##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of problem-based learning integrated with STEM on learning outcome. In this study, reanalysis of the data from previous studies regarding the effect of the problem-based learning integrated with STEM on learning outcomes. This research used a systematic review method with quantitative techniques (meta-analysis). The results of previous studies related to the effect of the PBL integrated with STEM on learning outcomes that have been published in a journal were analyzed using meta-analysis techniques. The data were collected using an instrument in the form of a meta-analysis coding sheet. There are 21 articles analyzed. The technique used is to measure the value of the effect size from experimental results in these scientific articles. Based on the research that has been done, it is known that the PBL integrated with STEM has an effect on improving learning outcomes. This can be seen from the average effect size value of 1.28 with a high effect category. In addition, from the acquisition of this effect size value, it is known that PBL with STEM also has an effect on improving learning outcomes in terms of education levels (elementary school, junior high school, senior high school or college levels) and subjects (mathematics, chemistry, physics biology, science for elementary and junior high school). Based on this research, it can be concluded that the PBL integrated with STEM has an effect on improving student learning outcomes at various levels of education and various subjects.

References

  1. Adiwiguna, P S. et al. (2019). Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Berorientasi STEM Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dan Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas V SD di Gugus I Gusti Ketut Pudja [The Effect of STEM-Oriented Problem Based Learning (PBL) Models on the Ability to Think Critically and Science Literacy of Fifth Grade Elementary School Students in Gugus I Gusti Ketut Pudja]. PENDASI: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 3(2), 94–103.
     Google Scholar
  2. Anazifa, R D et al. (2017). Project-based learning and problem-based learning are effective to improve students’ thinking skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 346–355.
     Google Scholar
  3. Amalya,Cut Putri, et al. (2021). Implementation of the problem base learning model combined with E-STEM based student worksheets on learning outcomes and self-efficacy on environmental pollution materials. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 7, 34–38.
     Google Scholar
  4. Arifin, N. (2020). Efektifitas Pembelajaran STEM Problem Based Learning Ditinjau dari Daya Juang dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Mahasiswa PGSD [The Effectiveness of STEM Learning Problem Based Learning in View of the Fighting Power and Ability of Students to Solve Mathematical Problems]. JPMI, 5(1), 31–38.
     Google Scholar
  5. Arikunto. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian, Suatu Studi Pendekatan Praktek. [Research procedure, a practice approach study] Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
     Google Scholar
  6. Ariyatun, et.al. (2020). Pengaruh model problem-based learning terintegrasi STEM Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Journal of Educational Chemistry, 2 (1), 33–39.
     Google Scholar
  7. Becker, and park. (2011). Effect of Integrative approach among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subject on student’s learning: Apreliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education, 12 (4), 23–37.
     Google Scholar
  8. Birgili, Bengi. (2015). Creative and crtical thinking skills in problem-based learning environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Cteativity, 2(2), 71–80.
     Google Scholar
  9. Clarissa, Deyana Putri, et al. (2020). Problem Based Learning Terintegrasi STEM Era Pandemi Covid-19 Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. JIPI (Jurnal IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA), 4(2), 193–204.
     Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, Manion, & Morrison. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences. Hillsdale N. Erlbaum Associates. Jurnal Penelitian. 14 (1), 147–152.
     Google Scholar
  11. DeCoster, J., Iselin, A.-M. R., & Gallucci, M. (2009). A conceptual and empirical examination of justifications for dichotomization. Psychological Methods, 14(4), 349–366.
     Google Scholar
  12. Dotimineli dan Mawardi, (2021). Development of stem integrated pbl-based student worksheets in energetic materials of first-year students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1788/1/012045.
     Google Scholar
  13. Fadhilah,N, et .al. (2022). Integrasi STEM-Problem Based Learning melalui Daring Terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi [STEM-problem based learning integration through online against critical thinking skills of biology education students]. Jurnal IPA dan Pembelajaran IPA, 6(1), 1–10.
     Google Scholar
  14. Hadi, F, et.al. (2021). Efektifitas Model Pbl Terintegrasi STEM Terhadap Kemampuan [The Effectiveness of STEM Integrated PBL Models on Capability]. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(3), 6644-6649
     Google Scholar
  15. Hasanah, Z, et. al. (2021). Implementasi Model Problem Based Learning Dipadu LKPD Berbasis STEM untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis pada Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan [The effectiveness of STEM integrated pbl models on capability]. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Science Education), 9(1), 65–75. DOI: 10.24815/jpsi.v9i1.18134.
     Google Scholar
  16. Hasanah, Z, et. al. (2021). the implementation of problem-based learning integrated with STEM based worksheets to improve learning motivation. Asian Journal of Science Education. 3(2), 102–112.
     Google Scholar
  17. Hewi, La et. al. (2020). Refleksi Hasil PISA (The programme for international student assessment): Upaya Perbaikan Bertumpu Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini). Journal Golden Age, 4 (1), 30–41.
     Google Scholar
  18. Inpinit, Jessada, et. al. (2016). The Effect of Using PBL with the STEM Education Concept. International Conference on Mathematics, Engineering and Industrial Applications, AIP Conf. Proc. 1775, 030037-1–030037-6; doi: 10.1063/1.4965157.
     Google Scholar
  19. Khoiri. (2019). Meta analysis study: effect of STEM (Science Technology Engineering and Mathematic) towards Achievement. Formatif. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 9(1), 71–82.
     Google Scholar
  20. Kulsum, U, et. al. (2018). The effect of a stem approach with the problem-based learning model on communicative skills and student learning outcomes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 3(2), 58–70.
     Google Scholar
  21. Laisnima, Lhony. (2020). Modul Pembelajaran Berbasis Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar dan Keterampilan Proses Pesrta Didik Pada Materi Redoks dan Sel Elektrolisis [Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) Based Learning Modules to Improve Student Learning Outcomes and Process Skills in Redox Material and Electrolytic Cells]. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia, 8(2),84–90.
     Google Scholar
  22. Mostafa, M, et al. (2021). Efektivitas Model pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Berbasis STEM Terhadap Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa [The effectiveness of the STEM-Based problem-based learning learning model on increasing students’ critical thinking ability]. Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia. 1 (3), 375–384.
     Google Scholar
  23. Ningsih, F, et. al. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran PBL Terintegrasi STEM Untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas Dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Di Kelas XII Ipa 5 SMAN 7 Padang [Application of the STEM Integrated PBL Learning Model to Increase Student Activities and Learning Outcomes in Class XII Ipa 5 SMAN 7 Padang]. Pillar of Physics Education., 13(3), 443–450.
     Google Scholar
  24. Nurazmi, et al. (2021). Integrated stem-problem based learning model: its effect on students’ critical thinking. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal, 4(2), 70–77.
     Google Scholar
  25. Parno, et al. (2018). The influence of PBL-STEM on students’ problemsolving skills in the topic of optical instruments. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1171 (2019), 012013. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1171/1/012013.
     Google Scholar
  26. Parno, et al. (2020). A case study on comparison of high school student’s scientific literacy competencies domain different methods: PBL-STEM education, PBL, and conventional learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9 (2), 159–168.
     Google Scholar
  27. Pourshanazari A, Roohbakhsh A, Khazaei M, Tajadini H. (2013). Comparing the long-term retention of a physiology course for medical students with the traditional and problem-based learning. Adv Health Sci Educ, 18(1), 91-97.
     Google Scholar
  28. Prastika, Frissa, et al. (2021). Implementation of problem-based learning-stem strategy on students’ conceptual understanding and critical thinking in fundamental of chemical equilibrium. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 20(1), 1–6.
     Google Scholar
  29. Putri, C.D. et al. (2020). Problem based learning terintegrasi STEM di era pandemi covid-19 untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa Padang [STEM integrated problem-based learning in the era of the co-19 pandemic to improve the critical thinking skills of Padang students]. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA,4(2),193–204.
     Google Scholar
  30. Putri, Yullya, et.al. (2021). The influence of PBL-STEM on students’ problem-solving skills in the topic of optical instruments. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1171 (2019) 012013. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1171/1/012013.
     Google Scholar
  31. Rachmatullah, Reza, et al. (2020). The challenge of elementary school teachers to encounter superior generation in the 4.0 industrial revolution: study literature. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research. 9(4), 1879-1882.
     Google Scholar
  32. Rahmadani, D. (2017). Short analysis review of developing method study in integrating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) approach in problem-based learning model towards students’ problem-solving ability. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education. 2016 April, p.140–142.
     Google Scholar
  33. Selisne, M, et al. (2019). role of learning module in STEM approach to achieve competence of physic learning. IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1185 (2019) 012100. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1185/1/012100.
     Google Scholar
  34. Setyorini, A, et.al. (2021). Problem-based learning with science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (stem) approach to improve critical thinking skills and conceptual understanding of junior high school students. Journal of Science Education and Practice, 5(2), 54–73.
     Google Scholar
  35. Suralaga, Fadhilah dan Solicha. (2010). Psikologi Pendidikan [Psychology of Education]. Jakarta: Lembaga Penelitian UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
     Google Scholar
  36. Umi, K, et.al. (2020). The Effect of A STEM approach with the problem-based learning model on communicative skills and student learning outcomes. ScienceEdu: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, III(2), 58–70.
     Google Scholar
  37. Usmeldi U., Amini, R., & Trisna, S. (2017). The development of research-based learning models with science, environment, technology, and society approaches to improve critical thinking of students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 318–325.
     Google Scholar
  38. Winarni, J Zubaidah dkk. (2016). STEM: Apa, Mengapa, dan Bagaimana. Prosiding Semnas Pend IPA Pascasarjana UM [STEM: what, why, and how. proceedings of semnas pend IPA postgraduate UM]. Pros Semnas Pend IPA Pasca Sarjana UM, Vol 1 (1): 976–984.
     Google Scholar
  39. Winda, Z et.al. (2019). Hasil belajar mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran modul larutan elektrolit dan sifat koligatif larutan berbasis STEM-Problem based learning program studi pendidikan kimia [Student learning outcomes in learning electrolyte solution modules and colligative properties of solutions based on STEM-Problem based learning chemistry education study program]. Jurnal penelitian Pendidikan Kimia: Kajian Hasil Penelitian Pendidikan Kimia, 6(1), 12–17.
     Google Scholar
  40. Yew, Elaine Hj, et.al. (2016). Problem-based learning: an overview of its process and impact on learning. Health Profession Education, 2,75–79.
     Google Scholar
  41. Yujun Lee, et al. (2019). Effective mathematics engagement: a comparison of stem pbl versus non-stem pbl instruction. Can. J. Sci. Math. Techn. Educ, 19, 270–289.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)