em psicologia: contribuições para o debate metodológico. (pp. 36–9). Ponta Grossa: Atena. https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.1692115124.
     Google Scholar
  74. Gomes, C. M. A., Araujo, J., Nascimento, E., & Jelihovschi, E. (2018a). Routine psychological testing of the individual is not valid. Psychological Reports, 122(4), 157–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294118785636.
     Google Scholar
  75. Gomes, C. M. A., & Borges, O. N. (2007). Validação do modelo de inteligência de Carroll em uma amostra brasileira [Validation of Carroll intelligence model in one brazilian sample]. Avaliação Psicológica, 6(2), 167–179. Portuguese. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712007000200007&lng=en&tlng=pt.
     Google Scholar
  76. Gomes, C. M. A., & Borges, O. N. (2008a). Avaliação da validade e fidedignidade do instrumento crenças de estudantes sobre ensino-aprendizagem (CrEA) [Evaluation of the validity and reliability of the instrument students' beliefs about teaching and learning (CrEA)]. Ciências & Cognição (UFRJ), 13(3), 37–50. Portuguese. http://www.cienciasecognicao.org/revista/index.php/cec/article/view/60.
     Google Scholar
  77. Gomes, C. M. A., & Borges, O. (2008b). Limite da validade de um instrumento de avaliação docente [Validity limit of a faculty staff evaluation instrument]. Avaliação Psicológica, 7(3), 391–401. Portuguese. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712008000300011&lng=pt&tlng=pt.
     Google Scholar
  78. Gomes, C. M. A., & Borges, O. (2008c). Qualidades psicométricas de um conjunto de 45 testes cognitivos [Psychometric proprieties of a set of 45 cognitive tests]. Fractal: Revista de Psicologia, 20(1), 195–207. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-02922008000100019.
     Google Scholar
  79. Gomes, C. M. A. & Borges, O. N. (2009a). O ENEM é uma avaliação educacional construtivista? Um estudo de validade de construto [Is ENEM a constructivist educational assessment? A study of construct validity]. Estudos em Avaliação Educacional, 20(42), 73–88. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.18222/eae204220092060.
     Google Scholar
  80. Gomes, C. M. A., & Borges, O. N. (2009b). Propriedades psicométricas do conjunto de testes da habilidade visuo espacial [Psychometric proprieties of visual-spatial ability tests kit]. PsicoUSF, 14(1), 19–34. Portuguese. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-82712009000100004&lng=pt&tlng=pt.
     Google Scholar
  81. Gomes, C. M. A., & Borges, O. (2009c). Qualidades psicométricas do conjunto de testes de inteligência fluida [Psychometrical proprieties analysis of fluid intelligence tests kit]. Avaliação Psicológica, 8(1), 17–32. Portuguese. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712009000100003&lng=pt&tlng=pt.
     Google Scholar
  82. Gomes, C. M. A., Carneiro, I. J. P., & Soares, J. M. T. (2008). Aspectos processuais de programas de educação baseados no ensino do pensamento [Procedural aspects of education programs based on the teaching of thought]. In Anais Completos do IV Colóquio Franco Brasileiro de Filosofia da Educação, UERJ (pp. 1–19).
     Google Scholar
  83. Gomes, C. M. A., de Araújo, J., Ferreira, M. G., & Golino, H. F. (2014a). The validity of the Cattel-Horn-Carroll model on the intraindividual approach. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 19(4), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101078.
     Google Scholar
  84. Gomes, C. M. A., Farias, H. B., Araujo, J., & Jelihovschi, E. G. (2021c). Pruning trees, complexity cost may not be a good approach: initial evidence. Preprint OSF. http://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/4xcwm.
     Google Scholar
  85. Gomes, C. M. A., Farias, H. B., & Jelihovschi, E. G. (2022c). Approaches to learning do matter to predict academic achievement. Revista de Psicología, 40(2), 905–933. http://doi.org/ 10.18800/psico.202202.010.
     Google Scholar
  86. Gomes, C. M. A., Fleith, D. S., Marinho-Araujo, C. M., & Rabelo, M. L. (2020c). Predictors of students’ mathematics achievement in secondary education. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 36, e3638. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e3638.
     Google Scholar
  87. Gomes, C. M. A., & Gjikuria, J. (2017). Comparing the ESEM and CFA approaches to analyze the Big Five factors. Avaliação Psicológica, 16(3), 261-267. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2017.1603.12118.
     Google Scholar
  88. Gomes, C. M. A., & Gjikuria, E. (2018). Structural Validity of the School Aspirations Questionnaire (SAQ). Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 34, e3438. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e3438.
     Google Scholar
  89. Gomes, C. M. A., & Golino, H. F. (2012a). O que a inteligência prediz: diferenças individuais ou diferenças no desenvolvimento acadêmico? [What does intelligence predict: individual differences or academic development differences?]. Psicologia: teoria e prática, 14(1), 126–139. Portuguese. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-36872012000100010&lng=pt&tlng=pt.
     Google Scholar
  90. Gomes, C. M. A., & Golino, H. F. (2012b). Relações hierárquicas entre os traços amplos do Big Five [Hierarchical relationship between the broad traits of the Big Five]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 25(3), 445–456. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722012000300004.
     Google Scholar
  91. Gomes, C. M. A., & Golino, H. F. (2012c). Validade incremental da Escala de Abordagens de Aprendizagem (EABAP [Incremental validity of the Learning Approaches Scale]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 25(4), 400–410. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722012000400001.
     Google Scholar
  92. Gomes, C. M. A., & Golino, H. F. (2014). Self-reports on students’ learning processes are academic metacognitive knowledge. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 27(3), 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7153.201427307.
     Google Scholar
  93. Gomes, C. M. A., & Golino, H. F., (2015a). A medida de habilidades cognitivas amplas da Bateria de Fatores Cognitivos de Alta Ordem (BAFACALO): empregando o modelo Rasch bifatorial. [The measure of broad cognitive abilities from the Battery of Higher Order Cognitive Factors (BAFACALO): employing the bifactor Rasch model]. In Hudson F. Golino et al., Psicometria contemporânea: compreendendo os Modelos Rasch (pp. 361–385). São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo. ISBN: 97885845989.
     Google Scholar
  94. Gomes, C. M. A., & Golino, H. (2015b). Factor retention in the intra-individual approach: Proposition of a triangulation strategy. Avaliação Psicológica, 14(2), 273–279. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2015.1402.12.
     Google Scholar
  95. Gomes, C. M. A., Golino, H. F., & Costa, B. C. G. (2013). Dynamic system approach in psychology: proposition and application in the study of emotion, appraisal, and cognitive achievement. Problems of Psychology in the 21st Century, 6, 15–28. http://www.journals.indexcopernicus.com/abstracted.php?level=5&icid=1059487.
     Google Scholar
  96. Gomes, C. M. A., Golino, H. F., & Menezes, I. G. (2014b). Predicting school achievement rather than intelligence: does metacognition matter? Psychology, 5, 1095–1110. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.59122.
     Google Scholar
  97. Gomes, C. M. A., Golino, H. F., & Peres, A. J. S. (2016). Investigando a validade estrutural das competências do ENEM: quatro domínios correlacionados ou um modelo bifatorial. [Investigating the structural validity of ENEM competencies: four correlated domains or a bifactorial model]. Boletim na Medida (INEP-Ministério da Educação), 5(10), 33–30. Portuguese. http://portal.inep.gov.br/documents/186968/494037/BOLETIM+NA+MEDIDA+-+N%C2%BA+10/4b8e3d73-d95d-4815-866c-ac2298dff0bd?version=1.1.
     Google Scholar
  98. Gomes, C. M. A. Golino, H. F., & Peres, A. J. S. (2018b). Análise da fidedignidade composta dos escores do enem por meio da análise fatorial de itens [Composite reliability analysis of enem scores through item factor analysis]. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(8), 331–344. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2527904.
     Google Scholar
  99. Gomes, C. M. A., Golino, H. F., & Peres, A. J. S. (2020d). Fidedignidade dos escores do Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (Enem) [Reliability of the scores of the national high school exam (Enem)]. Psico (RS), 54(2), 1–10. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2020.2.31145.
     Google Scholar
  100. Gomes, C. M. A., Golino, H. F., & Peres, A. J. S. (2021d). Evidências desfavoráveis ao postulado de cargas fatoriais simples do Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (ENEM) [Evidence contrary to the assumption of simple factor loadings of the national high school education exam (ENEM)]. Avaliação Psicológica, 20(3). Portuguese. http://dx.doi.org/10.15689/ap.2021.2003.15777.05.
     Google Scholar
  101. Gomes, C. M. A., Golino, H. F., Pinheiro, C. A. R., Miranda, G. R., & Soares, J. M. T. (2011) Validação da Escala de Abordagens de Aprendizagem (EABAP) em uma amostra Brasileira. [Validation of the learning approach scale (LAS) in a Brazilian sample]. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 24(1), 19–27. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722011000100004.
     Google Scholar
  102. Gomes, C. M. A., Golino, H. F., Santos, M. T., & Ferreira, M. G. (2014c). Formal-Logic Development Program: Effects on Fluid Intelligence and on Inductive Reasoning Stages. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 4(9), 1234–1248. http://www.sciencedomain.org/review-history.php?iid=488&id=21&aid=4724.
     Google Scholar
  103. Gomes, C. M. A., & Jelihovschi, E. (2016). Proposing a new approach and a rigorous cut-off value for identifying precognition. Measurement, 93, 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.06.066.
     Google Scholar
  104. Gomes, C. M. A., & Jelihovschi, E. (2019). Presenting the regression tree method and its application in a large-scale educational dataset. International Journal of Research & Method in Education 43(2), 201–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2019.1654992.
     Google Scholar
  105. Gomes, C. M. A., Lemos, G. C., & Jelihovschi, E. G. (2020e). Comparing the predictive power of the CART and CTREE algorithms. Avaliação Psicológica, 19(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2020.1901.17737.10.
     Google Scholar
  106. Gomes, C. M. A., Lemos, G. C., & Jelihovschi, E. G. (2021e). The reasons why the regression tree method is more suitable than general linear model to analyze complex educational datasets. Revista Portuguesa de Educação, 34(2), 42–63. http://doi.org/10.21814/rpe.18044.
     Google Scholar
  107. Gomes, C. M. A, & Linhares. (2018). Investigação da validade de conteúdo do TAP-Pensamento. [Investigation of the content validity of the SLAT-Thinking]. Pôster. I Encontro Anual da Rede Nacional de Ciência para Educação (CPE). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31110.40006.
     Google Scholar
  108. Gomes, C. M. A., Linhares, I. S., Jelihovschi, E. G., & Rodrigues, M. N. S. (2021f). Introducing rationality and content validity of SLAT-Thinking. International Journal of Development Research, 11(1), 43264–43272. https://doi.org/10.37118/ijdr.20586.01.2021.
     Google Scholar
  109. Gomes, C. M. A., & Marques, E. L. L. (2016). Evidências de validade dos estilos de pensamento executivo, legislativo e judiciário [Validity evidence for the executive, legislative and judicial thinking styles]. Avaliação Psicológica, 15(3), 327–336. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.15689/ap.2016.1503.05.
     Google Scholar
  110. Gomes, C. M. A., Marques, E. L. L., & Golino, H. F. (2014d). Validade Incremental dos Estilos Legislativo, Executivo e Judiciário em Relação ao Rendimento Escolar. [Incremental validity of legislative, executive and judiciary styles in relation to school performance]. Revista E-Psi, 2, 31–46. Portuguese. https://revistaepsi.com/artigo/2013-2014-ano3-volume2-artigo3/.
     Google Scholar
  111. Gomes, C. M. A., & Nascimento, D. F. (2021a). A medida da habilidade de fluência do modelo CHC: apresentando o Teste de Fluência Ideativa 2 da Bateria de Fatores Cognitivos de Alta-Ordem (BAFACALO). [Measuring the fluency ability of the CHC model: presenting the Ideation Fluency Test 2 of the High-Order Cognitive Factors Battery (BAFACALO)]. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35726.28481/1.
     Google Scholar
  112. Gomes, C. M. A., & Nascimento, D. F. (2021b). Acesso aberto ao Teste de Fluência Figural da Bateria de Fatores Cognitivos de Alta-Ordem (BAFACALO) como medida da habilidade ampla de fluência do modelo CHC de inteligência. [Open access to the High-Order Cognitive Factors Battery Figural Fluency Test (BAFACALO) as a measure of the broad fluency ability of the CHC model of intelligence]. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15593.62564/1.
     Google Scholar
  113. Gomes, C. M. A., & Nascimento, D. F. (2021c). Acesso aberto e gratuito ao Conjunto de Testes de Inteligência Fluida: Teste de Raciocínio Geral da Bateria de Fatores Cognitivos de Alta-Ordem (BAFACALO). [Free and open access to the Fluid Intelligence Test Suite: High-Order Cognitive Factors Battery General Reasoning Test (BAFACALO)]. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30509.61921/1.
     Google Scholar
  114. Gomes, C. M. A., & Nascimento, D. F. (2021d). Acesso aberto e gratuito ao Teste de Fluência Ideativa 1 da BAFACALO. [Free and open access to the BAFACALO Idea Fluency Test 1]. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24821.09442/3.
     Google Scholar
  115. Gomes, C. M. A., & Nascimento, D. F. (2021e). Apresentando o Teste de Flexibilidade de Fechamento da BAFACALO. [Introducing the BAFACALO Closing Flexibility Test]. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31920.28164.
     Google Scholar
  116. Gomes, C. M. A., & Nascimento, D. F. (2021f). Disponibilizando de forma gratuita e aberta o Teste de Memória Associativa 1 da Bateria de Fatores Cognitivos de Alta-Ordem (BAFACALO). [Making available and free of charge the Associative Memory Test 1 of the High-Order Cognitive Factors Battery (BAFACALO)]. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29964.03201/1.
     Google Scholar
  117. Gomes, C. M. A., & Nascimento, D. F. (2021g). Disponibilizando de forma gratuita e aberta o Teste de Velocidade Numérica da BAFACALO. [Making Available for free and openly the BAFACALO Numerical Speed Test]. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24114.94407/1.
     Google Scholar
  118. Gomes, C. M. A. & Nascimento, D. F. (2021h). Evidências de validade do Teste de Abordagens de Aprendizagem: Identificação do Pensamento contido em Textos 2. [Validity evidence of the Learning Approaches Test: Identification of thought contained in Texts 2].Anais do XVI Congresso Internacional Galego-Português de Psicopedagogia, 1 a 3 de Setembro de 2021, UMinho, Braga, Portugal (pp. 2426–2438).
     Google Scholar
  119. Gomes, C. M. A., & Nascimento, D. F. (2021i). Medidas de inteligência cristalizada: disponibilizando o Teste de Compreensão Verbal 2 da Bateria de Fatores Cognitivos de Alta-Ordem (BAFACALO). [Measures of crystallized intelligence: making available the Verbal Comprehension Test 2 of the high-order cognitive factors Battery (BAFACALO)]. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36085.09447/1.
     Google Scholar
  120. Gomes, C. M. A., & Nascimento, D. F. (2021j). Medindo a habilidade de rapidez cognitiva do modelo CHC: apresentando o Teste de Velocidade Perceptiva 1 da BAFACALO. [Measuring the processing speed of the CHC model: Introducing the BAFACALO Perceptual Velocity Test 1]. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28564.83848/1.
     Google Scholar
  121. Gomes, C. M. A., & Nascimento, D. F. (2021k). Presenting slat-thinking second version and its content validity. International Journal of Development Research, 11(3), 45590–45596. https://doi.org/10.37118/ijdr.21368.03.2021.
     Google Scholar
  122. Gomes, C. M. A., & Nascimento, D. F. (2021l). Projeto de acesso aberto e gratuito à Bateria de Fatores Cognitivos de Alta-Ordem (BAFACALO): o Teste de Compreensão Verbal 1 do Conjunto de Testes de Inteligência Cristalizada. [Free and open access project to the High-Order Cognitive Factors Battery (BAFACALO): the Verbal Comprehension Test 1 of the Crystallized Intelligence Test Suite]. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22663.32165/1.
     Google Scholar
  123. Gomes, C. M. A., & Nascimento, D. F. (2021m). Projeto de acesso aberto e gratuito aos testes do LAICO: Teste de Raciocínio Lógico da Bateria de Fatores Cognitivos de Alta-Ordem (BAFACALO). [Free and open access project to LAICO tests: High-Order Cognitive Factors Battery Logical Reasoning Test (BAFACALO)]. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.25476.45445/1.
     Google Scholar
  124. Gomes, C. M. A., & Nascimento, D. F. (2021n). Projeto de acesso aos testes de inteligência da BAFACALO: Teste de Compreensão Verbal 3. [BAFACALO intelligence test access project: verbal comprehension Test 3]. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.10499.84001/2.
     Google Scholar
  125. Gomes, C. M. A., & Nascimento, D. F. (2021o). Projeto de acesso da BAFACALO: Teste de Memória Associativa 2. [BAFACALO Access Project: Associative memory test 2]. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23253.14565/1.
     Google Scholar
  126. Gomes, C. M. A., & Nascimento, D. F. (2021p). Teste de Memória Visual da Bateria de Fatores Cognitivos de Alta-Ordem (BAFACALO). [Visual memory test of the high-order cognitive factors battery (BAFACALO)]. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.33319.47529.
     Google Scholar
  127. Gomes, C. M. A., & Nascimento, D. F., & Araujo, J. (2021g). Acesso aberto ao Teste de Dobraduras (VZ) da BAFACALO. [Open access to the BAFACALO Fold Test (VZ)]. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21853.95201/2.
     Google Scholar
  128. Gomes, C. M. A., Nascimento, D. F., & Araujo, J. (2021h). Medindo a inteligência fluida: o Teste de Indução da Bateria de Fatores Cognitivos de Alta-Ordem (BAFACALO). [Measuring fluid intelligence: the High-Order Cognitive Factors Battery Induction Test (BAFACALO)]. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17087.84641/3.
     Google Scholar
  129. Gomes, C. M. A., & Nascimento, D. F., & Araujo, J. (2021i). Projeto de testes gratuitos e abertos do LAICO: Teste de Velocidade Perceptiva 3 da BAFACALO. [LAICO's free and open testing project: BAFACALO Perceptual Velocity Test 3]. Preprint. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36278.42563/2.
     Google Scholar
  130. Gomes, C. M. A., & Nascimento, D. F., & Araujo, J. (2021j). Teste de Velocidade Perceptiva 2 da Bateria de Fatores Cognitivos de Alta-Ordem (BAFACALO): disponibilização aberta e gratuita aos testes de medida de rapidez cognitiva do LAICO. [Perceptual Speed Test 2 of the High-Order Cognitive Factors Battery (BAFACALO): open and free availability to LAICO cognitive quickness tests]. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29567.53928/1.
     Google Scholar
  131. Gomes, C. M. A., Nascimento, E., & Peres, A. J. S. (2019). Investigating causal relations in personality by combining path analysis and Search algorithms. Poster. 3rd World Conference on Personality, World Association for Personality Psychology (WAPP), Hanoi, Vietnam.
     Google Scholar
  132. Gomes, C. M. A., Quadros, J. S., Araujo, J., & Jelihovschi, E. G. (2020f). Measuring students’ learning approaches through achievement: structural validity of SLAT-Thinking. Estudos de Psicologia, 25(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.22491/1678-4669.20200004.
     Google Scholar
  133. Gomes, C. M. A., & Rodrigues, M. N. S. (2021). Teste Abordagem-em-Processo. Preprint. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17602.71363/2.
     Google Scholar
  134. Gomes, C. M. A., & Rozenberg, M. P. (2021) Bi-factor hierarchical model of procrastination: presentation and initial evidence of validity. In Ezequiel Martins Ferreira (org.), A pesquisa em psicologia: contribuições para o debate metodológico 2. (pp. 137–156). Ponta Grossa: Atena. https://doi.org/10.22533/at.ed.30321151215.
     Google Scholar
  135. Gomes, C. M. A., & Valentini, F. (2019). Time series in educational psychology: application in the study of cognitive achievement. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(8), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3551953.
     Google Scholar
  136. Haase, V. G., Gauer, G., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2010). Neuropsicometria: modelos nomotético e ideográfico. [Neuropsychometry: nomothetic and ideographic models]. In Leandro Malloy-Diniz et al., Avaliação Neuropsicológica, (pp. 31–37). Porto Alegre: Artmed. ISBN-10: ‎8536322101.
     Google Scholar
  137. Jelihovschi, E. G., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2019). Proposing an achievement simulation methodology to allow the estimation of individual in clinical testing context. Revista Brasileira de Biometria, 37(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.28951/rbb.v37i4.423.
     Google Scholar
  138. Laros, J. A., Valentini, F., Gomes, C. M. A., & Andrade, J. M. (2014). Modelos de inteligência. [Intelligence Models].In A. G. Seabra, J. A. Laros, E. C. Macedo & N. Abreu (Eds.), Inteligência e funções executivas:Avanços e desafios para a avaliação neuropsicológica (pp. 17–38). São Paulo: Editora Memnon.
     Google Scholar
  139. Mansur-Alves, M., Gomes, C. M. A., Peixoto, C. B., Bocardi, M. B., Diniz, M. L. N., Freitas, S. K. P., Pereira, E. G., Alvares-Teodoro, J., Ribeiro, P. C. C., Teodoro, M. L. M. (2021). A longitudinal model for psychological distress in the COVID-19 crisis among Brazilian graduate students. PSICO(RS), 52(3), 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.15448/1980-8623.2021.3.41332.
     Google Scholar
  140. Martins, A. A., Gomes, C. M. A., Alves, A. F., Almeida, L. S. (2018). The structure of intelligence in childhood: age and socio-familiar impact on cognitive differentiation. Psychological Reports, 121(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294117723019.
     Google Scholar
  141. Matos, D. A. S., Brown, G. T. L., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2019). Bifactor invariance analysis of student conceptions of assessment inventory. Psico-USF, 24(4), 737–750. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712019240411.
     Google Scholar
  142. Mecca, T. P., Dias, N. M., Reppold, C. T., Muniz, M., Gomes, C. M. A., Fioravanti-Bastos, A., C., M., Yates, D. B., Carreiro, L. R. R., & Macedo, E. C. (2015). Funcionamento adaptativo: panorama nacional e avaliação com o adaptive behavior assessment system. [Adaptive behavior: national perspective and evaluation with adaptive behavior assessment system]. Psicologia: Teoria e Prática, 17(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.15348/1980-6906/psicologia.v17n2p107-122.
     Google Scholar
  143. Monteiro, S., Almeida, L. S., Gomes, C. M. A., & Sinval, J. (2020). Employability profiles of higher education graduates: a person-oriented approach. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1761785.
     Google Scholar
  144. Moura, M. D. G., Gomes, C. M. A., Blanc, S. L., Mesquita, R. A., & Ferreira, E. F. (2014). Development of questionnaire on dentists? knowledge of HIV/AIDS. Arquivos em Odontologia (UFMG. Online), 50(1), 6–12, 2014. https://doi.org/10.7308/aodontol/2014.50.1.01.
     Google Scholar
  145. Muniz, M., Gomes, C. M. A., & Pasian, S. R. (2016). Factor structure of Raven’s Coloured Progressive Matrices. Psico-USF, 21(2), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712016210204.
     Google Scholar
  146. Pazeto, T. C. B., Dias, N. M., Gomes, C. M. A., & Seabra, A. G. (2019). Prediction of arithmetic competence: role of cognitive abilities, socioeconomic variables, and the perception of the teacher in early childhood education. Estudos de Psicologia, 24(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.22491/1678-4669.20190024.
     Google Scholar
  147. Pazeto, T. C. B., Dias. N. M., Gomes, C. M. A., & Seabra, A. G. (2020). Prediction of reading and writing in elementary education through early childhood education. Psicologia: Ciência e Profissão, 40, e205497, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-3703003205497.
     Google Scholar
  148. Pereira, B. L. S., Golino, M. T. S., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2019). Investigando os efeitos do Programa de Enriquecimento Instrumental Básico em um estudo de caso único [Investigating the effects of the Basic Instrumental Enrichment Program in a single case study]. European Journal of Education Studies, 6(7), 35–52. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3477577.
     Google Scholar
  149. Pinheiro, C. A. R., Gomes, C. M. A., & Braga, A. G. (2009). Construção e validação do Inventário dos Adjetivos de Personalidade-50 (IAP-50). [Construction and validation of the Personality Adjectives Inventory-50 (IAP-50)] [Summary]. In Anais do IV Congresso Brasileiro de Avaliação Psicológica e XIV Conferência Internacional de Avaliação Psicológica: Formas e Contextos (p. 182). Campinas, SP: Instituto Brasileiro de Avaliação Psicológica.
     Google Scholar
  150. Pires, A. A. M., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2017). Three mistaken procedures in the elaboration of school exams: explicitness and discussion. PONTE International Scientific Research Journal, 73(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21506/j.ponte.2017.3.1.
     Google Scholar
  151. Pires, A. A. M., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2018). Proposing a method to create metacognitive school exams. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(8), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2313538.
     Google Scholar
  152. Reis, C. P., Morales, J. C. P., Gomes, C. M. A., Pereira, F. A. A., & Ibáñez, S. J. (2021). Construct validation of a new instrument to measure declarative tactical knowledge in basketball. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 128(4), 1712–1729. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125211016247.
     Google Scholar
  153. Reppold, C. T., Gomes, C. M. A., Seabra, A. G., Muniz, M., Valentini, F., & Laros, J. A. (2015). Contribuições da psicometria para os estudos em neuropsicologia cognitiva. [Contributions of psychometrics to studies in cognitive neuropsychology]. Psicologia: Teoria e Prática, 17(2), 94–106. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.15348/1980-6906/psicologia.v17n2p94-106.
     Google Scholar
  154. Ricci, K., Gomes, C. M. A., Nico, M. A. N., &, Seabra, A. G. (2020). Programa de Enriquecimento Instrumental (PEI) básico em crianças com TDAH e Dislexia. [Feuerstein Instrumental Enrichment (FIE) basic in children with ADHD and Dyslexia]. Psicologia desde el Caribe, 37(3), 1–29. Portuguese. http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/viewFile/12397/214421444770.
     Google Scholar
  155. Rodrigues, M. N. S., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2020). Testing the hypothesis that the deep approach generates better academic performance. International Journal of Development Research, 10(12), 42925–42935. https://doi.org/10.37118/ijdr.20579.12.2020.
     Google Scholar
  156. Rosa, M. A. C., Gomes, C. M. A., Rocha, N. S., Kessler, F. H. P., Slavutzky, S. M. B., Ferreira, E. F., & Pechansky, F. (2013). Dependence module of the MINI plus adapted for sugar dependence: psychometric properties. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 26(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722013000100009.
     Google Scholar
  157. Rosário, V. M., Gomes, C. M. A., & Loureiro, C. M. V. (2019). Systematic review of attention testing in allegedly “untestable” populations. International Journal of Psychological Research and Reviews, 2(19), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.28933/ijprr-2019-07-1905.
     Google Scholar
  158. Rosário, V. M., Loureiro, C. M. V., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2020). A relação entre música e atenção: fundamentos, evidências neurocientíficas e reabilitação. [The relationship between music and attention: foundations, neuroscientific evidence and rehabilitation]. Per Musi, 40, 1–18. E204015. Portuguese. https://doi.org/ 10.35699/2317-6377.2020.14912.
     Google Scholar
  159. Salami, S., Bandeira, P. F. R., Gomes, C. M. A., & Dehkordi, P. S. (2021) The Test of Gross Motor Development-Third Edition: a bifactor model, dimensionality, and measurement invariance. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 10(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2020-0069.
     Google Scholar
  160. Sampaio, R. T., Loureiro, C. M. V., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2015). A Musicoterapia e o Transtorno do Espectro do Autismo: uma abordagem informada pelas neurociências para a prática clínica. [Music therapy and Autism Spectrum Disorder: a neuroscience informed rationale for clinical practice]. Per Musi, 32, 137–170. Portuguese. https://doi.org/10.1590/permusi2015b3205.
     Google Scholar
  161. Silveira, M. B., Gomes, C. M. A., Golino, H. F., & Dias, F. S. (2012). Construção do Teste de Habilidade Experiencial (THE): Evidências iniciais de validade e confiabilidade. [Initial evidence of validity and reliability]. Revista E-psi, 1, 77–96. Portuguese. https://revistaepsi.com/artigo/2012-ano2-volume1-artigo4/.
     Google Scholar
  162. Silveira, M. S., & Gomes, C. M. A. (2014). Avaliação do desenvolvimento experiencial de pacientes com prótese ocular: a focalização no atendimento clínico. [Experiential development assessment of patients with prosthetic eye: focusing technique on psychotherapy]. Psicologia Clínica, 26(1), 181–196. Portuguese. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-56652014000100012&lng=pt&tlng=pt.
     Google Scholar
  163. Teodoro, M. L. M., Alvares-Teodoro, J., Peixoto C. B., Pereira E.G., Diniz, M. L. N., Freitas, S. K. P., Ribeiro, P. C. C., Gomes, C. M. A., & Mansur-Alves, M. (2021). Mental health in college students during covid-19 pandemic. REFACS, 9(2), 372–82. https://doi.org/10.18554/refacs.v9i2.5409.
     Google Scholar
  164. Valentini, F., Gomes, C. M. A., Muniz, M., Mecca, T. P., Laros, J. A., & Andrade, J. M. (2015). Confiabilidade dos índices fatoriais da Wais-III adaptada para a população brasileira. [Reliability of the factor index of the Wais-III adapted for the Brazilian population]. Psicologia: teoria e prática, 17(2), 123–139. Portuguese. https:// https://doi.org/10.15348/1980-6906/psicologia.v17n2p123-139.
     Google Scholar


Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.