Universitas Jember, Indonesia
* Corresponding author
Universitas Jember, Indonesia
Universitas Jember, Indonesia
Universitas Jember, Indonesia

Article Main Content

Combinatorials require critical thinking procedures and convincing reasoning in the problem-solving process. Indicators of the combinatorial skills include identifying some cases, recognizing patterns from all cases, generalizing all cases, proving mathematically, and considering with other combinatorial problems. To apply higher-order thinking skills, we apply research-based learning with a STEM approach. To develop student combinatorials, educators must also equip the learning process with teaching materials. This research develops RBL learning materials with a STEM approach to improve students’ combinatorial skills. The teaching materials that developed have met the criteria of valid, effective, and practical. The validity scores that obtained on each device were 3.66 for RTM, 3.53 for MFI, and 3.69 for THB. The observation results of learning implementation were 3.79 with a percentage of 94.75%, and student responses were 97% positive so that they met practical criteria. Based on the test results, researchers found that 82.75% of students were complete so that they met the effective criteria.

References

  1. Anggraeni, Dafik, dan I. M. Tirta (2019). The analysis of the application of discovery learning in improving student’s combinatorial thinking skill to solve local super antimagic face coloring problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1211(1), 1–15.
     Google Scholar
  2. Asy’ari, M. L. (2022). The development of research-based learning materials with a stem approach to improve students’ generalization thinking skills in solving graceful coloring problems. Jember: Universitas Jember.
     Google Scholar
  3. Cahyanti, A. E. (2016). Mathematical learning tools with a scientific approach to problem-based learning models and high order thinking material for class X vocational high school lines and series. Jember: Universitas Jember.
     Google Scholar
  4. Dafik (2015). Handbook for the Implementation of RBL (Research Based Learning) in the Courses. Jember: Universitas Jember.
     Google Scholar
  5. Dafik. (2016). Development of PBR (Research Based Learning) in The Course Impact of PBR in Unej Environment. Jember: University of Jember.
     Google Scholar
  6. Dafik, Sucianto, B., Irvan, M., & Rohim, M. A. (2019). The analysis of student metacognition skill in solving rainbow connection problems under the implementation of research-based learning model. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 594–610.
     Google Scholar
  7. Fathoni, A., Muslim, S., Ismayati, E., Rijanto, T., Munoto, & Nurlaela, L. (2020). STEM: Innovation in Vocational Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 17(1), 33–42
     Google Scholar
  8. Gita, R. S. D., Waluyo, J., Dafik, & Indrawati. (2021). On the shrimp skin chitosan stem education research-based learning activities: obtaining an alternative natural preservative for processed meat. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 747(1), 1–13.
     Google Scholar
  9. Hsu, Y. S., dan Yeh, Y. F. (2019). Asia-Pacific STEM Teaching Practices. Springer, Singapore.
     Google Scholar
  10. Humaizah, R., Dafik, I. M. Tirta, Z. R. Ridlo. dan Susanto. (2022). Research-based learning activity framework with stem approach: implementing strong dominating set technique in solving highway cctv placement to enhance students’ metaliteracy. Pancaran Pendidikan FKIP Universitas Jember, 11(1), 90–102.
     Google Scholar
  11. Khairani, Mukhni, Aini, F. Q. (2018). STEM-based learning in calculus lectures in universities. UNINUS: Journal published 03(02), 104–111.
     Google Scholar
  12. Mulyani, T. (2019). STEM learning approach to facing the industrial revolution 4.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana (PROSNAMPAS), 2(1), 453–460.
     Google Scholar
  13. Ridlo, Z. R., Indrawati, Afafa, L., Bahri, S., Kamila, I. S., & Rusdianto. (2021). The effectiveness of research-based learning model of teaching integrated with computer simulation in astronomy course in improving student computational thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1839(1), 1–13.
     Google Scholar
  14. Ridlo, Z. R., Dafik, & Nugroho, C. I. W. (2020). Report and recommendation of implementation research-based learning in improving combinatorial thinking skills embedded in STEM parachute design activities assisted by ccr (cloud classroom). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1414–1429.
     Google Scholar
  15. Salimi, M., Susiani, T. S., & Hidayah, R. (2017). Research-based learning as an alternative learning model in educational personnel educational institutions. Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 3(1), 1-9.
     Google Scholar
  16. Sanders, M. E. (2009). Integrative STEM: Primer (in some places titled STEM), STEM Education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68 (4), 20–26.
     Google Scholar
  17. Suntusia, Dafik, & Hobri. (2019). The effectiveness of research-based learning in improving students’ achievement in solving two-dimensional arithmetic sequence problems. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 18–32.
     Google Scholar
  18. Susiani, T. S., Salimi, M., dan Hidayah, R. (2018). Research based learning (rbl): how to improve critical thinking skills? SHS Web of Conferences. 42(00042). EDP Sciences.
     Google Scholar
  19. Tsupros, N., R. Kohler, dan J. Hallien. (2009). STEM Education: A Project to Identify the Mitheng Components. A collaborative study by the IUI Center for STEM Educational and Carnegie Mellon University.
     Google Scholar
  20. White, D. W. (2014). What is STEM education and why is it important. Florida Association of Teacher Educators Journal. 1(14), 1–9.
     Google Scholar