##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

This paper explores the pedagogical value of teaching ancient Greek religion as a means to cultivate critical thinking in today’s educational context. While often viewed as a historical curiosity or mythological study, ancient Greek religion offers rich opportunities for students to engage with complex narratives, ethical dilemmas, and philosophical inquiries. By analyzing myths, grappling with moral questions, and exploring the intersection of religion and philosophy, students develop essential critical thinking skills such as analysis, interpretation, and ethical reasoning. Additionally, comparative analysis of Greek religious beliefs with those of other cultures broadens students’ perspectives, encouraging them to consider the influence of cultural and historical contexts on religious thought. Ultimately, this paper argues that integrating ancient Greek religion into modern curricula not only enriches students’ understanding of the past but also equips them with the critical thinking abilities necessary for navigating the complexities of the contemporary world.

Introduction

In an increasingly complex and interconnected world, critical thinking is a vital skill for students to develop. Educators continually seek effective methods to cultivate this ability in their students. One underappreciated yet potent resource for fostering critical thinking is the study of ancient Greek religion. While often relegated to the domain of history or mythology, ancient Greek religion offers rich opportunities for students to engage with complex narratives, moral dilemmas, and philosophical inquiries. This paper argues that teaching ancient Greek religion can play a crucial role in cultivating critical thinking by encouraging students to analyze, interpret, and evaluate the beliefs, myths, and cultural practices of an influential civilization.

The Nature of Critical Thinking

Critical thinking is not just a skill but a mindset that encourages students to approach problems with curiosity and skepticism. It involves questioning assumptions, exploring alternative solutions, and making decisions based on careful reasoning rather than impulsive judgments (Dilekçi & Karatay, 2023; Gafour & Gafour, 2020). In today’s rapidly changing world, where misinformation and complex societal challenges abound, the ability to think critically is more crucial than ever for at least five reasons:

1) Misinformation and Disinformation: The internet and social media have made it easier for misinformation and disinformation to spread quickly and widely. Fake news, conspiracy theories, and biased reporting can easily mislead individuals. Critical thinking skills enable people to assess the credibility of sources, differentiate between facts and opinions, and recognize biased or manipulative content. In a media-saturated environment, critical thinking is essential for media literacy. Individuals need to analyze and evaluate the vast amount of information they encounter daily to make informed decisions and avoid being swayed by false narratives (Benjamin & McLean, 2022; Joshiet al., 2022; Lee, 2022).

2) Complex Societal Challenges: Modern society faces a range of complex challenges, from climate change and public health crises to social justice issues and technological advancements. These problems often have no simple solutions and require the ability to analyze multiple perspectives, consider long-term consequences, and make reasoned judgments. Addressing these challenges often requires interdisciplinary approaches that combine knowledge from various fields. Critical thinking allows individuals to integrate different types of information, weigh the trade-offs, and develop innovative solutions (Bailin, 1987; Brazdauskas, 2015; Ferrarelloet al., 2021; Tobón & Luna-Nemecio, 2021).

3) Rapid Technological Change: The pace of technological change is accelerating, with new tools and platforms constantly emerging. Critical thinking helps individuals adapt to these changes by enabling them to learn new skills, evaluate the ethical implications of technology, and anticipate potential future impacts. As technology evolves, so do concerns about digital privacy and security. Critical thinkers are better equipped to understand these issues, make informed decisions about their digital footprints, and protect themselves from cyber threats (Ainslieet al., 2023; Gibson, 2015; Lin & Wu, 2016; Strom & Strom, 2002; Yılmaz, 2021).

4) Democratic Participation: In a democratic society, citizens are expected to participate in decision-making processes, whether through voting, public debate, or community involvement. Critical thinking is essential for making informed choices, understanding the implications of policies, and engaging in constructive dialogue with others. Today’s political landscape is increasingly polarized, with extreme viewpoints often dominating discourse. Critical thinking encourages open-mindedness and the ability to consider alternative perspectives, which is crucial for finding common ground and fostering civil discourse (Browne, 2014; Dixon, 2018; Ekström & Östman, 2015; Faraon, 2018; Magioglou, 2008; Rosenberg, 2007).

5) Workplace and Career Demands: Employers increasingly value critical thinking as a key competency in the workplace. Employees who can analyze problems, generate solutions, and make decisions based on evidence are more likely to succeed in dynamic work environments. In a world where job roles and industries are constantly evolving, critical thinking supports lifelong learning. It enables individuals to continuously adapt, acquire new knowledge, and stay relevant in their careers (Basaduret al., 2014; Claxton & Lucas, 2007; Sacramentoet al., 2013; Schieman & Young, 2010; Tripathy, 2018).

Educators play a pivotal role in fostering critical thinking. Designing curricula that incorporate problem-solving activities, debates, case studies, and opportunities for reflective thinking can help students develop these skills. Integrating diverse perspectives into the curriculum also encourages students to appreciate the complexity and resist the oversimplification of issues (Afzalet al., 2023; Jofili, 1996; Mastul, 2024; Nykyporetset al., 2023; Pithers & Soden, 2000).

Critical thinking extends beyond academic achievement. In everyday life, it enables individuals to make informed decisions, understand different viewpoints, and contribute thoughtfully to society. Whether navigating media literacy, making ethical choices, or engaging in democratic processes, critical thinking equips students to handle the demands of the modern world with confidence and discernment.

This approach underscores the necessity of embedding critical thinking throughout educational experiences, ensuring that students are not only knowledgeable but also capable of applying their knowledge in thoughtful, reflective ways.

Ancient Greek Religion: A Rich Pedagogical Resource

Ancient Greek religion, often perceived merely as a collection of myths and rituals, is, in fact, a profoundly intricate system of beliefs that deeply influenced every aspect of ancient Greek society. This religious framework is not only a reflection of the ancient Greeks’ spiritual practices but also an embodiment of their cultural values, social structures, and philosophical inquiries. Understanding ancient Greek religion requires an appreciation of its multifaceted nature, where myth, ritual, and philosophy intersect to address fundamental human concerns (Brandon, 2024; Eidinow, 2011; Kindt, 2012; Rask, 2023).

The myths of ancient Greece are far more than entertaining stories; they are dense with symbolic meaning and philosophical depth. Each myth serves as a lens through which we can examine the values, fears, and aspirations of the society that created them. For instance, the myth of Prometheus, who defied Zeus to bring fire to humanity, speaks to themes of rebellion, the pursuit of knowledge, and the consequences of challenging authority (Blanariu, 2017; Dougherty, 2006; Stroumsa, 1987; Trousson, 2015). Similarly, the tale of Orpheus and Eurydice explores the profound power of love and the inevitability of death, themes that resonate across cultures and eras. These myths often grapple with universal human concerns that remain relevant today. Justice, power, love, fate, and the nature of the divine are central themes in many Greek myths (Bowra, 1952; Hardman, 1990; Lee, 1960; Meintjes, 2022; Murdoch, 2024; Rider, 1988; Sundt, 2021). For example, the story of King Oedipus, who is doomed to fulfill a tragic prophecy despite his best efforts to avoid it, raises questions about free will versus predestination—a philosophical debate that continues to intrigue scholars and thinkers (Kai, 2023; Köse, 2022; Ocak & Ayhan, 2022; Rudnytsky, 1982).

The rich narratives of ancient Greek mythology provide fertile ground for cultivating critical thinking in students. Engaging with these stories allows students to practice essential skills such as analysis, interpretation, and ethical reasoning. As students delve into these myths, they are encouraged to go beyond the surface-level plot and explore the deeper meanings and implications of the stories. One way to engage students in critical thinking is by examining the motivations and actions of mythological characters. For instance, why does Achilles choose glory over a long life? What drives Medea to commit acts of revenge? (Fisheret al., 2020; Paulsen, 2023; Smith & Trzaskoma, 2022). By analyzing these characters’ decisions and the consequences that follow, students learn to consider the complexities of human behavior, the impact of societal expectations, and the moral dilemmas that arise in extreme circumstances. This kind of analysis helps students develop empathy and a nuanced understanding of human nature. Ancient Greek myths often present ethical and moral quandaries that are ripe for discussion and debate. The myth of Antigone, for example, confronts students with the conflict between obeying the law and following one’s moral convictions. Should Antigone have defied King Creon’s decree to honor her brother with a proper burial? (Contu, 2023; Dawson, 2020; de Fátima Silva, 2017; Morales, 2020; Özkaya, 2023; Sourvinou-Inwood, 1989; Yıldırım, 2022). Such stories invite students to reflect on the tension between duty to the state and personal ethics, encouraging them to consider multiple perspectives and the potential consequences of different actions. By engaging with these narratives, students are not only learning about the past but also developing the ability to think critically about moral and ethical issues in their own lives. They learn to weigh different values, assess the impact of actions on others, and construct reasoned arguments based on evidence and logical reasoning (Anhalt, 2017; Dowden & Livingstone, 2011; Friaset al., 2015; Rose, 1991; Sansomet al., 2022; Yao, 2021).

Ancient Greek religion is also closely intertwined with the development of Western philosophy. The religious beliefs and practices of the Greeks influenced the work of philosophers like Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, who often engaged with religious themes in their philosophical inquiries. For example, Plato’s Republic explores the concept of justice, a central concern in many Greek myths, through philosophical dialogue (Allen, 1965; Annas, 1982; Brisson, 1998; Burnyeat, 2009; Buxton, 1999; Collobertet al., 2012; Ferrari, 2007; Fowler, 2011; Howland, 2006; Lear, 2006; Most, 2012; Partenie, 2009; Rowe, 1999; Segal, 1978). Meanwhile, Aristotle’s ideas about virtue and the good life are deeply rooted in the moral and ethical questions that pervade Greek mythology. Studying this intersection between religion and philosophy encourages students to think critically about the nature of belief, morality, and the human condition. It also helps them understand how ancient Greek thought laid the foundation for many of the philosophical debates that continue to shape Western intellectual traditions.

Analyzing Myths: Encouraging Deep Interpretation and Philosophical Inquiry

One of the most effective ways to cultivate critical thinking through the study of ancient Greek religion is by engaging students in the analysis of myths. Ancient Greek myths are rich with characters who confront profound ethical and moral dilemmas, making them ideal tools for teaching ethical reasoning—a critical component of critical thinking. These narratives do more than entertain; they challenge readers to reflect on difficult choices, consider the implications of various actions, and explore the tensions between conflicting values. By analyzing these dilemmas, students can develop their moral reasoning skills, learning to navigate the complexities of decision-making in both personal and societal contexts.

Take, for instance, the myth of Prometheus, a Titan who defied Zeus, the king of the gods, to bring fire to humanity. This story is rich in symbolic meaning and serves as a powerful narrative for exploring themes of rebellion, knowledge, and the consequences of challenging authority. Prometheus’ act of defiance can be seen as a symbol of human curiosity and the pursuit of knowledge. By stealing fire, Prometheus is not just providing humanity with a physical tool but also with the metaphorical light of reason and civilization. Fire represents technology, progress, and the ability to transform the world, which are fundamental aspects of human development. However, Prometheus’ punishment by Zeus—being bound to a rock where an eagle eats his liver daily—raises critical questions about the cost of defiance and the limits of human aspiration. Should individuals challenge authority in the pursuit of knowledge, even at great personal risk? What responsibilities come with the power that knowledge bestows? These questions are central to the story and provoke deep reflection on the balance between ambition and caution, progress and ethics. Through the analysis of Prometheus’ story, students can engage in discussions about the nature of innovation, the ethical implications of scientific and technological advancements, and the potential consequences of challenging established norms or authorities. This process encourages students to think critically about the moral and ethical dimensions of human actions, both in the past and in contemporary society (Blanariu, 2017; Cameron, 1943; Conboy, 2019; Kazamias, 2009; Marshall & Ojiako, 2010; Peretti, 2009; Ray, 1973; Townsend, 1972).

Another quintessential myth for cultivating critical thinking is the tale of Oedipus, a king who unknowingly fulfills a prophecy that foretold he would kill his father and marry his mother. This myth is not only a tragic story but also a profound exploration of fate, free will, and the limitations of human understanding. The myth of Oedipus confronts students with the tension between fate and free will. Despite his efforts to avoid the prophecy, Oedipus ultimately fulfills it, raising questions about whether humans have control over their destinies or whether their lives are predetermined by forces beyond their control. This dilemma is at the heart of many philosophical and theological debates, making the myth an ideal starting point for discussions about determinism, autonomy, and the nature of human agency. Moreover, the story of Oedipus is rich in tragic irony, a literary device where the audience is aware of the truth that the characters are not. Oedipus’ relentless pursuit of the truth about his origins, driven by a desire to avoid the prophecy, ultimately leads him to uncover the very reality he sought to escape. This irony not only heightens the tragedy of the story but also invites students to reflect on the dangers of knowledge and the limits of human understanding. Analyzing the myth of Oedipus encourages students to grapple with difficult questions about the extent of human control over life’s outcomes and the potential consequences of our choices. It also prompts them to consider the role of knowledge in shaping our destiny and whether the pursuit of truth is always desirable or sometimes fraught with peril (Datan, 1988; Kai, 2023; Köse, 2022; Lacoue-Labarthe & Macey, 2003; Moddelmog, 1993; Ocak & Ayhan, 2022; Rudnytsky, 1982).

The myth of Sisyphus also offers a wide field of philosophical analysis, enhancing critical thinking. Sisyphus, the king of Corinth, was condemned by the gods to eternally roll a boulder up a hill, only for it to roll back down each time he neared the top. His punishment was a result of his cleverness in tricking the gods, especially by cheating death twice. This myth can be used to explore the concept of existentialism, particularly the idea of the absurd, as later elaborated by the philosopher Camus (1990). Students can discuss the nature of Sisyphus’ punishment, the futility of his task, and what this says about human life and the pursuit of meaning in a seemingly indifferent universe (Bowker, 2022; Francev, 2022; Gardner, 2021; Hobson, 2017; Lamb, 2012; Nathan, 2000).

The myth of Icarus is a well-known one: Icarus, the son of the master craftsman Daedalus, escapes from the island of Crete using wings made of feathers and wax. Despite his father’s warnings, Icarus flies too close to the sun, causing the wax to melt and leading to his fall into the sea, where he drowns. This myth addresses themes of hubris, the dangers of over-ambition, and the consequences of ignoring wisdom and moderation. It invites students to think critically about the balance between ambition and recklessness and the human tendency to overreach, often with disastrous results (Anderson, 1974; Farrell, 1992; Hammond, 2002; Pirrie, 2015; Restivo, 2022; Sadler-Smith, 2020; Yildirmaz, 2022).

One of the most instructive myths, and one of the most widespread, is the myth of Pandora, the first woman who was created by the gods and was given a jar (often mistranslated as a box) containing all the evils of the world. Out of curiosity, she opened it, releasing these evils into the world, leaving only Hope inside once she closed it again. This myth provides a rich ground for exploring the nature of curiosity, the origin of evil, and the duality of hope as both a blessing and a curse. Students can engage in discussions about the implications of knowledge and curiosity and whether hope is a force for good or a means of prolonging suffering (Alcoloumbre, 2022; Barrell, 1992; Bell, 2006; Butler, 2005; Geoghegan, 2008; Greenhalghet al., 2024; Haynes, 2020; Magrini, 2020).

Narcissus, a beautiful young man, fell in love with his own reflection in a pool of water, becoming so entranced that he eventually wasted away and died, turning into the flower that bears his name. This myth is a potent exploration of self-love, vanity, and the dangers of excessive self-focus. It invites discussions about the balance between healthy self-regard and narcissism and how this affects interpersonal relationships and one’s own identity (Basbaum, 2022; Bergmann, 1984; Durst, 2002; Hannan, 1992; Hermans & Van Gilst, 1991; Spaas, 1996; Vinge, 2020).

The Iliad is in itself a special field of analysis at all levels, from the psychoanalytic to the sociological, fueling fruitful debates on its role in strengthening critical thinking. Paris, a prince of Troy, is asked to judge which of the three goddesses—Hera, Athena, or Aphrodite—is the fairest. Each goddess offers him a bribe: Hera offers power, Athena offers wisdom and skill in battle, and Aphrodite offers the most beautiful woman in the world, Helen. Paris chooses Aphrodite, leading to the events that spark the Trojan War. This myth can be used to explore the themes of choice, consequence, and the subjective nature of value. Students can discuss how decisions based on personal desires rather than ethical considerations can lead to far-reaching consequences, as well as the concept of “moral blindness” and the costs of favoritism (Cassireret al., 2020; Cyrino, 2022; Davies, 2003; Foley, 2021; Frade, 2022; Maurice, 2022; Souris, 2011).

One of the most famous ethical dilemmas in Greek mythology is faced by Achilles in Homer’s Iliad. Achilles, the greatest warrior of the Greeks, is presented with a choice that embodies the conflict between a short, glorious life and a long, uneventful one. This decision is not just about personal fate; it reflects broader questions about the nature of honor, the pursuit of excellence, and the meaning of life itself. Achilles’ dilemma can be seen as a reflection of the Greek heroic ideal, which placed immense value on glory and fame—qualities that could outlive a person and grant them immortality in the memory of others. However, the cost of this glory is his own life, which Achilles must sacrifice to achieve it. This raises significant ethical questions: Is it worth sacrificing one’s life for the sake of eternal renown? Should personal safety and long-term well-being be sacrificed for the fleeting moments of greatness? What does this choice say about the value placed on life versus legacy? Students can engage with this dilemma by debating what they would do in Achilles’ place. This discussion can lead to a deeper exploration of concepts such as the value of life, the nature of heroism, and the pursuit of personal goals versus societal expectations. By weighing these factors, students learn to navigate the tension between competing values and to appreciate the complexity of ethical decision-making.

Theseus, a hero of Athens, volunteers to enter the labyrinth and slay the Minotaur, a creature that is half-man, half-bull, to end the tribute of youths sent by Athens to Crete. With the help of Ariadne’s thread, he navigates the labyrinth, kills the Minotaur, and escapes. This myth touches on themes of heroism, sacrifice, and the confrontation with one’s own inner “monsters” or fears. It also allows for a discussion of the ethics of power, the responsibilities of leadership, and the complexity of human nature, symbolized by the hybrid Minotaur (Egan, 2021; Felix, 2009; Fernández-Canoet al., 2012; Futter, 2023; Kinnaset al., 2023; Roskam, 2023; Toscano, 2018).

Another powerful example of an ethical dilemma in Greek mythology is found in Sophocles’ Antigone. The titular character, Antigone, faces a dire choice between obeying the laws of the state, as decreed by King Creon, and fulfilling her moral duty to bury her brother, Polynices, according to divine law. This conflict is a classic example of the struggle between civic duty and personal morality, a theme that remains deeply relevant in contemporary discussions of ethics and justice. Antigone’s dilemma forces students to consider the weight of legal authority versus moral responsibility. On one hand, Creon represents the rule of law, which is essential for maintaining order in society. On the other hand, Antigone represents the moral imperative to honor the dead and follow the unwritten laws of the gods, which she believes supersede human laws. This story invites students to reflect on questions such as: When is it justified to disobey the law? What are the consequences of placing personal morality above societal rules? How do we balance our duties to the state with our ethical obligations to family and religion? Through this analysis, students can explore the nuances of moral reasoning and consider how similar conflicts might arise in their own lives (Contu, 2023; Dawson, 2020; de Fátima Silva, 2017; Morales, 2020; Özkaya, 2023; Sourvinou-Inwood, 1989).

By analyzing myths like those above, students are not just learning about ancient stories; they are engaging in a deeper exploration of ideas that resonate across time and cultures. These myths serve as entry points into discussions about fundamental aspects of human existence, such as the tension between individual agency and societal constraints, the ethical implications of actions, and the search for meaning in a complex and often ambiguous world (Buxton, 2022; Zgoll, 2020).

The process of myth analysis also encourages critical reflection and dialogue among students. As they discuss the motivations of characters, the moral dilemmas they face, and the broader themes of the stories, students develop the ability to consider multiple perspectives, weigh evidence, and construct reasoned arguments. The process of analyzing these ethical dilemmas helps students develop crucial moral reasoning skills. By considering the choices faced by characters like Achilles and Antigone, students learn to weigh different values and principles against one another. They are encouraged to think about the potential consequences of various actions, not only for the individuals involved but also for the broader community. This analytical approach fosters an educational environment where students are encouraged to question assumptions, challenge interpretations, and engage in thoughtful debate (Ventoulis & Xinogalos, 2022).

When students are encouraged to analyze these myths, they learn to move beyond surface-level understanding. They are prompted to ask questions such as: What do these myths reveal about ancient Greek values? How do the actions of the gods and heroes reflect broader societal norms or philosophical ideas? What are the implications of these stories for understanding concepts such as fate, justice, or hubris? Through such inquiries, students engage in higher-order thinking, evaluating the narratives and forming their interpretations.

Moreover, such discussions often reveal the complexity of moral decision-making, underscoring the importance of considering multiple perspectives. For example, while Achilles’ decision might be seen as noble by some, others might view it as reckless or self-centered. Similarly, while Antigone’s defiance can be seen as an act of courage, it can also be interpreted as a dangerous challenge to the rule of law. Encouraging students to explore these different viewpoints helps them to understand that ethical dilemmas are rarely black and white and that real-world decisions often involve navigating shades of gray.

These mythological dilemmas also provide a bridge for students to apply ethical reasoning to contemporary issues. The questions of honor versus safety and law versus morality are not confined to ancient Greece. They echo modern debates about war, civil disobedience, whistleblowing, and individual rights versus collective responsibility. They draw parallels between the dilemmas faced by ancient Greek characters and those encountered in today’s world. Students can better understand the relevance of ethical reasoning in their own lives and in the broader societal context.

Comparative Analysis: Encouraging Broader Perspectives

Teaching ancient Greek religion through comparative analysis is a highly effective method for fostering critical thinking. By comparing Greek religious beliefs and practices with those of other ancient cultures, such as the Egyptians or Mesopotamians, or even with modern religious traditions, students are encouraged to engage in a deeper exploration of how and why different religious systems develop. This approach not only enhances their understanding of Greek religion but also helps them appreciate the broader context of religious diversity and its implications.

Analyzing Greek Religion in Context

Ancient Greek religion is characterized by its pantheon of anthropomorphic gods, each with distinct personalities, powers, and domains. The Greek gods are portrayed with human-like traits, including emotions, conflicts, and desires. This anthropomorphism reflects a worldview where divine and human realms are closely intertwined, influencing everything from morality to cosmology. To deepen their understanding, students can compare Greek religious beliefs with those of other ancient civilizations. For instance:

– Egyptian Religion: Unlike the Greek pantheon, Egyptian religion featured a complex array of gods, often depicted with animal heads or as abstract forms. The Egyptians had gods associated with natural forces and cosmic order, such as Ra, the sun god, and Osiris, the god of the afterlife. Exploring these differences helps students understand how different cultures personified divine forces and their implications for religious practices and societal values (Alm, 2012; Bell, 1953; Bleeker, 1975; Bonnefoy, 1992; Flinders Petrie, 2021; Frankfort, 1948; La’Da, 2016; Wiedemann, 2003).

– Mesopotamian Religion: Mesopotamian religion, with its pantheon of gods like Marduk and Ishtar, was deeply intertwined with the state and cosmological order. The concept of divine kingship and the role of deities in maintaining cosmic and social order contrasts with the more personal, character-driven interactions between Greek gods and humans. Comparing these systems can reveal insights into how religious beliefs shape political and social structures (Brandon, 2024; Graf, 2007; Lambert, 2016; Schneider, 2011; Marcovich, 1996; Noegel, 2007; Roberts, 2020; Rutherford, 2020; Saadati & Kheirandish, 2020).

Comparative Analysis with Modern Religions

Comparing ancient Greek religion with modern religious traditions can further enrich students’ understanding:

– Hinduism: The Greek pantheon’s anthropomorphic gods can be contrasted with the more abstract and diverse deities of Hinduism, such as Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva. Hindu deities are often depicted with multiple arms and heads, representing various aspects of the divine. This comparison can lead to discussions about different approaches to representing the divine and the theological implications of these representations (Klostermaier, 2014; Lancaster, 1953; Morgan, 1987; Papageorgiou & Ziaka, 2020; Pugazhendhi, 2021; Ranganathan, 2022).

– Christianity: The Greek emphasis on fate and the predetermined nature of many myths can be contrasted with the Christian concept of free will and divine providence. For example, in Christianity, individuals are often seen as having the ability to choose their path and seek redemption, whereas Greek mythology frequently portrays fate as an unavoidable force. This comparison invites students to explore how different religions conceptualize human agency, divine intervention, and moral responsibility (Barnes, 2024; Eidinowet al., 2016; Fairbanks, 1907; Ficino, 2022; Hopkins, 2023; Karamanolis, 2021; Makrides, 2009; Roberts, 2020).

Identifying Similarities and Differences

A key component of comparative analysis is identifying both similarities and differences between religious traditions. Students can investigate:

– Themes and Motifs: While the Greek gods are anthropomorphic and deeply involved in human affairs, many religions feature gods or spirits with roles in natural or cosmic order. Analyzing themes such as creation, destruction, and divine justice across different cultures can highlight universal concerns as well as unique cultural expressions (Eckert, 1963; Floky, 2018; Kearns, 2009; Larson, 2016; Zelinová & Škvrnda, 2023).

– Rituals and Practices: Students can compare religious rituals and practices, such as sacrifices, offerings, or ceremonies, to understand how different cultures address the divine and the sacred. For example, Greek rituals were often performed in public spaces and involved dramatic storytelling, while other traditions might emphasize private devotion or communal worship (Bremmer, 1983; Cole, 2004; Dodd & Faraone, 2013; Yioutsos, 2014).

Analyzing the Reasons behind Differences

Encouraging students to analyze the reasons behind similarities and differences in religious beliefs can deepen their critical thinking. Students can explore how geographic, historical, and social contexts shape religious beliefs. For instance, the Greek focus on human-like gods may reflect the social structures and values of city-states, whereas the abstract deities of Hinduism might arise from different philosophical and theological developments. Comparing how different religions address social and ethical issues can reveal how religious beliefs serve societal functions. For example, Greek myths often reinforce social norms and values through stories of divine retribution and reward, while other religions might focus on ethical teachings or communal harmony.

Broadening Perspectives and Understanding

By engaging in comparative analysis, students gain a broader perspective on how religious beliefs are shaped by cultural, historical, and social contexts. There is a rich diversity in how different cultures conceive of and interact with the divine. Recognizing this diversity fosters tolerance and appreciation for different religious traditions. Also, cultural contexts deeply influence religious beliefs and practices. Understanding this influence helps students appreciate how religions evolve and adapt to different environments and historical circumstances. Religious beliefs are complex and multifaceted. Comparative analysis reveals that there are many ways to understand and address fundamental questions about existence, morality, and the divine.

Conclusion

Teaching ancient Greek religion in today’s educational context offers significant pedagogical value, particularly in cultivating critical thinking skills. Through the analysis of myths, ethical dilemmas, philosophical inquiries, and comparative studies, students engage in deep, reflective thinking that challenges their assumptions and broadens their intellectual horizons. As educators seek to prepare students for the complexities of the modern world, ancient Greek religion provides a rich and relevant resource for developing the critical thinking skills that are essential for success in both academic and real-world contexts. By exploring the beliefs and practices of this ancient civilization, students not only gain a deeper understanding of the past but also sharpen their ability to think critically, reason ethically, and engage with diverse perspectives.

References

  1. Afzal, A., Kamran, F., & Naseem, A. (2023). The role of teachers in fostering critical thinking skills at the University level. Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(3), 202-214.
     Google Scholar
  2. Ainslie, S., Thompson, D., Maynard, S., & Ahmad, A. (2023). Cyber-threat intelligence for security decision-making: A review and research agenda for practice. Computers & Security, 132, 103352.
     Google Scholar
  3. Alcoloumbre, T. J. (2022). Eve and Pandora: Myths in Dialogue. Gender, Creation Myths and their Reception in Western Civilization: Prometheus, Pandora, Adam and Eve, 57.
     Google Scholar
  4. Allen, R. E. (ed.) (1965). Studies in Plato’s Metaphysics. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
     Google Scholar
  5. Alm, B. (2012). Ancient Egyptian Religion. New York Times.
     Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, S. M. (1974). Metaphoric Dimensions Of Myth In An Interdisciplinary Context. University of Michigan.
     Google Scholar
  7. Anhalt, E. K. (2017). Enraged: why violent times need ancient Greek myths. Yale University Press.
     Google Scholar
  8. Annas, J. (1982). Plato’s Myths of Judgement. Phronesis, 27: 119–43.
     Google Scholar
  9. Bailin, S. (1987). Critical and creative thinking. Informal Logic, 9(1), 23-30.
     Google Scholar
  10. Barnes, E. W. (2024). The rise of Christianity. BoD–Books on Demand.
     Google Scholar
  11. Barrell, J. (1992). The birth of Pandora and the division of knowledge (p. 41). London: Macmillan.
     Google Scholar
  12. Basadur, M., Gelade, G., & Basadur, T. (2014). Creative problem-solving process styles, cognitive work demands, and organizational adaptability. The journal of applied behavioral science, 50(1): 80-115.
     Google Scholar
  13. Basbaum, S. R. (2022). From Objective Reality to Fake News Galaxy: Narcissus Narcosis, Images and Imagination in Contemporary Global Expanded Reality Village. New Explorations: Studies in Culture and Communication, 2(3).
     Google Scholar
  14. Bell, H. I. (1953). Graeco-Egyptian Religion. Museum Helveticum, 10(3/4), 222-237.
     Google Scholar
  15. Bell, R. L. (2006). Perusing Pandora’s box. Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education, 427-446.
     Google Scholar
  16. Benjamin, K. A., & McLean, S. (2022). Change the medium, change the message: creativity is key to battle misinformation. Advances in Physiology Education, 46(2): 259-267.
     Google Scholar
  17. Bergmann, M. S. (1984). The legend of Narcissus. American Imago, 41(4), 389-411.
     Google Scholar
  18. Blanariu, N. P. (2017). Transmedial Prometheus: from the Greek Myth to Contemporary Interpretations. Revista ICONO 14. Revista científica de Comunicación y Tecnologías emergentes, 15(1), 88-107.
     Google Scholar
  19. Bleeker, C. J. (1975). Some Characteristic Features of the Ancient Egyptian Religion. In C. J. Bleeker (Ed.), The rainbow: A collection of studies in the science of religion (pp. 106-127). Brill.
     Google Scholar
  20. Bonnefoy, Y. (Ed.). (1992). Greek and Egyptian mythologies. University of Chicago Press.
     Google Scholar
  21. Bowker, M. (2022). Unlikely Heroism: Sisyphus, Camus, and the Absurd Posture. In Coming Back to the Absurd: Albert Camus’s The Myth of Sisyphus: 80 Years On (pp. 156-175). Brill.
     Google Scholar
  22. Bowra, C. M. (1952). Orpheus and Eurydice. The classical quarterly, 2(3-4), 113-126.
     Google Scholar
  23. Brandon, S. G. F. (2024). Religion in ancient history: Studies in ideas, men and events. Taylor & Francis.
     Google Scholar
  24. Brazdauskas, M. (2015). Promoting student innovation-driven thinking and creative problem solving for sustainability and corporate social responsibility. Innovation, 1.
     Google Scholar
  25. Bremmer, J. (1983). Scapegoat rituals in ancient Greece. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 87, 299-320.
     Google Scholar
  26. Brisson, L. (1998). Plato the Myth Maker [Platon, les mots et les mythes], translated, edited, and with an introduction by Gerard Naddaf, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     Google Scholar
  27. Browne, C. (2014). 10 Between Creative Democracy and Democratic Creativity. In Cornelius Castoriadis and Radical Democracy (pp. 196-217). Brill.
     Google Scholar
  28. Burnyeat, M. F. (2009). Eikōs mythos, in C. Partenie (ed.) Plato’s Myths. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 167-186.
     Google Scholar
  29. Butler, G. F. (2005). Milton’s Pandora: Eve, Sin, and the Mythographic Tradition. Milton Studies, 44, 153.
     Google Scholar
  30. Buxton, R. (Ed.). (1999). From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     Google Scholar
  31. Buxton, R. (2022). The Greek Myths that shape the way we think. London: Thames and Hudson.
     Google Scholar
  32. Cameron, K. N. (1943). The Political Symbolism of Prometheus Unbound. PMLA, 58(3): 728-753.
     Google Scholar
  33. Camus, A. (1990). The myth of Sisyphus. London: Penguin.
     Google Scholar
  34. Cassirer, E., Lofts, S. G., & Gordon, P. E. (2020). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, Volume 2: Mythical Thinking. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  35. Claxton, G., & Lucas, B. (2007). The creative thinking plan: how to generate ideas and solve problems in your work and life. Pearson Education.
     Google Scholar
  36. Cole, S. G. (2004). Landscapes, gender, and ritual space: the ancient Greek experience. Univ. of California Press.
     Google Scholar
  37. Collobert, C., Destrée, P., & Gonzales, F. J. (Eds.). (2012). Plato and Myth. Studies on the Use and Status of Platonic Myths (Mnemosyne Supplements, 337), Leiden-Boston: Brill.
     Google Scholar
  38. Conboy, K. (2019). Being promethean. European Journal of Information Systems, 28(2): 119-125.
     Google Scholar
  39. Contu, A. (2023). Antigone: On phronesis and how to make good and timely leadership decisions. Academy of Management Review, 48(1): 149-164.
     Google Scholar
  40. Cyrino, M. S. (2022). From judgment to fall: Aphrodite and Paris. Screening Love and War in Troy: Fall of a City, 37.
     Google Scholar
  41. Datan, N. (1988). The Oedipus cycle: developmental mythology, Greek tragedy, and the sociology of knowledge. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 27(1): 1-10.
     Google Scholar
  42. Davies, M. (2003). The judgements of Paris and Solomon. The Classical Quarterly, 53(1), 32-43.
     Google Scholar
  43. Dawson, T. (2020). Gender and the political in Antigone: The need to listen to others. In Exploring Depth Psychology and the Female Self (pp. 94-112). Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  44. de Fátima Silva, M. (2017). Antigone. In Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Sophocles (pp. 391-474). Brill.
     Google Scholar
  45. Dilekçi, A., & Karatay, H. (2023). The effects of the 21st century skills curriculum on the development of students’ creative thinking skills. Thinking skills and creativity, 47, 101229.
     Google Scholar
  46. Dixon, B. (2018). From making things public to the design of creative democracy: Dewey’s democratic vision and participatory design. CoDesign, 16(2), 97–110.
     Google Scholar
  47. Dodd, D., & Faraone, C. A. (Eds.). (2013). Initiation in ancient Greek rituals and narratives: new critical perspectives. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  48. Dougherty, C. (2006). Prometheus. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  49. Dowden, K., & Livingstone, N. (2011). Thinking through myth, thinking myth through. A companion to Greek mythology, 1-23.
     Google Scholar
  50. Durst, M. (2002). On the threshold of creativity: A hermeneutic interpretation of the myth of Narcissus. In The Creative Matrix of the Origins: Dynamisms, Forces and the Shaping of Life (pp. 271-296). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
     Google Scholar
  51. Eckert, C. W. (1963). Initiatory Motifs in the Story of Telemachus. The Classical Journal, 59(2), 49-57.
     Google Scholar
  52. Egan, K. D. (2021). Curricular change and the ship of Theseus. The Mentor: Innovative Scholarship on Academic Advising, 23, 24-39.
     Google Scholar
  53. Eidinow, E. (2011). Networks and narratives: a model for ancient Greek religion. Kernos. Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique, (24): 9-38.
     Google Scholar
  54. Eidinow, E., Kindt, J., & Osborne, R. (Eds.). (2016). Theologies of ancient Greek religion. Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  55. Ekström, M., & Östman, J. (2015). Information, interaction, and creative production: The effects of three forms of internet use on youth democratic engagement. Communication Research, 42(6): 796-818.
     Google Scholar
  56. Fairbanks, A. (1907). The Message of Greek Religion to Christianity Today. The Biblical World, 29(2), 111-120.
     Google Scholar
  57. Faraon, M. (2018). Concept-driven design for democracy: Advancing co-creative media to support citizen participation and democratic engagement. eJournal of eDemocracy & Open Government, 10(1): 23-49.
     Google Scholar
  58. Farrell, J. (1992). Icarus as anti-fascist myth: The case of Lauro de Bosis. Italica, 69(2), 198-209.
     Google Scholar
  59. Felix, J. S. (2009). Weaving Epic with Philosophy: DAEDALUS, THESEUS, AND SOCRATES. Confluence: The Journal of Graduate Liberal Studies, 14(2).
     Google Scholar
  60. Fernández-Cano, A., Torralbo, M., Vallejo, M., & Fernández-Guerrero, I. M. (2012). A narrative review of Greek myths as interpretative metaphors in educational research and evaluation. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 238-248.
     Google Scholar
  61. Ferrarello, L., Pereira Crespo Fiadeiro, R., Hall, A., Galdon, F., Anderson, P., Grinyer, C., Stevens, J., & Lee, C. H. (2021). Learning remotely through diversity and social awareness: The grand challenge approach to tackle societal issues through diversity and creative thinking. Learn X Design 2021: Engaging with challenges in design education, 879-899.
     Google Scholar
  62. Ferrari, G. R. F. (Ed.). (2007). The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  63. Ficino, M. (2022). On the Christian religion. University of Toronto Press.
     Google Scholar
  64. Fisher, R. L., LaFerriere, R., & Rixon, A. (2020). Flipped learning: An effective pedagogy with an Achilles’ heel. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(5): 543-554.
     Google Scholar
  65. Flinders Petrie, W. M. (2021). The religion of ancient Egypt. DTTV PUBLICATIONS.
     Google Scholar
  66. Floky, A. (2018). Chthonic motifs in ancient Greek and Roman mythical narratives. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Western Australia
     Google Scholar
  67. Foley, J. (2021). Storytelling, myths and legends. In A Practical Guide to Teaching English in the Secondary School (pp. 116-127). Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  68. Fowler, R. (2011). Mythos and logos. Journal of Hellenic Studies, 131: 45–66.
     Google Scholar
  69. Frade, S. (2022). Retelling the War of Troy: tragedy, emotions, and catharsis. Emotions and Narrative in Ancient Literature and Beyond, 324-336.
     Google Scholar
  70. Francev, P. (2022). The Myth of Sisyphus, the Absurd, and the Question of Empathy. In Coming Back to the Absurd: Albert Camus’s The Myth of Sisyphus: 80 Years On (pp. 31-52). Brill.
     Google Scholar
  71. Frankfort, H. (1948). Ancient Egyptian religion: an interpretation. Columbia University Press.
     Google Scholar
  72. Frias, F. J. L., Isidori, E., & Papaellina, C. H. (2015). Greek mythology and education: From theory to practice. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 595-599.
     Google Scholar
  73. Futter, D. (2023). Theseus in the labyrinth. In Acta Classica: Proceedings of the Classical Association of South Africa (Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 62-79). Classical Association of South Africa (CASA).
     Google Scholar
  74. Gafour, O. W., & Gafour, W. A. (2020). Creative thinking skills–A review article. Journal of Education and e-Learning, 4(1): 44-58.
     Google Scholar
  75. Gardner, S. T. (2021). Sisyphus and Climate Change: Educating in the Context of Tragedies of the Commons. Philosophies 2021, 6, 4.
     Google Scholar
  76. Geoghegan, V. (2008). Pandora’s box: Reflections on a myth. Critical Horizons, 9(1), 24-41.
     Google Scholar
  77. Gibson, R. (2015). The four lenses of innovation: a power tool for creative thinking. John Wiley & Sons.
     Google Scholar
  78. Graf, F. (2007). What is ancient Mediterranean religion?. Ancient Religions, 3-16.
     Google Scholar
  79. Greenhalgh, A. M., Allen, D. E., & Nesteruk, J. (2024). Addressing Next Stage Capitalism Through the Myth of Pandora: From Individual and Genuine to Collective Hope. In Justifying Next Stage Capitalism: Exploring a Hopeful Future (pp. 205-223). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
     Google Scholar
  80. Hammond, A. S. (2002). Reflections on the Myth of Icarus in the Age of Information. Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. LJ, 19, 407.
     Google Scholar
  81. Hannan, M. (1992). A psychoanalytic interpretation of Ovid’s myth of Narcissus and Echo. Psychoanalytic Review, 79(4), 555.
     Google Scholar
  82. Hardman, P. (1990). Narrative Typology: Chaucer’s Use of the Story of Orpheus. The Modern Language Review, 85(3): 545-554.
     Google Scholar
  83. Haynes, N. (2020). Pandora’s Jar: Women in the Greek Myths. Pan Macmillan.
     Google Scholar
  84. Hermans, H. J., & Van Gilst, W. (1991). Self-narrative and collective myth: An analysis of the Narcissus story. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 23(4), 423.
     Google Scholar
  85. Hobson, A. (2017). The Myth of Sisyphus. In Albert Camus and Education (pp. 1-21). Brill.
     Google Scholar
  86. Hopkins, R. R. (2023). How Greek Philosophy Corrupted the Christian Concept of God. Cedar Fort Publishing & Media.
     Google Scholar
  87. Howland, J. (2006). The Mythology of Philosophy: Plato’s Republic and the Odyssey of the Soul. Interpretation. A Journal of Political Philosophy, 33 (3): 219–242.
     Google Scholar
  88. Jofili, Z. M. S. (1996). Fostering Teachers’ Critical Thinking: Some paths to teacher development programmes. University of Surrey (United Kingdom).
     Google Scholar
  89. Joshi, S. C., Gupta, K., & Manektala, S. (2022). Misinformation, public opinion, and the role of critical thinking. International Journal of Management and Humanities, 8(9), 15-18.
     Google Scholar
  90. Kai, C. (2023). From Odyssey to Oedipus the King—Reflections on the Balance and Disequi Librium between Divine Order and Human Will. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 6(10), 87-92.
     Google Scholar
  91. Karamanolis, G. (2021). The philosophy of early Christianity. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  92. Kazamias, A. M. (2009). Agamemnon contra Prometheus: Globalisation, knowledge/learning societies and paideia in the new cosmopolis. In International handbook of comparative education (pp. 1079-1111). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
     Google Scholar
  93. Kearns, E. (Ed.). (2009). Ancient Greek religion: a sourcebook (Vol. 13). John Wiley & Sons.
     Google Scholar
  94. Kindt, J. (2012). Rethinking Greek Religion. Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  95. Kinnas, P., Panayiotopoulos, T., & Kotsifakos, D. (2023, March). Teaching the Myth of Theseus Through a Video Game, to Primary School Students. In International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (pp. 375-386). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
     Google Scholar
  96. Klostermaier, K. K. (2014). Hinduism: A short history. Simon and Schuster.
     Google Scholar
  97. Köse, N. N. (2022). Examination of King Oedipus, a fictional character, through ethical and political values. Master Thesis, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi.
     Google Scholar
  98. Lacoue-Labarthe, P., & Macey, D. (2003). Oedipus as figure. Radical Philosophy, (118): 7-17.
     Google Scholar
  99. La’Da, C. A. (2016). Encounters with ancient Egypt: the Hellenistic Greek experience. In Ancient Perspectives on Egypt (pp. 157-170). Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  100. Lamb, M. (2012). Re-examining Sartre’s Reading of The Myth of Sisyphus. Philosophy Today, 56(1), 100.
     Google Scholar
  101. Lambert, W. G. (2016). Ancient Mesopotamian religion and mythology: selected essays (Vol. 15). Mohr Siebeck.
     Google Scholar
  102. Lancaster, C. (1953). Greek and Hindu gods. College Art Journal, 12(4), 335-342.
     Google Scholar
  103. Larson, J. (2016). Understanding Greek Religion. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  104. Lear, J. (2006). Allegory and Myth in Plato’s Republic, in G. Santas (ed.) The Blackwell Guide to Plato’s Republic. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 25–43.
     Google Scholar
  105. Lee, A. Y. (2022). Media and information literacy: Evaluating misinformation and fake news in a complex world. In Soft Skills and Hard Values (pp. 164-179). Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  106. Lee, M. O. (1960). The myth of Orpheus and Eurydice in Western literature (Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia).
     Google Scholar
  107. Lin, C. S., & Wu, R. Y. W. (2016). Effects of web-based creative thinking teaching on students’ creativity and learning outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(6): 1675-1684.
     Google Scholar
  108. Magioglou, T. (2008). The creative dimension of lay thinking in the case of the representation of democracy for Greek youth. Culture & Psychology, 14(4): 442-466.
     Google Scholar
  109. Magrini, J. (2020). Nietzsche’s reading of the Pandora myth: Pessimism, hope, and the tragic art of the Greeks. Journal of Philosophical Investigations, 14(32), 117-133.
     Google Scholar
  110. Makrides, V. (2009). Hellenic temples and Christian churches: A concise history of the religious cultures of Greece from antiquity to the present. NYU Press.
     Google Scholar
  111. Marcovich, M. (1996). From Ishtar to Aphrodite. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 30(2), 43–59.
     Google Scholar
  112. Marshall, A., & Ojiako, U. (2010). From the myth of Prometheus to strategic resilience: Two cognitive paradigms linking risk and innovation. Prometheus, 28(4), 343-360.
     Google Scholar
  113. Mastul, A. R. H. (2024). The Crucial Role of Teachers in Fostering Creativity, Critical Thinking, and Motivation in Students. Jurnal Praktik Baik Pembelajaran Sekolah dan Pesantren, 3(02): 54-59.
     Google Scholar
  114. Maurice, L. (2022). Delineating the Divine: Gods and Religion at Troy. Screening Love and War in Troy: Fall of a City, 25-36.
     Google Scholar
  115. Meintjes, L. (2022). Faltering Toward Agency: A Search for Eurydice’s Voice. Margaret Atwood Studies, 15, 35-40.
     Google Scholar
  116. Moddelmog, D. (1993). Readers and Mythic Signs: The Oedipus Myth in Twentieth-Century Fiction. SIU Press.
     Google Scholar
  117. Morales, H. (2020). Antigone Rising: The Subversive Power of the Ancient Myths. Hachette UK.
     Google Scholar
  118. Morgan, K. W. (Ed.). (1987). The religion of the Hindus. Motilal Banarsidass Publ.
     Google Scholar
  119. Most, G. W. (2012). Plato’s Exoteric Myths, in C. Collobert, P. Destrée and F. J. Gonzales (eds.), Plato and Myth. Studies on the Use and Status of Platonic Myths (Mnemosyne Supplements, 337), Leiden-Boston: Brill, 13-24.
     Google Scholar
  120. Murdoch, B. O. (2024). Denial and Acceptance: A Core Myth of Orpheus and Eurydice in the Modern Lyric. Mythlore: A Journal of JRR Tolkien, CS Lewis, Charles Williams, and Mythopoeic Literature, 42(2), 4.
     Google Scholar
  121. Nathan, M. (2000). Crisis Learning--Lessons from Sisyphus and Others. Review of Business, 21(3), 3-3.
     Google Scholar
  122. Noegel, S. B. (2007). Greek religion and the ancient Near East. A Companion to Greek religion, 19-38.
     Google Scholar
  123. Nykyporets, S. S., Melnyk, O. D., Ibrahimova, L. V., Boiko, Y. V., & Kukharchuk, H. V. (2023). Fostering critical thinking in technical university students in foreign language classes: Strategies and approaches for cultivating analytical proficiency. Bulletin of Science and Education, № 8: 344-360.
     Google Scholar
  124. Ocak, E. H., & Ayhan, E. (2022). Deconstruction of Oedipus the King in myth due to the naming of the Oedipus complex. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, 30: 1170-1083.
     Google Scholar
  125. Özkaya, S. (2023). The Antigone myth on the basis of liminality and Subjectivity (Master’s thesis).
     Google Scholar
  126. Papageorgiou, N., & Ziaka, A. (2020). Hinduism in Greece: Historical Reconsiderations, Academic Appreciations, and Modern Migration. In Handbook of Hinduism in Europe (2 vols) (pp. 1041-1059). Brill.
     Google Scholar
  127. Partenie, C. (Ed.). (2009). Plato’s myths. Cambridge University Press.
     Google Scholar
  128. Paulsen, M. (2023). From Hero to Zero?: The Re-Negotiated Male Hero in Feminist Retellings of the Myths of Achilles and Herakles (Master’s thesis).
     Google Scholar
  129. Peretti, D. (2009). The modern Prometheus: The persistence of an ancient myth in the modern world, 1950 to 2007. Indiana University.
     Google Scholar
  130. Pirrie, A. (2015). Icarus falling: Re-imagining educational theory. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 49(4), 525-538.
     Google Scholar
  131. Pithers, R. T., & Soden, R. (2000). Critical thinking in education: A review. Educational research, 42(3), 237-249.
     Google Scholar
  132. Pugazhendhi, D. (2021). Greek, Tamil and Sanskrit: Comparison between the myths of Herakles (related with Iole and Deianira) and Rama in Hinduism. Athens Journal of Philology, 8(1), 9-36.
     Google Scholar
  133. Ranganathan, S. (2022). Hinduism, Belief and the Colonial Invention of Religion: A before and after Comparison. Religions, 13(10), 891.
     Google Scholar
  134. Rask, K. A. (2023). Personal Experience and Materiality in Greek Religion. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  135. Ray, W. E. (1973). The Education of Prometheus. Interpretations, 33-43.
     Google Scholar
  136. Restivo, S. (2022). Sustainable Journeys: Daedalus, Icarus, Tantalus and the Future of Science and the World. In Inventions in Sociology: Studies in Science and Society (pp. 301-324). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
     Google Scholar
  137. Rider, J. (1988). Receiving Orpheus in the Middle Ages: Allegorization, Remythification and Sir Orfeo. Papers on Language & Literature, 24: 343-366.
     Google Scholar
  138. Roberts, E. M. (2020). Underworld gods in ancient Greek religion: death and reciprocity. Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  139. Rose, P. W. (1991). Teaching Greek myth and confronting contemporary myths. The Bucknell Review, 35(1), 17.
     Google Scholar
  140. Rosenberg, S. W. (2007). Rethinking democratic deliberation: The limits and potential of citizen participation. Polity, 39(3): 335-360.
     Google Scholar
  141. Roskam, G. (2023). Plutarch’s Demiurgic Moralism in his Theseus–Romulus. In Acta Classica: Proceedings of the Classical Association of South Africa (Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 139-162). Classical Association of South Africa (CASA).
     Google Scholar
  142. Rowe, C. (1999). Myth, History, and Dialectic in Plato’s Republic and Timaeus-Critias, in R. Buxton (ed.) From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 251-262.
     Google Scholar
  143. Rudnytsky, P. L. (1982). Oedipus and Anti-Oedipus. World Literature Today, 56(3), 462-470.
     Google Scholar
  144. Rutherford, I. (2020). Hittite texts and Greek religion: contact, interaction, and comparison. Oxford University Press.
     Google Scholar
  145. Saadati, S., & Kheirandish, G. (2020). Immortality in the Great Religions and Myths of Iran, Mesopotamia, Sumer, and Greece. The Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 8(1), 77-92.
     Google Scholar
  146. Sacramento, C. A., Fay, D., & West, M. A. (2013). Workplace duties or opportunities? Challenge stressors, regulatory focus, and creativity. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 121(2): 141-157.
     Google Scholar
  147. Sadler-Smith, E. (2020). “Don’t fly too close to the sun”: Using Myth to Understand the Hazards of Hubristic Leadership. In Leadership and wisdom (pp. 44-61). Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  148. Sansom, S. A., Clary, T., & Aslan, C. (2022). Active Learning Techniques to Enhance Conceptual Learning in Greek Mythology. Classical World, 116(1), 75-105.
     Google Scholar
  149. Schieman, S., & Young, M. (2010). The demands of creative work: Implications for stress in the work–family interface. Social Science Research, 39(2): 246-259.
     Google Scholar
  150. Schneider, T. J. (2011). An introduction to ancient Mesopotamian religion. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing.
     Google Scholar
  151. Segal, C. (1978). The Myth Was Saved’: Reflections on Homer and the Mythology of Plato’s Republic. Hermes, 106 (2): 315–336.
     Google Scholar
  152. Smith, R. S., & Trzaskoma, S. M. (2022). Mythography and Education. The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Mythography, 409.
     Google Scholar
  153. Souris, I. (2011). The Myth of Helen of Troy: Reinterpreting the Archetypes of the Myth in Solo and Collaborative Forms of Playwriting. University of Exeter (United Kingdom).
     Google Scholar
  154. Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (1989). Assumptions and the creation of meaning: reading Sophocles’ Antigone. The Journal of Hellenic Studies, 109, 134-148.
     Google Scholar
  155. Spaas, L. (1996). Narcissus and Friday: from classical to anthropological myth. In Robinson Crusoe: Myths and Metamorphoses (pp. 98-109). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
     Google Scholar
  156. Strom, R. D., & Strom, P. S. (2002). Changing the rules: Education for creative thinking. The Journal of creative behavior, 36(3): 183-200.
     Google Scholar
  157. Stroumsa, G. G. (1987). Myth into Metaphor: The Case of Prometheus. In Gilgul (pp. 309-323). Brill.
     Google Scholar
  158. Sundt, P. A. (2021). Looking backwards and forwards: Orpheus in love and metapoetical complexities. Doctoral thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).
     Google Scholar
  159. Tobón, S., & Luna-Nemecio, J. (2021). Complex thinking and sustainable social development: Validity and reliability of the complex-21 scale. Sustainability, 13(12), 6591.
     Google Scholar
  160. Toscano, M. (2018). 7 The Immortality of Theseus and His Myth. In Epic Heroes on Screen (pp. 111-124). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474424523-012
     Google Scholar
  161. Townsend, D. W. (1972). Myth and meaning. Centennial Review, 192-202.
     Google Scholar
  162. Tripathy, M. (2018). Role of creative thinking as an imperative tool in communication at workplace. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communications and Conflict, 22(2): 1-7.
     Google Scholar
  163. Trousson, R. (2015). Prometheus. In Companion to Literary Myths, Heroes and Archetypes (pp. 968-981). Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  164. Ventoulis, E., & Xinogalos, S. (2022). AR The Gods of Olympus: Design and pilot evaluation of an augmented reality educational game for Greek mythology. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 7(1), 2.
     Google Scholar
  165. Vinge, L. (2020). Narcissus Revisited. Metamorphic Readings: Transformation, Language, and Gender in the Interpretation of Ovid’s Metamorphoses, 199.
     Google Scholar
  166. Wiedemann, A. (2003). Religion of the ancient Egyptians. Courier Corporation.
     Google Scholar
  167. Yao, J. (2021, August). Teaching Strategies in the “Greek Myths” Chapter based on the Hierarchical Model of Critical Thinking Ability. In 2021 5th International Seminar on Education, Management and Social Sciences (ISEMSS 2021) (pp. 1067-1071). Atlantis Press.
     Google Scholar
  168. Yıldırım, E. (2022). A comparative approach to the Oannes narrative in Mesopotamia and the Prometheus Myth in the Ancient Greek world. Belleten, 86(305), 39-60.
     Google Scholar
  169. Yildirmaz, K. (2022). Tears of Icarus. Questions: Philosophy for Young People, 22, 23-23.
     Google Scholar
  170. Yılmaz, A. (2021). The effect of technology integration in education on prospective teachers’ critical and creative thinking, multidimensional 21st century skills and academic achievements. Participatory Educational Research, 8(2), 163-199.
     Google Scholar
  171. Yioutsos, N. P. (2014). Pan rituals of ancient Greece: A multi-sensory body experience. In Archaeoacoustics: The Archaeology of Sound: Publication of Proceedings from the 2014 Conference in Malta (pp. 57-67). The OTS Foundation.
     Google Scholar
  172. Zelinová, Z., & Škvrnda, F. (2023). Anthropomorphic motifs in ancient Greek ideas on the origin of the cosmos. Human Affairs, 33(2), 172-183.
     Google Scholar
  173. Zgoll, C. (2020). Myths as Polymorphous and Polystratic Erzählstoffe. Mythische Sphärenwechsel: Methodisch Neue Zugänge zu antiken Mythen in Orient und Okzident, 9-82.
     Google Scholar