Students Considering Dropping Out: Comparing New and Experienced Students



Abstract Views
205

Downloads
162

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Dec 2, 2021
Published Jun 15, 2022
10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.3.237

Abstract viewed = 205 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Student dropout is a global phenomenon. For many reasons (individual, social, political, economic), it is considered a serious problem. The specialized bibliography usually deals either with all students or it focuses specifically on new students. However, there is not much comparative research on how to structure the thought of dropping out of university between new and experienced students. This is the aim of this text. Based on 1,029 students’ questionnaires, the quantitative study has shown that the way this thought is constructed is differentiated between new and experienced students. In other words, it is made up of a combination of different factors. For new students, the effect of the social representation ‘university’ and the motivation on the basis of this representation play a central role. On the contrary, when it comes to experienced students, the difficulties of university studies and especially the formulated perception of global student life seem to play the key role.

Keywords: Dropout, new students, experienced students, motivation, social representation

References

  1. Abric, J. Cl. (2001). L'artisan et l'artisanat: Analyse du contenu et de la structure d'une représentation sociale. Bulletin de Psychologie, 366, 861–876.
     Google Scholar
  2. Alban, M., & D. Mauricio. (2019). Predicting university dropout through data mining: a systematic literature. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 12(4), 1–12. doi:10.17485/ijst/2019/v12i4/139729.
     Google Scholar
  3. Altbach, Ph. G. 2004. Globalisation and the university: Myths and realities in a unequal world. Tertiary Education and Management, 10 (1)1, 3–25.
     Google Scholar
  4. Aschieri, G. M. (2012). Réussir la démocratisation de l'enseignement supérieur. L'enjeu du premier cycle. Paris: Les éditions des journaux officiels.
     Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (2003). Auto-efficacité. Le sentiment d’efficacité personnelle. Bruxelles: De Boeck (3d ed.).
     Google Scholar
  6. Barbeau, D. (1995). Analyse de déterminants et d’indicateurs de la motivation scolaire d’élèves du collégial. Αctes du 15e Colloque annuel de l’Association québécoise de pédagogie collégiale. Québéc: Rivière-du-Loup.
     Google Scholar
  7. Beaupère, N., L. Chalumeau, N. Gury, and H. Cédric. (2007). L'abandon des études supérieures. Paris: La Documentation Française.
     Google Scholar
  8. Bills, D. F. (2003). Characteristics Associated with Research Degree Student Satisfaction, Completion and Attrition at the University of South Australia. Adelaide: University of South Australia.
     Google Scholar
  9. Boudrenghien, G., M. Frenay, and E. Bourgeois. (2009). La transition de l’enseignement secondaire vers l’enseignement supérieur. Antécédents de l’engagement envers son but de formation. HAL-Archives-Ouvertes, https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00561578/document.
     Google Scholar
  10. Cross, Th., and R. Br. Slater. (2002). How bans on race-sensitive admissions severely cut black enrollments at flagship state universities. Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, 38, 93–99.
     Google Scholar
  11. Deci, E., and R. Ryan. (2000). The « what » and « why » of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
     Google Scholar
  12. Díaz, P., and A. T. De León. (2016). Design and Validation of a Questionnaire to Analyze University Dropout—CADES. World 3(2), 267–280. doi:10.22158/wjer.v3n2p267.
     Google Scholar
  13. Eccles, J., A. Wigfriend, and U. Schieffele. (1998). Motivation to Succeed. In Damon, W., Eisenberg N. (dir.), Handbook of child psychology 3, 5e édition:1017-1095. New York: John Wiley.
     Google Scholar
  14. Eurydice. (2014). Modernisation of Higher Education in Europe: Access, Retention and Employability. Brussels: European Commission.
     Google Scholar
  15. Gurtner, J. L., A. Gulfi, I. Monnard, and J. Schumachier. (2006). La motivation. In Gurtner, J.-L., Gulfi, A., Monnard, I., & Schumachier, J. La motivation scolaire: approches récentes et perspectives pratiques. Revue français de pédagogie, 155, 21–33.
     Google Scholar
  16. Hellenic Quality Assurance. (2018). Rapport sur la qualité de l'enseignement supérieur. Athènes: HQA, 2018.
     Google Scholar
  17. Jodelet, D. (1985). Civils et bredins rapport à la folie et représentation sociale de la maladie mentale. Paris: EHESS.
     Google Scholar
  18. Jodelet, D. (1991). L'éidéologie dans l'étude des représentations sociales. In Aesbischer, V., Deconchy J.P. & Lipianski, E.M. Idéologies et représentations sociales. Fribourg: Les éditions DelVal.
     Google Scholar
  19. Kehm, B. M., M. R. Larsen, and H. B. Sommersel. (2019). Student dropout from universities in Europe: A review of empirical literature. Hungarian Educational Research Journal, 9(2), 147–164. doi:10.1556/063.9.2019.1.18.
     Google Scholar
  20. Kim, D., and S. Kim. (2018). Sustainable education: analyzing the determinants of university student dropout by nonlinear panel data models. Sustainability, 10(4), 954. doi:10.3390/su10040954.
     Google Scholar
  21. Kiprianos, P., and M. Koniordos. (2003). La demystification du diplôme. les retardateurs et ceux qui abandonnent. Synchroni Ekpaideysi, 132, 23–34.
     Google Scholar
  22. Kori, K., M. Pedaste, E. Tõnisson, T. Palts, H. Altin, R. Rantsus, R. Sell, K. Murtazin, and T. Rüütmann. (2015). First-year dropout in ICT studies. 2015 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON): 437–445. doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2015.7096008.
     Google Scholar
  23. Lacroix, M. E., and P. Potvin. (2009). Les pratiques innivantes en éducation. RIRE CTREQ. Disponible sur internet: http://rire.ctreq.qc.ca/;es-pratiques-innovantes-en-education-version-integrale, 2009 (consulted 10 Octobre 2020).
     Google Scholar
  24. Moscovici, S. (2004) [1961]. La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: PUF.
     Google Scholar
  25. Moscovici, S. (2014) [1984]. La psychologie sociale. Paris: PUF.
     Google Scholar
  26. OVE. (2007). 20 questions sur la vie étudiante. Paris: la documentation française.
     Google Scholar
  27. Paivandi, S. (2019). Le défi de la transition entre secondaire et supérieur. Construisons des ponts. Paris: Conseil National d'Évaluation du Système Scolaire.
     Google Scholar
  28. Parmentier, P. and M. Romainville. (1998). L’étudiant-apprenant. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
     Google Scholar
  29. Pascarella, E. and P. Terenzini. (2005). How college affects students. Vol.B A decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
     Google Scholar
  30. Perret, C. and J. Berthaud. (2013). Le choix des étudiants et l'efficacité des actions de soutien: Évaluation de dispositifs du programme de réussite en Licence. Dijon: Les Documents de Travail de l'IREDU.
     Google Scholar
  31. Pike, G. R., and J. L Saupe. (2002). Does high school matter? An analysis of three methods of predicting first-year grades. Research in Higher Education, 43(2), 187–207. doi:10.1023/A:1014419724092.
     Google Scholar
  32. Purrer-Ouakil, D., G. Michel, and F. Perz-Diaz. (2004). Influence des traits de tempérament et du contexte sur le choix des stratégies de coping dans une population d’étudiant. Annales médico-psychologique, 16(3), 203-208.
     Google Scholar
  33. Ringard, J., and A. Fléges. (2016). L'affectation en première année de licence dans les formations à capacité d'accueil limitée. États des lieux et propositions. Paris: IGAENR. Rapport no.2016-004.
     Google Scholar
  34. Roland, N., and P. Emplit. (2015). Enseignement transmissif, apprentissage actif: usages du podcasting par les étudiants universitaire. Revue internationale de pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur,. 31(1). https://journals.openedition.org/ripes/932.
     Google Scholar
  35. Rοmainville, M. (2000). L'échec dans l'université de masse. Paris: L'Hamarttan.
     Google Scholar
  36. Roso-Bas, F., A. P. Jiménez, and E. García-Buades. (2016). Emotional variables, dropout and academic performance in Spanish nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 37, 53–58. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2015.11.021.
     Google Scholar
  37. Sianou-Kyrgiou, E. (2002). Inégalités éducatives et sociales. La transition du secondaire au supérieur (1997-2004). Athènes: Metaichmio.
     Google Scholar
  38. Stamelos, G. (2002). Le système de l'éducation: l'éducation primaire et secondaire. Données quantitatives. Athènes: KEE, 2002, 421 pages (text en grec).
     Google Scholar
  39. Stamelos, G. (2016). Les étudiants retardateurs. Report 16. Patras: HepNet.
     Google Scholar
  40. Stamelos, G. and P. Evangelakou. (2018). Learning outcomes and qualifications in a changing labour market: the case of teacher education in Greece (Patras). Form@re, 18(3), 250–264.
     Google Scholar
  41. Tardif, J. (1992). Pour un enseignament stratégique. L'apport de la psychologie cognifive. Montréal: Les Éditions Logiques.
     Google Scholar
  42. Tavris, C. and C. Wade. (1999). Introduction à la psychologie : les grandes perspectives. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
     Google Scholar
  43. Tinto, V. (1993) [1987]. Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student attrition. Chcago: University of Chicago Press.
     Google Scholar
  44. Tinto, V. (1997). Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistance. Journal of Higher Education, 68 (6), 599–623.
     Google Scholar
  45. Tinto, V. (2006). Research and practice of student retention: What next? Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 8(1), 1–19. doi.org/10.2190%2F4YNU-4TMB-22DJ-AN4W.
     Google Scholar
  46. Tinto, V. (2017). Through the eyes of students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(3), 254–269. doi:10.1177/1521025115621917.
     Google Scholar
  47. Van Bragt, C. A. C., A. W. E. A Bakx, T. C. M Bergen, and M. A. Croon. (2011). Looking for students’ personal characteristics predicting study outcome. Higher Education, 61(1), 59–75. doi:10.1007/s10734-010-9325-7.
     Google Scholar
  48. Van Bragt, C. A. C., A. W. E. A. Bakx, J. M. M. Van der Sanden, and M. A. Croon. (2007). Students’ approaches to learning when entering higher education: Differences between students with senior general secondary and senior secondary educational backgrounds. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(1), 83–96. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.02.003.
     Google Scholar
  49. Van der Hulst, M., and E. Jansen. (2002). Effects of curriculum organisation on study progress in engineering studies. Higher Education, 43(4), 489–506. doi:10.1023/A:1015207706917.
     Google Scholar
  50. Viau, R. (2009) [1994]. La motivation en contexte scolaire. Bruxelles: De Boeck.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)